Safe MDP Planning by Learning Temporal Patterns of Undesirable Trajectories and Averting Negative Side Effects

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03081v1
• Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 14:03:24 GMT
• Title: Safe MDP Planning by Learning Temporal Patterns of Undesirable Trajectories and Averting Negative Side Effects
• Authors: Siow Meng Low, Akshat Kumar, Scott Sanner
• Abstract summary: In safe MDP planning, a cost function based on the current state and action is often used to specify safety aspects. operating based on an incomplete model can often produce unintended negative side effects (NSEs)
• Score: 27.41101006357176
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In safe MDP planning, a cost function based on the current state and action is often used to specify safety aspects. In the real world, often the state representation used may lack sufficient fidelity to specify such safety constraints. Operating based on an incomplete model can often produce unintended negative side effects (NSEs). To address these challenges, first, we associate safety signals with state-action trajectories (rather than just an immediate state-action). This makes our safety model highly general. We also assume categorical safety labels are given for different trajectories, rather than a numerical cost function, which is harder to specify by the problem designer. We then employ a supervised learning model to learn such non-Markovian safety patterns. Second, we develop a Lagrange multiplier method, which incorporates the safety model and the underlying MDP model in a single computation graph to facilitate agent learning of safe behaviors. Finally, our empirical results on a variety of discrete and continuous domains show that this approach can satisfy complex non-Markovian safety constraints while optimizing an agent's total returns, is highly scalable, and is also better than the previous best approach for Markovian NSEs.

Related papers

• What Makes and Breaks Safety Fine-tuning? A Mechanistic Study [64.9691741899956]
  Safety fine-tuning helps align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences for their safe deployment. We design a synthetic data generation framework that captures salient aspects of an unsafe input. Using this, we investigate three well-known safety fine-tuning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T16:12:57Z)
• Refuse Whenever You Feel Unsafe: Improving Safety in LLMs via Decoupled Refusal Training [67.30423823744506]
  This study addresses a critical gap in safety tuning practices for Large Language Models (LLMs) We introduce a novel approach, Decoupled Refusal Training (DeRTa), designed to empower LLMs to refuse compliance to harmful prompts at any response position. DeRTa incorporates two novel components: (1) Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Harmful Response Prefix, which trains models to recognize and avoid unsafe content by appending a segment of harmful response to the beginning of a safe response, and (2) Reinforced Transition Optimization (RTO), which equips models with the ability to transition from potential harm to safety refusal consistently throughout the harmful
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T09:36:33Z)
• SafeAligner: Safety Alignment against Jailbreak Attacks via Response Disparity Guidance [48.80398992974831]
  SafeAligner is a methodology implemented at the decoding stage to fortify defenses against jailbreak attacks. We develop two specialized models: the Sentinel Model, which is trained to foster safety, and the Intruder Model, designed to generate riskier responses. We show that SafeAligner can increase the likelihood of beneficial tokens, while reducing the occurrence of harmful ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T07:15:44Z)
• Navigating the Safety Landscape: Measuring Risks in Finetuning Large Language Models [65.06446825020578]
  Safety alignment is crucial to ensure that large language models (LLMs) behave in ways that align with human preferences and prevent harmful actions during inference. We aim to measure the risks in finetuning LLMs through navigating the LLM safety landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T17:31:56Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Non-Markovian Safety Constraints [15.904640266226023]
  We design a safety model that performs credit assignment to assess contributions of partial state-action trajectories on safety. We derive an effective algorithm for optimizing a safe policy using the learned safety model. We devise a method to dynamically adapt the tradeoff coefficient between safety reward and safety compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-05T17:27:22Z)
• Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning [53.10194953873209]
  We show how to leverage proxy criticality metrics to generate safety margins. We evaluate our approach on learned policies from APE-X and A3C within an Atari environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T16:49:54Z)
• On the Safety of Interpretable Machine Learning: A Maximum Deviation Approach [42.31002956593477]
  Interpretable and explainable machine learning has seen a recent surge of interest. We focus on safety as a key motivation behind the surge and make the relationship between interpretability and safety more quantitative. We present case studies, including one on mortgage approval, to illustrate our methods and the insights about models that may be obtained from deviation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T21:57:24Z)
• Log Barriers for Safe Black-box Optimization with Application to Safe Reinforcement Learning [72.97229770329214]
  We introduce a general approach for seeking high dimensional non-linear optimization problems in which maintaining safety during learning is crucial. Our approach called LBSGD is based on applying a logarithmic barrier approximation with a carefully chosen step size. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on minimizing violation in policy tasks in safe reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T11:14:47Z)
• Fail-Safe Adversarial Generative Imitation Learning [9.594432031144716]
  We propose a safety layer that enables a closed-form probability density/gradient of the safe generative continuous policy, end-to-end generative adversarial training, and worst-case safety guarantees. The safety layer maps all actions into a set of safe actions, and uses the change-of-variables formula plus additivity of measures for the density. In an experiment on real-world driver interaction data, we empirically demonstrate tractability, safety and imitation performance of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T13:03:06Z)
• Lyapunov-based uncertainty-aware safe reinforcement learning [0.0]
  InReinforcement learning (RL) has shown a promising performance in learning optimal policies for a variety of sequential decision-making tasks. In many real-world RL problems, besides optimizing the main objectives, the agent is expected to satisfy a certain level of safety. We propose a Lyapunov-based uncertainty-aware safe RL model to address these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-29T13:08:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.