Revisiting the Linear-Programming Framework for Offline RL with General Function Approximation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.13861v1
• Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 15:28:12 GMT
• Title: Revisiting the Linear-Programming Framework for Offline RL with General Function Approximation
• Authors: Asuman Ozdaglar, Sarath Pattathil, Jiawei Zhang, Kaiqing Zhang
• Abstract summary: offline reinforcement learning (RL) concerns pursuing an optimal policy for sequential decision-making from a pre-collected dataset. Recent theoretical progress has focused on developing sample-efficient offline RL algorithms with various relaxed assumptions on data coverage and function approximators. We revisit the linear-programming framework for offline RL, and advance the existing results in several aspects.
• Score: 24.577243536475233
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning (RL) concerns pursuing an optimal policy for sequential decision-making from a pre-collected dataset, without further interaction with the environment. Recent theoretical progress has focused on developing sample-efficient offline RL algorithms with various relaxed assumptions on data coverage and function approximators, especially to handle the case with excessively large state-action spaces. Among them, the framework based on the linear-programming (LP) reformulation of Markov decision processes has shown promise: it enables sample-efficient offline RL with function approximation, under only partial data coverage and realizability assumptions on the function classes, with favorable computational tractability. In this work, we revisit the LP framework for offline RL, and advance the existing results in several aspects, relaxing certain assumptions and achieving optimal statistical rates in terms of sample size. Our key enabler is to introduce proper constraints in the reformulation, instead of using any regularization as in the literature, sometimes also with careful choices of the function classes and initial state distributions. We hope our insights further advocate the study of the LP framework, as well as the induced primal-dual minimax optimization, in offline RL.

Related papers

• Span-Agnostic Optimal Sample Complexity and Oracle Inequalities for Average-Reward RL [6.996002801232415]
  We study the sample complexity of finding an $varepsilon$-optimal policy in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with a generative model. We develop the first algorithms matching the optimal span-based complexity without $H$ knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T19:10:55Z)
• Nearly Optimal Sample Complexity of Offline KL-Regularized Contextual Bandits under Single-Policy Concentrability [49.96531901205305]
  We propose the emphfirst algorithm with $tildeO(epsilon-1)$ sample complexity under single-policy concentrability for offline contextual bandits. Our proof leverages the strong convexity of the KL regularization, and the conditional non-negativity of the gap between the true reward and its pessimistic estimator. We extend our algorithm to contextual dueling bandits and achieve a similar nearly optimal sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T22:14:45Z)
• A Primal-Dual Algorithm for Offline Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Linear MDPs [18.449996575976993]
  We propose a primal dual algorithm for offline RL with linear MDPs in the infinite-horizon discounted setting. Our algorithm is the first computationally efficient algorithm in this setting that achieves sample complexity of $O(epsilon-2)$ with partial data coverage assumption. We extend our algorithm to work in the offline constrained RL setting that enforces constraints on additional reward signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T00:33:11Z)
• On Sample-Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning: Data Diversity, Posterior Sampling, and Beyond [29.449446595110643]
  We propose a notion of data diversity that subsumes the previous notions of coverage measures in offline RL. Our proposed model-free PS-based algorithm for offline RL is novel, with sub-optimality bounds that are frequentist (i.e., worst-case) in nature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-06T20:52:04Z)
• Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint [56.74058752955209]
  This paper studies the alignment process of generative models with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) We first identify the primary challenges of existing popular methods like offline PPO and offline DPO as lacking in strategical exploration of the environment. We propose efficient algorithms with finite-sample theoretical guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T18:58:42Z)
• Bridging Distributionally Robust Learning and Offline RL: An Approach to Mitigate Distribution Shift and Partial Data Coverage [32.578787778183546]
  offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms learn optimal polices using historical (offline) data. One of the main challenges in offline RL is the distribution shift. We propose two offline RL algorithms using the distributionally robust learning (DRL) framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T19:19:30Z)
• Pessimistic Nonlinear Least-Squares Value Iteration for Offline Reinforcement Learning [53.97335841137496]
  We propose an oracle-efficient algorithm, dubbed Pessimistic Least-Square Value Iteration (PNLSVI) for offline RL with non-linear function approximation. Our algorithm enjoys a regret bound that has a tight dependency on the function class complexity and achieves minimax optimal instance-dependent regret when specialized to linear function approximation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T17:42:01Z)
• Offline Primal-Dual Reinforcement Learning for Linear MDPs [16.782625445546273]
  Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) aims to learn a near-optimal policy from a fixed dataset of transitions collected by another policy. This paper proposes a primal-dual optimization method based on the linear programming formulation of RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T11:45:23Z)
