Fedward: Flexible Federated Backdoor Defense Framework with Non-IID Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00356v1
• Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2023 15:01:03 GMT
• Title: Fedward: Flexible Federated Backdoor Defense Framework with Non-IID Data
• Authors: Zekai Chen, Fuyi Wang, Zhiwei Zheng, Ximeng Liu, Yujie Lin
• Abstract summary: adversaries can manipulate datasets and upload models by injecting triggers for federated backdoor attacks. Existing defense strategies consider specific and limited attacker models, and a sufficient amount of noise to be injected only mitigates. We introduce a Flexible Federated Backdoor Defense Framework (Fedward) to ensure the elimination of backdoors.
• Score: 14.160225621129076
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train deep learning models while considering sensitive local datasets' privacy. However, adversaries can manipulate datasets and upload models by injecting triggers for federated backdoor attacks (FBA). Existing defense strategies against FBA consider specific and limited attacker models, and a sufficient amount of noise to be injected only mitigates rather than eliminates FBA. To address these deficiencies, we introduce a Flexible Federated Backdoor Defense Framework (Fedward) to ensure the elimination of adversarial backdoors. We decompose FBA into various attacks, and design amplified magnitude sparsification (AmGrad) and adaptive OPTICS clustering (AutoOPTICS) to address each attack. Meanwhile, Fedward uses the adaptive clipping method by regarding the number of samples in the benign group as constraints on the boundary. This ensures that Fedward can maintain the performance for the Non-IID scenario. We conduct experimental evaluations over three benchmark datasets and thoroughly compare them to state-of-the-art studies. The results demonstrate the promising defense performance from Fedward, moderately improved by 33% $\sim$ 75 in clustering defense methods, and 96.98%, 90.74%, and 89.8% for Non-IID to the utmost extent for the average FBA success rate over MNIST, FMNIST, and CIFAR10, respectively.

Related papers

• Towards Robust Federated Learning via Logits Calibration on Non-IID Data [49.286558007937856]
  Federated learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving distributed management framework based on collaborative model training of distributed devices in edge networks. Recent studies have shown that FL is vulnerable to adversarial examples, leading to a significant drop in its performance. In this work, we adopt the adversarial training (AT) framework to improve the robustness of FL models against adversarial example (AE) attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T09:18:29Z)
• FreqFed: A Frequency Analysis-Based Approach for Mitigating Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning [98.43475653490219]
  Federated learning (FL) is susceptible to poisoning attacks. FreqFed is a novel aggregation mechanism that transforms the model updates into the frequency domain. We demonstrate that FreqFed can mitigate poisoning attacks effectively with a negligible impact on the utility of the aggregated model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T16:56:24Z)
• FedDefender: Backdoor Attack Defense in Federated Learning [0.0]
  Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving distributed machine learning technique. We propose FedDefender, a defense mechanism against targeted poisoning attacks in FL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-02T03:40:04Z)
• G$^2$uardFL: Safeguarding Federated Learning Against Backdoor Attacks through Attributed Client Graph Clustering [116.4277292854053]
  Federated Learning (FL) offers collaborative model training without data sharing. FL is vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where poisoned model weights lead to compromised system integrity. We present G$2$uardFL, a protective framework that reinterprets the identification of malicious clients as an attributed graph clustering problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:15:04Z)
• FedVal: Different good or different bad in federated learning [9.558549875692808]
  Federated learning (FL) systems are susceptible to attacks from malicious actors. FL poses new challenges in addressing group bias, such as ensuring fair performance for different demographic groups. Traditional methods used to address such biases require centralized access to the data, which FL systems do not have. We present a novel approach FedVal for both robustness and fairness that does not require any additional information from clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T22:11:13Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• Combating Exacerbated Heterogeneity for Robust Models in Federated Learning [91.88122934924435]
  Combination of adversarial training and federated learning can lead to the undesired robustness deterioration. We propose a novel framework called Slack Federated Adversarial Training (SFAT) We verify the rationality and effectiveness of SFAT on various benchmarked and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T06:16:15Z)
• FedCC: Robust Federated Learning against Model Poisoning Attacks [0.0]
  Federated Learning is designed to address privacy concerns in learning models. New distributed paradigm safeguards data privacy but differentiates the attack surface due to the server's inaccessibility to local datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T01:52:32Z)
• FLIP: A Provable Defense Framework for Backdoor Mitigation in Federated Learning [66.56240101249803]
  We study how hardening benign clients can affect the global model (and the malicious clients) We propose a trigger reverse engineering based defense and show that our method can achieve improvement with guarantee robustness. Our results on eight competing SOTA defense methods show the empirical superiority of our method on both single-shot and continuous FL backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T22:24:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.