The Responsible Development of Automated Student Feedback with Generative AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15334v2
• Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 06:36:22 GMT
• Title: The Responsible Development of Automated Student Feedback with Generative AI
• Authors: Euan D Lindsay, Mike Zhang, Aditya Johri, Johannes Bjerva,
• Abstract summary: This paper identifies four critical ethical considerations for implementing generative AI tools to provide automated feedback to students. The goal of this work is to enable the use of AI systems to automate mundane assessment and feedback tasks, without introducing a "tyranny of the majority"
• Score: 6.008616775722921
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Contribution: This paper identifies four critical ethical considerations for implementing generative AI tools to provide automated feedback to students. Background: Providing rich feedback to students is essential for supporting student learning. Recent advances in generative AI, particularly with large language models (LLMs), provide the opportunity to deliver repeatable, scalable and instant automatically generated feedback to students, making abundant a previously scarce and expensive learning resource. Such an approach is feasible from a technical perspective due to these recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP); while the potential upside is a strong motivator, doing so introduces a range of potential ethical issues that must be considered as we apply these technologies. Intended Outcomes: The goal of this work is to enable the use of AI systems to automate mundane assessment and feedback tasks, without introducing a "tyranny of the majority", where the needs of minorities in the long tail are overlooked because they are difficult to automate. Application Design: This paper applies an extant ethical framework used for AI and machine learning to the specific challenge of providing automated feedback to student engineers. The task is considered from both a development and maintenance perspective, considering how automated feedback tools will evolve and be used over time. Findings: This paper identifies four key ethical considerations for the implementation of automated feedback for students: Participation, Development, Impact on Learning and Evolution over Time.

Related papers

• AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans [54.19152688545896]
  There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness. The research, design, deployment, and availability of such AI systems have prompted growing concerns about a wide range of possible legal, ethical, and other social impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:55:38Z)
• AI in Education: Rationale, Principles, and Instructional Implications [0.0]
  Generative AI, like ChatGPT, can create human-like content, prompting questions about its educational role. The study emphasizes deliberate strategies to ensure AI complements, not replaces, genuine cognitive effort.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T14:08:07Z)
• Human-Centric eXplainable AI in Education [0.0]
  This paper explores Human-Centric eXplainable AI (HCXAI) in the educational landscape. It emphasizes its role in enhancing learning outcomes, fostering trust among users, and ensuring transparency in AI-driven tools. It outlines comprehensive frameworks for developing HCXAI systems that prioritize user understanding and engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T14:02:47Z)
• Generative AI and Its Impact on Personalized Intelligent Tutoring Systems [0.0]
  Generative AI enables personalized education through dynamic content generation, real-time feedback, and adaptive learning pathways. Report explores key applications such as automated question generation, customized feedback mechanisms, and interactive dialogue systems. Future directions highlight the potential advancements in multimodal AI integration, emotional intelligence in tutoring systems, and the ethical implications of AI-driven education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T16:01:01Z)
• Could ChatGPT get an Engineering Degree? Evaluating Higher Education Vulnerability to AI Assistants [175.9723801486487]
  We evaluate whether two AI assistants, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, can adequately answer assessment questions. GPT-4 answers an average of 65.8% of questions correctly, and can even produce the correct answer across at least one prompting strategy for 85.1% of questions. Our results call for revising program-level assessment design in higher education in light of advances in generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T12:11:49Z)
• Human-Centered Automation [0.3626013617212666]
  The paper argues for the emerging area of Human-Centered Automation (HCA), which prioritizes user needs and preferences in the design and development of automation systems. The paper discusses the limitations of existing automation approaches, the challenges in integrating AI and RPA, and the benefits of human-centered automation for productivity, innovation, and democratizing access to these technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T22:12:28Z)
• Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students Written Assessment [2.8078480738404]
  Key challenge exists in ensuring that humans are equipped with the required critical thinking and AI literacy skills. This paper provides a first step toward conceptualizing the notion of critical learner interaction with AI. Using both theoretical models and empirical data, our preliminary findings suggest a general lack of Deep interaction with AI during the writing process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T12:12:50Z)
• AI-Tutoring in Software Engineering Education [0.7631288333466648]
  We conducted an exploratory case study by integrating the GPT-3.5-Turbo model as an AI-Tutor within the APAS Artemis. The findings highlight advantages, such as timely feedback and scalability. However, challenges like generic responses and students' concerns about a learning progress inhibition when using the AI-Tutor were also evident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T08:15:08Z)
• Exploration with Principles for Diverse AI Supervision [88.61687950039662]
  Training large transformers using next-token prediction has given rise to groundbreaking advancements in AI. While this generative AI approach has produced impressive results, it heavily leans on human supervision. This strong reliance on human oversight poses a significant hurdle to the advancement of AI innovation. We propose a novel paradigm termed Exploratory AI (EAI) aimed at autonomously generating high-quality training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:03:39Z)
• ActiveAI: Introducing AI Literacy for Middle School Learners with Goal-based Scenario Learning [0.0]
  The ActiveAI project addresses key challenges in AI education for grades 7-9 students. The app incorporates a variety of learner inputs like sliders, steppers, and collectors to enhance understanding. The project is currently in the implementation stage, leveraging the intelligent tutor design principles for app development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T11:43:43Z)
• A Survey on Brain-Inspired Deep Learning via Predictive Coding [85.93245078403875]
  Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks. PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z)
• Assigning AI: Seven Approaches for Students, with Prompts [0.0]
  This paper examines the transformative role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in education and their potential as learning tools. The authors propose seven approaches for utilizing AI in classrooms: AI-tutor, AI-coach, AI-mentor, AI-teammate, AI-tool, AI-simulator, and AI-student.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:36:36Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• Deep Active Learning for Computer Vision: Past and Future [50.19394935978135]
  Despite its indispensable role for developing AI models, research on active learning is not as intensive as other research directions. By addressing data automation challenges and coping with automated machine learning systems, active learning will facilitate democratization of AI technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-27T13:07:14Z)
• Enabling Automated Machine Learning for Model-Driven AI Engineering [60.09869520679979]
  We propose a novel approach to enable Model-Driven Software Engineering and Model-Driven AI Engineering. In particular, we support Automated ML, thus assisting software engineers without deep AI knowledge in developing AI-intensive systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-06T10:12:56Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Modelos din\^amicos aplicados \`a aprendizagem de valores em intelig\^encia artificial [0.0]
  Several researchers in the area have developed a robust, beneficial, and safe concept of AI for the preservation of humanity and the environment. It is utmost importance that artificial intelligent agents have their values aligned with human values. Perhaps this difficulty comes from the way we are addressing the problem of expressing values using cognitive methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-30T00:56:11Z)
• Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research Challenges [80.39805582015133]
  We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI) Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently. We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.