• On Instance-Dependent Bounds for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation [80.86358123230757]
  We present an algorithm called Bootstrapped and Constrained Pessimistic Value Iteration (BCP-VI) Under a partial data coverage assumption, BCP-VI yields a fast rate of $tildemathcalO(frac1K)$ for offline RL when there is a positive gap in the optimal Q-value functions. These are the first $tildemathcalO(frac1K)$ bound and absolute zero sub-optimality bound respectively for offline RL with linear function approximation from adaptive data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T18:50:44Z)
• Optimal Conservative Offline RL with General Function Approximation via Augmented Lagrangian [18.2080757218886]
  offline reinforcement learning (RL) refers to decision-making from a previously-collected dataset of interactions. We present the first set of offline RL algorithms that are statistically optimal and practical under general function approximation and single-policy concentrability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T19:28:48Z)
• Best Policy Identification in Linear MDPs [70.57916977441262]
  We investigate the problem of best identification in discounted linear Markov+Delta Decision in the fixed confidence setting under a generative model. The lower bound as the solution of an intricate non- optimization program can be used as the starting point to devise such algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T04:12:50Z)
• Near-Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Constrained MDPs [25.509556551558834]
  We provide minimax upper and lower bounds on the sample complexity for learning near-optimal policies in a discounted CMDP. We show that learning CMDPs is as easy as MDPs when small constraint violations are allowed, but inherently more difficult when we demand zero constraint violation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T15:58:14Z)
• Pessimism in the Face of Confounders: Provably Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes [99.26864533035454]
  We study offline reinforcement learning (RL) in partially observable Markov decision processes. We propose the underlineProxy variable underlinePessimistic underlinePolicy underlineOptimization (textttP3O) algorithm. textttP3O is the first provably efficient offline RL algorithm for POMDPs with a confounded dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-26T19:13:55Z)
• Settling the Sample Complexity of Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning [50.5790774201146]
  offline reinforcement learning (RL) learns using pre-collected data without further exploration. Prior algorithms or analyses either suffer from suboptimal sample complexities or incur high burn-in cost to reach sample optimality. We demonstrate that the model-based (or "plug-in") approach achieves minimax-optimal sample complexity without burn-in cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T17:26:19Z)
• Towards Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning: Lower Bound and Optimality [141.89413461337324]
  Deployment efficiency is an important criterion for many real-world applications of reinforcement learning (RL) We propose a theoretical formulation for deployment-efficient RL (DE-RL) from an "optimization with constraints" perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T01:31:46Z)
• Reward-Free RL is No Harder Than Reward-Aware RL in Linear Markov Decision Processes [61.11090361892306]
  Reward-free reinforcement learning (RL) considers the setting where the agent does not have access to a reward function during exploration. We show that this separation does not exist in the setting of linear MDPs. We develop a computationally efficient algorithm for reward-free RL in a $d$-dimensional linear MDP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T22:09:59Z)
• Offline Reinforcement Learning: Fundamental Barriers for Value Function Approximation [74.3002974673248]
  We consider the offline reinforcement learning problem, where the aim is to learn a decision making policy from logged data. offline RL is becoming increasingly relevant in practice, because online data collection is well suited to safety-critical domains. Our results show that sample-efficient offline reinforcement learning requires either restrictive coverage conditions or representation conditions that go beyond complexity learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-21T23:22:37Z)
• Pessimistic Model-based Offline RL: PAC Bounds and Posterior Sampling under Partial Coverage [33.766012922307084]
  We study model-based offline Reinforcement Learning with general function approximation. We present an algorithm named Constrained Policy Optimization (CPPO) which leverages a general function class and uses a constraint to encode pessimism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-13T16:30:01Z)
• Model-Based Multi-Agent RL in Zero-Sum Markov Games with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity [67.02490430380415]
  We show that model-based MARL achieves a sample complexity of $tilde O(|S||B|(gamma)-3epsilon-2)$ for finding the Nash equilibrium (NE) value up to some $epsilon$ error. We also show that such a sample bound is minimax-optimal (up to logarithmic factors) if the algorithm is reward-agnostic, where the algorithm queries state transition samples without reward knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-15T03:25:24Z)
• Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model [50.38446482252857]
  This paper is concerned with the sample efficiency of reinforcement learning, assuming access to a generative model (or simulator) We first consider $gamma$-discounted infinite-horizon Markov decision processes (MDPs) with state space $mathcalS$ and action space $mathcalA$. We prove that a plain model-based planning algorithm suffices to achieve minimax-optimal sample complexity given any target accuracy level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T17:53:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.