Analyzing Different Expert-Opined Strategies to Enhance the Effect on the Goal of a Multi-Attribute Decision-Making System Using a Concept of Effort Propagation and Application in Enhancement of High School Students' Performance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02254v1
• Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 12:53:40 GMT
• Title: Analyzing Different Expert-Opined Strategies to Enhance the Effect on the Goal of a Multi-Attribute Decision-Making System Using a Concept of Effort Propagation and Application in Enhancement of High School Students' Performance
• Authors: Suvojit Dhara and Adrijit Goswami
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes two such strategies, namely parallel and hierarchical effort assignment, and propagation strategies. The strategies are analyzed for a real-life case study regarding Indian high school administrative factors that play an important role in enhancing students' performance.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In many real-world multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problems, mining the inter-relationships and possible hierarchical structures among the factors are considered to be one of the primary tasks. But, besides that, one major task is to determine an optimal strategy to work on the factors to enhance the effect on the goal attribute. This paper proposes two such strategies, namely parallel and hierarchical effort assignment, and propagation strategies. The concept of effort propagation through a strategy is formally defined and described in the paper. Both the parallel and hierarchical strategies are divided into sub-strategies based on whether the assignment of efforts to the factors is uniform or depends upon some appropriate heuristics related to the factors in the system. The adapted and discussed heuristics are the relative significance and effort propagability of the factors. The strategies are analyzed for a real-life case study regarding Indian high school administrative factors that play an important role in enhancing students' performance. Total effort propagation of around 7%-15% to the goal is seen across the proposed strategies given a total of 1 unit of effort to the directly accessible factors of the system. A comparative analysis is adapted to determine the optimal strategy among the proposed ones to enhance student performance most effectively. The highest effort propagation achieved in the work is approximately 14.4348%. The analysis in the paper establishes the necessity of research towards the direction of effort propagation analysis in case of decision-making problems.

Related papers

• Meta Reasoning for Large Language Models [58.87183757029041]
  We introduce Meta-Reasoning Prompting (MRP), a novel and efficient system prompting method for large language models (LLMs) MRP guides LLMs to dynamically select and apply different reasoning methods based on the specific requirements of each task. We evaluate the effectiveness of MRP through comprehensive benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T16:14:11Z)
• Reduced-Rank Multi-objective Policy Learning and Optimization [57.978477569678844]
  In practice, causal researchers do not have a single outcome in mind a priori. In government-assisted social benefit programs, policymakers collect many outcomes to understand the multidimensional nature of poverty. We present a data-driven dimensionality-reduction methodology for multiple outcomes in the context of optimal policy learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T08:16:30Z)
• LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.89014602596673]
  Strategic reasoning requires understanding and predicting adversary actions in multi-agent settings while adjusting strategies accordingly. We explore the scopes, applications, methodologies, and evaluation metrics related to strategic reasoning with Large Language Models. It underscores the importance of strategic reasoning as a critical cognitive capability and offers insights into future research directions and potential improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z)
• K-Level Reasoning: Establishing Higher Order Beliefs in Large Language Models for Strategic Reasoning [76.3114831562989]
  It requires Large Language Model (LLM) agents to adapt their strategies dynamically in multi-agent environments. We propose a novel framework: "K-Level Reasoning with Large Language Models (K-R)"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T16:07:05Z)
• Quantifying Agent Interaction in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Cost-efficient Generalization [63.554226552130054]
  Generalization poses a significant challenge in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) The extent to which an agent is influenced by unseen co-players depends on the agent's policy and the specific scenario. We present the Level of Influence (LoI), a metric quantifying the interaction intensity among agents within a given scenario and environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T06:09:26Z)
• Risk-reducing design and operations toolkit: 90 strategies for managing risk and uncertainty in decision problems [65.268245109828]
  This paper develops a catalog of such strategies and develops a framework for them. It argues that they provide an efficient response to decision problems that are seemingly intractable due to high uncertainty. It then proposes a framework to incorporate them into decision theory using multi-objective optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T16:14:32Z)
• Enhance Multi-domain Sentiment Analysis of Review Texts through Prompting Strategies [1.335032286337391]
  We formulate the process of prompting for sentiment analysis tasks and introduce two novel strategies tailored for sentiment analysis. We conduct comparative experiments on three distinct domain datasets to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed sentiment analysis strategies. The results demonstrate that the adoption of the proposed prompting strategies leads to a increasing enhancement in sentiment analysis accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T08:44:23Z)
• Iterative Hierarchy and Ranking Process (IHRP): A Novel Effective Hierarchy Method for Densely Connected Systems and Case Study in Student Performance Assessment [1.6317061277457001]
  Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) is a widely used hierarchy-building method that mines factor inter-influences based on expert opinions. This paper discusses one of the main drawbacks of the conventional ISM method in systems where the factors are densely interrelated. We propose a novel iterative hierarchy-building technique, called 'Iterative Hierarchy and Ranking Process'(IHRP) which performs effectively in such dense systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-17T19:11:34Z)
• Matching a Desired Causal State via Shift Interventions [13.89612747723388]
  We consider the problem of identifying a shift intervention that matches the desired mean of a system through active learning. We propose two active learning strategies that are guaranteed to exactly match a desired mean. We show that our strategies may require exponentially fewer interventions than the previously considered approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T08:11:36Z)
• Uncertainty quantification and exploration-exploitation trade-off in humans [0.0]
  The main objective of this paper is to outline a theoretical framework to analyse how humans' decision-making strategies under uncertainty manage the trade-off between information gathering (exploration) and reward seeking (exploitation)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T16:03:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.