Limitations of probabilistic error cancellation for open dynamics beyond
sampling overhead
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01446v2
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:42:15 GMT
- Title: Limitations of probabilistic error cancellation for open dynamics beyond
sampling overhead
- Authors: Yue Ma and M. S. Kim
- Abstract summary: Methods such as probabilistic error cancellation rely on discretizing the evolution into finite time steps and applying the mitigation layer after each time step.
This may lead to Trotter-like errors in the simulation results even if the error mitigation is implemented ideally.
We show that, they are determined by the commutating relations between the superoperators of the unitary part, the device noise part and the noise part of the open dynamics to be simulated.
- Score: 1.1864834557465163
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Quantum simulation of dynamics is an important goal in the NISQ era, within
which quantum error mitigation may be a viable path towards modifying or
eliminating the effects of noise. Most studies on quantum error mitigation have
been focused on the resource cost due to its exponential scaling in the circuit
depth. Methods such as probabilistic error cancellation rely on discretizing
the evolution into finite time steps and applying the mitigation layer after
each time step, modifying only the noise part without any
Hamiltonian-dependence. This may lead to Trotter-like errors in the simulation
results even if the error mitigation is implemented ideally, which means that
the number of samples is taken as infinite. Here we analyze the aforementioned
errors which have been largely neglected before. We show that, they are
determined by the commutating relations between the superoperators of the
unitary part, the device noise part and the noise part of the open dynamics to
be simulated. We include both digital quantum simulation and analog quantum
simulation setups, and consider defining the ideal error mitigation map both by
exactly inverting the noise channel and by approximating it to the first order
in the time step. We take single-qubit toy models to numerically demonstrate
our findings. Our results illustrate fundamental limitations of applying
probabilistic error cancellation in a stepwise manner to continuous dynamics,
thus motivating the investigations of truly time-continuous error cancellation
methods.
Related papers
- Stochastic Error Cancellation in Analog Quantum Simulation [0.6410191755165466]
We consider an error model in which the actual Hamiltonian of the simulator differs from the target Hamiltonian.
We show that, due to error cancellation, the error scales as the square root of the number of qubits instead of linearly.
We also show that error cancellation also manifests in the fidelity between the target state at the end of time-evolution and the actual state we obtain in the presence of noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-24T19:25:08Z) - Compressed quantum error mitigation [0.0]
We introduce a quantum error mitigation technique based on probabilistic error cancellation to eliminate errors which have accumulated during the application of a quantum circuit.
For a simple noise model, we show that efficient, local denoisers can be found, and we demonstrate their effectiveness for the digital quantum simulation of the time evolution of simple spin chains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-10T19:00:02Z) - Error Mitigation Thresholds in Noisy Random Quantum Circuits [0.30723404270319693]
We study the robustness of probabilistic error cancellation and tensor network error mitigation when the noise is imperfectly characterized.
For one-dimensional circuits, error mitigation fails at an $mathcalO(1)$ time for any imperfection in the characterization of disorder.
We discuss further implications for tests of quantum computational advantage, fault-tolerant probes of measurement-induced phase transitions, and quantum algorithms in near-term devices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-08T19:00:01Z) - Importance sampling for stochastic quantum simulations [68.8204255655161]
We introduce the qDrift protocol, which builds random product formulas by sampling from the Hamiltonian according to the coefficients.
We show that the simulation cost can be reduced while achieving the same accuracy, by considering the individual simulation cost during the sampling stage.
Results are confirmed by numerical simulations performed on a lattice nuclear effective field theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-12T15:06:32Z) - Probing finite-temperature observables in quantum simulators of spin
systems with short-time dynamics [62.997667081978825]
We show how finite-temperature observables can be obtained with an algorithm motivated from the Jarzynski equality.
We show that a finite temperature phase transition in the long-range transverse field Ising model can be characterized in trapped ion quantum simulators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-03T18:00:02Z) - The Accuracy vs. Sampling Overhead Trade-off in Quantum Error Mitigation
Using Monte Carlo-Based Channel Inversion [84.66087478797475]
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is a class of promising techniques for reducing the computational error of variational quantum algorithms.
We consider a practical channel inversion strategy based on Monte Carlo sampling, which introduces additional computational error.
We show that when the computational error is small compared to the dynamic range of the error-free results, it scales with the square root of the number of gates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-20T00:05:01Z) - Simulating the Mott transition on a noisy digital quantum computer via
Cartan-based fast-forwarding circuits [62.73367618671969]
Dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) maps the local Green's function of the Hubbard model to that of the Anderson impurity model.
Quantum and hybrid quantum-classical algorithms have been proposed to efficiently solve impurity models.
This work presents the first computation of the Mott phase transition using noisy digital quantum hardware.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-10T17:32:15Z) - Quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics: A performance study on the
spin-boson model [68.8204255655161]
Quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics simulations are traditionally based on implementing a Trotter-approximation of the time-evolution operator.
variational quantum algorithms have become an indispensable alternative, enabling small-scale simulations on present-day hardware.
We show that, despite providing a clear reduction of quantum gate cost, the variational method in its current implementation is unlikely to lead to a quantum advantage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-09T18:00:05Z) - Continuous-time dynamics and error scaling of noisy highly-entangling
quantum circuits [58.720142291102135]
We simulate a noisy quantum Fourier transform processor with up to 21 qubits.
We take into account microscopic dissipative processes rather than relying on digital error models.
We show that depending on the dissipative mechanisms at play, the choice of input state has a strong impact on the performance of the quantum algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T14:55:44Z) - Multi-exponential Error Extrapolation and Combining Error Mitigation
Techniques for NISQ Applications [0.0]
Noise in quantum hardware remains the biggest roadblock for the implementation of quantum computers.
Error extrapolation is an error mitigation technique that has been successfully implemented experimentally.
We extend this to multi-exponential error extrapolation and provide more rigorous proof for its effectiveness under Pauli noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-02T17:18:47Z) - Mitigating realistic noise in practical noisy intermediate-scale quantum
devices [0.5872014229110214]
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is vital for noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices.
Most conventional QEM schemes assume discrete gate-based circuits with noise appearing either before or after each gate.
We show it can be effectively suppressed by a novel QEM method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-14T16:51:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.