Relational Quantum Mechanics and Contextuality
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.08922v2
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 09:45:49 GMT
- Title: Relational Quantum Mechanics and Contextuality
- Authors: Calum J. Robson
- Abstract summary: I discuss the hypothesis that RQM follows contextuality that changes the system.
I then examine how the approach of quantum logic in formal histories can be used to clarify which information about a system can be shared between different observers.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper discusses several issues around Relational Quantum Mechanics.
First, I discuss possible ontologies underlying the interpretation, before
settling on the hypothesis that RQM follows from contextuality of measurements,
due to quantum measurements changing the system measured. I then examine how
the approach to quantum logic in the consistent histories formalism can be used
to clarify which information about a system can be shared between different
observers. Finally I discuss the similarities and differences between special
relativity and RQM.
Related papers
- Quantifying High-Order Interdependencies in Entangled Quantum States [43.70611649100949]
We introduce the Q-information: an information-theoretic measure capable of distinguishing quantum states dominated by synergy or redundancy.
We show that quantum systems need at least four variables to exhibit high-order properties.
Overall, the Q-information sheds light on novel aspects of the internal organisation of quantum systems and their time evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T17:00:13Z) - Quantum state inference from coarse-grained descriptions: analysis and
an application to quantum thermodynamics [101.18253437732933]
We compare the Maximum Entropy Principle method, with the recently proposed Average Assignment Map method.
Despite the fact that the assigned descriptions respect the measured constraints, the descriptions differ in scenarios that go beyond the traditional system-environment structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-16T19:42:24Z) - Fact-nets: towards a mathematical framework for relational quantum
mechanics [0.0]
The relational interpretation of quantum mechanics (RQM) has received a growing interest since its first formulation in 1996.
This paper proposes a radical reformulation of the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics which is relational from the start: fact-nets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-01T10:27:38Z) - Incompatible measurements in quantum information science [0.0]
Joint measurability and incompatibility are reviewed from the perspective of quantum information science.
An overview on applications of incompatibility, such as in measurement uncertainty relations.
Emerging directions of research, such as a resource theory of incompatibility, as well as other concepts to grasp the nature of measurements in quantum mechanics are discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-13T16:48:28Z) - The Relational Interpretation of Quantum Physics [0.0]
RQM's technical core is the realisation that quantum transition amplitudes determine physical probabilities only when their arguments are facts relative to the same system.
RQM's technical core is the realisation that quantum transition amplitudes determine physical probabilities only when their arguments are facts relative to the same system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-19T17:22:25Z) - From geometry to coherent dissipative dynamics in quantum mechanics [68.8204255655161]
We work out the case of finite-level systems, for which it is shown by means of the corresponding contact master equation.
We describe quantum decays in a 2-level system as coherent and continuous processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-29T18:27:38Z) - Qubits are not observers -- a no-go theorem [0.0]
The relational approach to quantum states asserts that the physical description of quantum systems is always relative to something or someone.
We show, in the form of a no-go theorem, that in RQM the physical description of a system relative to an observer cannot represent knowledge about the observer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T22:48:16Z) - A quintet of quandaries: five no-go theorems for Relational Quantum
Mechanics [0.0]
RQM strives to uphold the completeness and universality of quantum theory.
Here we present five nogos that imply it cannot; something has to give way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-01T18:00:15Z) - Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same.
Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles.
We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z) - Equivalence of approaches to relational quantum dynamics in relativistic
settings [68.8204255655161]
We show that the trinity' of relational quantum dynamics holds in relativistic settings per frequency superselection sector.
We ascribe the time according to the clock subsystem to a POVM which is covariant with respect to its (quadratic) Hamiltonian.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-01T16:12:24Z) - Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations.
We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.