The Responsible Development of Automated Student Feedback with Generative AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.15334v3
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:49:52 GMT
- Title: The Responsible Development of Automated Student Feedback with Generative AI
- Authors: Euan D Lindsay, Mike Zhang, Aditya Johri, Johannes Bjerva,
- Abstract summary: Recent advancements in AI, particularly with large language models (LLMs), present new opportunities to deliver scalable, repeatable, and instant feedback.
However, implementing these technologies also introduces a host of ethical considerations that must thoughtfully be addressed.
One of the core advantages of AI systems is their ability to automate routine and mundane tasks, potentially freeing up human educators for more nuanced work.
However, the ease of automation risks a tyranny of the majority'', where the diverse needs of minority or unique learners are overlooked.
- Score: 6.008616775722921
- License:
- Abstract: Providing rich, constructive feedback to students is essential for supporting and enhancing their learning. Recent advancements in Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly with large language models (LLMs), present new opportunities to deliver scalable, repeatable, and instant feedback, effectively making abundant a resource that has historically been scarce and costly. From a technical perspective, this approach is now feasible due to breakthroughs in AI and Natural Language Processing (NLP). While the potential educational benefits are compelling, implementing these technologies also introduces a host of ethical considerations that must be thoughtfully addressed. One of the core advantages of AI systems is their ability to automate routine and mundane tasks, potentially freeing up human educators for more nuanced work. However, the ease of automation risks a ``tyranny of the majority'', where the diverse needs of minority or unique learners are overlooked, as they may be harder to systematize and less straightforward to accommodate. Ensuring inclusivity and equity in AI-generated feedback, therefore, becomes a critical aspect of responsible AI implementation in education. The process of developing machine learning models that produce valuable, personalized, and authentic feedback also requires significant input from human domain experts. Decisions around whose expertise is incorporated, how it is captured, and when it is applied have profound implications for the relevance and quality of the resulting feedback. Additionally, the maintenance and continuous refinement of these models are necessary to adapt feedback to evolving contextual, theoretical, and student-related factors. Without ongoing adaptation, feedback risks becoming obsolete or mismatched with the current needs of diverse student populations [...]
Related papers
- AI in Education: Rationale, Principles, and Instructional Implications [0.0]
Generative AI, like ChatGPT, can create human-like content, prompting questions about its educational role.
The study emphasizes deliberate strategies to ensure AI complements, not replaces, genuine cognitive effort.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T14:08:07Z) - Human-Centric eXplainable AI in Education [0.0]
This paper explores Human-Centric eXplainable AI (HCXAI) in the educational landscape.
It emphasizes its role in enhancing learning outcomes, fostering trust among users, and ensuring transparency in AI-driven tools.
It outlines comprehensive frameworks for developing HCXAI systems that prioritize user understanding and engagement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T14:02:47Z) - Generative AI and Its Impact on Personalized Intelligent Tutoring Systems [0.0]
Generative AI enables personalized education through dynamic content generation, real-time feedback, and adaptive learning pathways.
Report explores key applications such as automated question generation, customized feedback mechanisms, and interactive dialogue systems.
Future directions highlight the potential advancements in multimodal AI integration, emotional intelligence in tutoring systems, and the ethical implications of AI-driven education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T16:01:01Z) - Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students Written Assessment [2.8078480738404]
Key challenge exists in ensuring that humans are equipped with the required critical thinking and AI literacy skills.
This paper provides a first step toward conceptualizing the notion of critical learner interaction with AI.
Using both theoretical models and empirical data, our preliminary findings suggest a general lack of Deep interaction with AI during the writing process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T12:12:50Z) - Exploration with Principles for Diverse AI Supervision [88.61687950039662]
Training large transformers using next-token prediction has given rise to groundbreaking advancements in AI.
While this generative AI approach has produced impressive results, it heavily leans on human supervision.
This strong reliance on human oversight poses a significant hurdle to the advancement of AI innovation.
We propose a novel paradigm termed Exploratory AI (EAI) aimed at autonomously generating high-quality training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T07:03:39Z) - A Survey on Brain-Inspired Deep Learning via Predictive Coding [85.93245078403875]
Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks.
PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z) - AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance.
We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks.
Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Modelos din\^amicos aplicados \`a aprendizagem de valores em
intelig\^encia artificial [0.0]
Several researchers in the area have developed a robust, beneficial, and safe concept of AI for the preservation of humanity and the environment.
It is utmost importance that artificial intelligent agents have their values aligned with human values.
Perhaps this difficulty comes from the way we are addressing the problem of expressing values using cognitive methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-30T00:56:11Z) - Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research
Challenges [80.39805582015133]
We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI)
Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently.
We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.