Large Process Models: Business Process Management in the Age of
Generative AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00900v2
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:25:06 GMT
- Title: Large Process Models: Business Process Management in the Age of
Generative AI
- Authors: Timotheus Kampik, Christian Warmuth, Adrian Rebmann, Ron Agam, Lukas
N.P. Egger, Andreas Gerber, Johannes Hoffart, Jonas Kolk, Philipp Herzig,
Gero Decker, Han van der Aa, Artem Polyvyanyy, Stefanie Rinderle-Ma, Ingo
Weber, Matthias Weidlich
- Abstract summary: Large Process Model (LPM) combines correlation power of Large Language Models with analytical precision and reliability of knowledge-based systems and automated reasoning approaches.
LPM would allow organizations to receive context-specific (tailored) process and other business models, analytical deep-dives, and improvement recommendations.
- Score: 4.249492423406116
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The continued success of Large Language Models (LLMs) and other generative
artificial intelligence approaches highlights the advantages that large
information corpora can have over rigidly defined symbolic models, but also
serves as a proof-point of the challenges that purely statistics-based
approaches have in terms of safety and trustworthiness. As a framework for
contextualizing the potential, as well as the limitations of LLMs and other
foundation model-based technologies, we propose the concept of a Large Process
Model (LPM) that combines the correlation power of LLMs with the analytical
precision and reliability of knowledge-based systems and automated reasoning
approaches. LPMs are envisioned to directly utilize the wealth of process
management experience that experts have accumulated, as well as process
performance data of organizations with diverse characteristics, e.g., regarding
size, region, or industry. In this vision, the proposed LPM would allow
organizations to receive context-specific (tailored) process and other business
models, analytical deep-dives, and improvement recommendations. As such, they
would allow to substantially decrease the time and effort required for business
transformation, while also allowing for deeper, more impactful, and more
actionable insights than previously possible. We argue that implementing an LPM
is feasible, but also highlight limitations and research challenges that need
to be solved to implement particular aspects of the LPM vision.
Related papers
- EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For Exploration [76.66831821738927]
Large language models (LLMs) remain under-studied in scenarios requiring optimal decision-making under uncertainty.
We measure LLMs' (in)ability to make optimal decisions in bandits, a state-less reinforcement learning setting relevant to many applications.
Motivated by the existence of optimal exploration algorithms, we propose efficient ways to integrate this algorithmic knowledge into LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T17:54:03Z) - Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making.
Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations.
Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z) - Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks.
LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning.
We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z) - A Reality check of the benefits of LLM in business [1.9181612035055007]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in language understanding and generation tasks.
This paper thoroughly examines the usefulness and readiness of LLMs for business processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-09T02:36:00Z) - Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Demographic Inference with Large Multimodal Models [58.58594658683919]
Large multimodal models (LMMs) have shown transformative potential across various research tasks.
Our findings indicate LMMs possess advantages in zero-shot learning, interpretability, and handling uncurated 'in-the-wild' inputs.
We propose a Chain-of-Thought augmented prompting approach, which effectively mitigates the off-target prediction issue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-24T16:26:56Z) - Large Language Model Agent as a Mechanical Designer [7.136205674624813]
In this study, we present a novel approach that integrates pre-trained LLMs with a FEM module.
The FEM module evaluates each design and provides essential feedback, guiding the LLMs to continuously learn, plan, generate, and optimize designs without the need for domain-specific training.
Our results reveal that these LLM-based agents can successfully generate truss designs that comply with natural language specifications with a success rate of up to 90%, which varies according to the applied constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-26T16:41:24Z) - Hybrid LLM/Rule-based Approaches to Business Insights Generation from Structured Data [0.0]
The ability to extract actionable insights from vast and varied datasets is essential for informed decision-making and maintaining a competitive edge.
Traditional rule-based systems, while reliable, often fall short when faced with the complexity and dynamism of modern business data.
This paper explores the efficacy of hybrid approaches that integrate the robustness of rule-based systems with the adaptive power of Large Language Models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T02:42:24Z) - Towards Modeling Learner Performance with Large Language Models [7.002923425715133]
This paper investigates whether the pattern recognition and sequence modeling capabilities of LLMs can be extended to the domain of knowledge tracing.
We compare two approaches to using LLMs for this task, zero-shot prompting and model fine-tuning, with existing, non-LLM approaches to knowledge tracing.
While LLM-based approaches do not achieve state-of-the-art performance, fine-tuned LLMs surpass the performance of naive baseline models and perform on par with standard Bayesian Knowledge Tracing approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-29T14:06:34Z) - Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [85.92660644100582]
We explore machine unlearning in the domain of large language models (LLMs)
This initiative aims to eliminate undesirable data influence (e.g., sensitive or illegal information) and the associated model capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T20:51:58Z) - Solution-oriented Agent-based Models Generation with Verifier-assisted
Iterative In-context Learning [10.67134969207797]
Agent-based models (ABMs) stand as an essential paradigm for proposing and validating hypothetical solutions or policies.
Large language models (LLMs) encapsulating cross-domain knowledge and programming proficiency could potentially alleviate the difficulty of this process.
We present SAGE, a general solution-oriented ABM generation framework designed for automatic modeling and generating solutions for targeted problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-04T07:59:06Z) - Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A
Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text.
Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.