Algorithmic Collusion or Competition: the Role of Platforms' Recommender Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14548v2
• Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 08:36:19 GMT
• Title: Algorithmic Collusion or Competition: the Role of Platforms' Recommender Systems
• Authors: Xingchen Xu, Stephanie Lee, Yong Tan,
• Abstract summary: Online platforms commonly deploy recommender systems that influence how consumers discover and purchase products. We propose a novel repeated game framework that integrates several key components. We show that a revenue-maximizing recommender system intensifies algorithmic collusion, whereas a utility-maximizing recommender system encourages more competitive pricing behavior among sellers.
• Score: 2.2706058775017217
• License:
• Abstract: Recent scholarly work has extensively examined the phenomenon of algorithmic collusion driven by AI-enabled pricing algorithms. However, online platforms commonly deploy recommender systems that influence how consumers discover and purchase products, thereby shaping the reward structures faced by pricing algorithms and ultimately affecting competition dynamics and equilibrium outcomes. To address this gap in the literature and elucidate the role of recommender systems, we propose a novel repeated game framework that integrates several key components. We first develop a structural search model to characterize consumers' decision-making processes in response to varying recommendation sets. This model incorporates both observable and unobservable heterogeneity in utility and search cost functions, and is estimated using real-world data. Building on the resulting consumer model, we formulate personalized recommendation algorithms designed to maximize either platform revenue or consumer utility. We further introduce pricing algorithms for sellers and integrate all these elements to facilitate comprehensive numerical experiments. Our experimental findings reveal that a revenue-maximizing recommender system intensifies algorithmic collusion, whereas a utility-maximizing recommender system encourages more competitive pricing behavior among sellers. Intriguingly, and contrary to conventional insights from the industrial organization and choice modeling literature, increasing the size of recommendation sets under a utility-maximizing regime does not consistently enhance consumer utility. Moreover, the degree of horizontal differentiation moderates this phenomenon in unexpected ways. The "more is less" effect does not arise at low levels of differentiation, but becomes increasingly pronounced as horizontal differentiation increases.

Related papers

• Procurement Auctions via Approximately Optimal Submodular Optimization [53.93943270902349]
  We study procurement auctions, where an auctioneer seeks to acquire services from strategic sellers with private costs. Our goal is to design computationally efficient auctions that maximize the difference between the quality of the acquired services and the total cost of the sellers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T18:06:55Z)
• Learning Recommender Systems with Soft Target: A Decoupled Perspective [49.83787742587449]
  We propose a novel decoupled soft label optimization framework to consider the objectives as two aspects by leveraging soft labels. We present a sensible soft-label generation algorithm that models a label propagation algorithm to explore users' latent interests in unobserved feedback via neighbors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T04:20:15Z)
• By Fair Means or Foul: Quantifying Collusion in a Market Simulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning [1.5249435285717095]
  This research employs an experimental oligopoly model of repeated price competition. We investigate the strategies and emerging pricing patterns developed by the agents, which may lead to a collusive outcome. Our findings indicate that RL-based AI agents converge to a collusive state characterized by the charging of supracompetitive prices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T15:35:08Z)
• A Personalized Framework for Consumer and Producer Group Fairness Optimization in Recommender Systems [13.89038866451741]
  We propose CP-FairRank, an optimization-based re-ranking algorithm that seamlessly integrates fairness constraints from both the consumer and producer side. We demonstrate that our proposed strategy is able to improve both consumer and producer fairness without compromising overall recommendation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T10:42:05Z)
• Refined Mechanism Design for Approximately Structured Priors via Active Regression [50.71772232237571]
  We consider the problem of a revenue-maximizing seller with a large number of items for sale to $n$ strategic bidders. It is well-known that optimal and even approximately-optimal mechanisms for this setting are notoriously difficult to characterize or compute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T20:34:17Z)
• Modeling Recommender Ecosystems: Research Challenges at the Intersection of Mechanism Design, Reinforcement Learning and Generative Models [17.546954143602818]
  We argue that modeling the incentives and behaviors of all actors in the system is strictly necessary to maximize the value the system brings to these actors and improve overall ecosystem "health" We propose a conceptual framework that encompasses these elements, and articulate a number of research challenges that emerge at the intersection of these different disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T03:20:58Z)
• Model-based Causal Bayesian Optimization [74.78486244786083]
  We introduce the first algorithm for Causal Bayesian Optimization with Multiplicative Weights (CBO-MW) We derive regret bounds for CBO-MW that naturally depend on graph-related quantities. Our experiments include a realistic demonstration of how CBO-MW can be used to learn users' demand patterns in a shared mobility system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T13:02:36Z)
• Structured Dynamic Pricing: Optimal Regret in a Global Shrinkage Model [50.06663781566795]
  We consider a dynamic model with the consumers' preferences as well as price sensitivity varying over time. We measure the performance of a dynamic pricing policy via regret, which is the expected revenue loss compared to a clairvoyant that knows the sequence of model parameters in advance. Our regret analysis results not only demonstrate optimality of the proposed policy but also show that for policy planning it is essential to incorporate available structural information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T00:23:23Z)
• Incentive-Aware Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Markets [49.692453629365204]
  We propose a novel recommender system that aligns with agents' incentives while achieving myopically optimal performance. Our framework models this incentive-aware system as a multi-agent bandit problem in two-sided markets. Both algorithms satisfy an ex-post fairness criterion, which protects agents from over-exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T22:20:12Z)
• CPFair: Personalized Consumer and Producer Fairness Re-ranking for Recommender Systems [5.145741425164946]
  We present an optimization-based re-ranking approach that seamlessly integrates fairness constraints from both the consumer and producer-side. We demonstrate through large-scale experiments on 8 datasets that our proposed method is capable of improving both consumer and producer fairness without reducing overall recommendation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T20:38:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.