ItyFuzz: Snapshot-Based Fuzzer for Smart Contract

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.17135v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:36:08 GMT
• Title: ItyFuzz: Snapshot-Based Fuzzer for Smart Contract
• Authors: Chaofan Shou, Shangyin Tan, Koushik Sen
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel snapshot-based fuzzer ItyFuzz for testing smart contracts. In ItyFuzz, instead of storing sequences of transactions and mutating from them, we snapshot states and singleton transactions. ItyFuzz outperforms existing fuzzers in terms of instructional coverage and can find and generate realistic exploits for on-chain projects quickly.
• Score: 5.43042231820643
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Smart contracts are critical financial instruments, and their security is of utmost importance. However, smart contract programs are difficult to fuzz due to the persistent blockchain state behind all transactions. Mutating sequences of transactions are complex and often lead to a suboptimal exploration for both input and program spaces. In this paper, we introduce a novel snapshot-based fuzzer ItyFuzz for testing smart contracts. In ItyFuzz, instead of storing sequences of transactions and mutating from them, we snapshot states and singleton transactions. To explore interesting states, ItyFuzz introduces a dataflow waypoint mechanism to identify states with more potential momentum. ItyFuzz also incorporates comparison waypoints to prune the space of states. By maintaining snapshots of the states, ItyFuzz can synthesize concrete exploits like reentrancy attacks quickly. Because ItyFuzz has second-level response time to test a smart contract, it can be used for on-chain testing, which has many benefits compared to local development testing. Finally, we evaluate ItyFuzz on real-world smart contracts and some hacked on-chain DeFi projects. ItyFuzz outperforms existing fuzzers in terms of instructional coverage and can find and generate realistic exploits for on-chain projects quickly.

Related papers

• LogiCity: Advancing Neuro-Symbolic AI with Abstract Urban Simulation [60.920536939067524]
  We introduce LogiCity, the first simulator based on customizable first-order logic (FOL) for an urban-like environment with multiple dynamic agents. LogiCity models diverse urban elements using semantic and spatial concepts, such as IsAmbulance(X) and IsClose(X, Y) Key feature of LogiCity is its support for user-configurable abstractions, enabling customizable simulation complexities for logical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T17:59:46Z)
• G-Fuzz: A Directed Fuzzing Framework for gVisor [48.85077340822625]
  G-Fuzz is a directed fuzzing framework for gVisor. G-Fuzz has been deployed in industry and has detected multiple serious vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-20T01:00:22Z)
• DogeFuzz: A Simple Yet Efficient Grey-box Fuzzer for Ethereum Smart Contracts [38.770693229208355]
  We present DogeFuzz, an infrastructure for fuzzing smart contracts. We compare DogeFuzz with state-of-the-art fuzzers for smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T11:08:53Z)
• Vulseye: Detect Smart Contract Vulnerabilities via Stateful Directed Graybox Fuzzing [15.974697197575304]
  Vulseye is a stateful directed graybox fuzzer for smart contracts guided by vulnerabilities. We introduce Code Targets and State Targets into fuzzing loops as the testing targets of Vulseye. In comparison with state-of-the-art fuzzers, Vulseye demonstrated superior effectiveness and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T16:03:03Z)
• Effective Targeted Testing of Smart Contracts [0.0]
  Since smart contracts are immutable, their bugs cannot be fixed, which may lead to significant monetary losses. Our framework, Griffin, tackles this deficiency by employing a targeted symbolic execution technique for generating test data. This paper discusses how smart contracts differ from legacy software in targeted symbolic execution and how these differences can affect the tool structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T04:38:11Z)
• Vulnerabilities of smart contracts and mitigation schemes: A Comprehensive Survey [0.6554326244334866]
  This paper presents a literature review combined with an experimental report that aims to assist developers in developing secure smarts. It provides a list of frequent vulnerabilities and corresponding mitigation solutions. It evaluates the community most widely used tools by executing and testing them on sample smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T19:36:53Z)
• Vulnerability Scanners for Ethereum Smart Contracts: A Large-Scale Study [44.25093111430751]
  In 2023 alone, such vulnerabilities led to substantial financial losses exceeding a billion of US dollars. Various tools have been developed to detect and mitigate vulnerabilities in smart contracts. This study investigates the gap between the effectiveness of existing security scanners and the vulnerabilities that still persist in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T11:26:26Z)
• MuFuzz: Sequence-Aware Mutation and Seed Mask Guidance for Blockchain Smart Contract Fuzzing [19.606053533275958]
  We develop a sequence-aware mutation and seed mask guidance strategy for smart contract fuzzing. We implement our designs into a new smart contract fuzzer named MuFuzz, and extensively evaluate it on three benchmarks. Overall, MuFuzz achieves higher branch coverage than state-of-the-art fuzzers (up to 25%) and detects 30% more bugs than existing bug detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T18:32:19Z)
• Formally Verifying a Real World Smart Contract [52.30656867727018]
  We search for a tool capable of formally verifying a real-world smart contract written in a recent version of Solidity. In this article, we present our search for a tool capable of formally verifying a real-world smart contract written in a recent version of Solidity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T14:30:21Z)
• Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection: From Pure Neural Network to Interpretable Graph Feature and Expert Pattern Fusion [48.744359070088166]
  Conventional smart contract vulnerability detection methods heavily rely on fixed expert rules. Recent deep learning approaches alleviate this issue but fail to encode useful expert knowledge. We develop automatic tools to extract expert patterns from the source code. We then cast the code into a semantic graph to extract deep graph features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T07:12:13Z)
• ESCORT: Ethereum Smart COntRacTs Vulnerability Detection using Deep Neural Network and Transfer Learning [80.85273827468063]
  Existing machine learning-based vulnerability detection methods are limited and only inspect whether the smart contract is vulnerable. We propose ESCORT, the first Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based vulnerability detection framework for smart contracts. We show that ESCORT achieves an average F1-score of 95% on six vulnerability types and the detection time is 0.02 seconds per contract.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T15:04:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.