Efficient RLHF: Reducing the Memory Usage of PPO

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00754v1
• Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 22:57:20 GMT
• Title: Efficient RLHF: Reducing the Memory Usage of PPO
• Authors: Michael Santacroce, Yadong Lu, Han Yu, Yuanzhi Li, Yelong Shen
• Abstract summary: We present a comprehensive analysis of the memory usage, performance, and training time of memory-savings techniques for PPO. We introduce Hydra-RLHF by first integrating the SFT and Reward models and then dynamically turning LoRA "off" during training. Our results demonstrate that Hydra-PPO is a simple and promising solution for enabling more widespread usage of RLHF.
• Score: 61.45357428856269
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) has revolutionized language modeling by aligning models with human preferences. However, the RL stage, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), requires over 3x the memory of Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), making it infeasible to use for most practitioners. To address this issue, we present a comprehensive analysis the memory usage, performance, and training time of memory-savings techniques for PPO. We introduce Hydra-RLHF by first integrating the SFT and Reward models and then dynamically turning LoRA "off" during training. Our experiments show: 1. Using LoRA during PPO reduces its memory usage to be smaller than SFT while improving alignment across four public benchmarks, and 2. Hydra-PPO reduces the latency per sample of LoRA-PPO by up to 65% while maintaining its performance. Our results demonstrate that Hydra-PPO is a simple and promising solution for enabling more widespread usage of RLHF.

Related papers

• Iterative Nash Policy Optimization: Aligning LLMs with General Preferences via No-Regret Learning [55.65738319966385]
  We propose a novel online algorithm, iterative Nash policy optimization (INPO) Unlike previous methods, INPO bypasses the need for estimating the expected win rate for individual responses. With an LLaMA-3-8B-based SFT model, INPO achieves a 42.6% length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0 and a 37.8% win rate on Arena-Hard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T08:00:34Z)
• Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimization [93.74831404396174]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has been a crucial component in the recent success of Large Language Models. RLHF is know to exploit biases in human preferences, such as verbosity. We develop a principled but simple regularization strategy that prevents length exploitation, while still maintaining improvements in model quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T06:03:47Z)
• Parameter Efficient Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [27.687265760622918]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) effectively aligns pretrained Large Language and Vision-Language Models with human preferences. To alleviate some of the computational burden of fine-tuning, efficient methods, like LoRA were introduced. We benchmark the PE-RLHF setup on six diverse datasets spanning summarization, harmless/helpful response generation, UI automation, and visual question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T21:43:46Z)
• Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs [29.505270680223003]
  AI alignment in the shape of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback is increasingly treated as a crucial ingredient for high performance large language models. Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) has been positioned by recent literature as the canonical method for the RL part of RLHF. We show that many components of PPO are unnecessary in an RLHF context and that simpler REINFORCE-style optimization variants outperform both PPO and newly proposed "RL-free" methods such as DPO and RAFT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T17:52:34Z)
• SuperHF: Supervised Iterative Learning from Human Feedback [20.22920163075946]
  We focus on two prevalent methods used to align large language models, Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) We propose a novel approach, Supervised Iterative Learning from Human Feedback (SuperHF), which seeks to leverage the strengths of both methods. Our experimental results show SuperHF exceeds PPO-based RLHF on the training objective, easily and favorably trades off high reward with low reward hacking, improves downstream calibration, and performs the same on our GPT-4 based qualitative evaluation scheme all the while being significantly simpler to implement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T16:52:00Z)
• ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language Models [30.276168676690045]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is key to aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) We present ReMax, which leverages 3 properties of RLHF: fast simulation, deterministic transitions, and trajectory-level rewards. It is simpler to implement, eliminates more than 4 hyper- parameters in PPO, reduces GPU memory usage, and shortens training time. Applying ReMax to a Mistral-7B model resulted in a 94.78% win rate on the AlpacaEval leaderboard and a 7.739 score on MT-bench, setting a new SOTA for open-source 7B models
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T15:25:14Z)
• Exploring the impact of low-rank adaptation on the performance, efficiency, and regularization of RLHF [47.960563851948514]
  We investigate an efficient implementation of RLHF using low-rank adaptation (LoRA) Our implementation achieves better performance than the publicly-released AlpacaFarm checkpoint with full model fine-tuning. We release our code and pretrained checkpoints to facilitate future research on more efficient RLHF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T17:31:36Z)
• Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPO [81.01936993929127]
  Large language models (LLMs) have formulated a blueprint for the advancement of artificial general intelligence. reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) emerges as the pivotal technological paradigm underpinning this pursuit. In this report, we dissect the framework of RLHF, re-evaluate the inner workings of PPO, and explore how the parts comprising PPO algorithms impact policy agent training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T01:55:24Z)
• Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model [119.65409513119963]
  We introduce a new parameterization of the reward model in RLHF that enables extraction of the corresponding optimal policy in closed form. The resulting algorithm, which we call Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), is stable, performant, and computationally lightweight. Our experiments show that DPO can fine-tune LMs to align with human preferences as well as or better than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T17:57:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.