Targeting relative risk heterogeneity with causal forests

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.15793v3
• Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2025 17:10:35 GMT
• Title: Targeting relative risk heterogeneity with causal forests
• Abstract summary: We propose and implement a methodology for modifying causal forests to target relative risk.<n>We present results from simulated data that suggest relative risk causal forests can capture otherwise undetected sources of heterogeneity.<n>We implement our method on real-world trial data to explore HTEs for liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes.
• Score: 1.2255617580795168
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The identification of heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) across subgroups is of significant interest in clinical trial analysis. Several state-of-the-art HTE estimation methods, including causal forests, apply recursive partitioning for non-parametric identification of relevant covariates and interactions. However, the partitioning criterion is typically based on differences in absolute risk. This can dilute statistical power by masking variation in the relative risk, which is often a more appropriate quantity of clinical interest. In this work, we propose and implement a methodology for modifying causal forests to target relative risk, using a novel node-splitting procedure based on exhaustive generalized linear model comparison. We present results from simulated data that suggest relative risk causal forests can capture otherwise undetected sources of heterogeneity. We implement our method on real-world trial data to explore HTEs for liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Related papers

• A Guide to Estimating Conditional Average Treatment Effects in Competing Risks Settings [1.7900262205172117]
  Conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) are central to treatment decision-making in personalized medicine.<n>In competing risks settings, estimating CATEs from survival data allows for patient-specific assessments of treatment effectiveness.<n>We study meta-learners which adapt machine learning algorithms for CATE estimation in competing risks scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T15:58:08Z)
• Robust inference for risk heterogeneity under group imbalance [8.713612612607408]
  In intensive care unit studies, mortality risk associated with specific admission diagnoses can vary across ethnic groups.<n>Existing approaches for detecting risk heterogeneity are often sensitive to baseline model misspecification and regularization bias.<n>We propose a robust framework for inferring risk heterogeneity between two populations using Neymanity estimators that are locally insensitive to nuisance parameter estimation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-30T16:35:45Z)
• Detecting Batch Heterogeneity via Likelihood Clustering [0.9668407688201359]
  Batch effects represent a major confounder in genomic diagnostics.<n>We introduce a method that addresses both limitations by clustering samples according to their Bayesian model evidence.<n>Our method achieves superior clustering accuracy compared to standard correlation-based and dimensionality-reduction approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T01:49:21Z)
• Debiased maximum-likelihood estimators for hazard ratios under machine-learning adjustment [0.0]
  We propose abandoning the baseline hazard and using machine learning to explicitly model the change in the risk set with or without latent variables.<n> Numerical simulations confirm that the proposed method identifies the ground truth with minimal bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T16:51:09Z)
• A Bayesian Classification Trees Approach to Treatment Effect Variation with Noncompliance [0.5356944479760104]
  Estimating varying treatment effects in randomized trials with noncompliance is inherently challenging. Existing flexible machine learning methods are highly sensitive to the weak instruments problem. We present a Bayesian Causal Forest model for binary response variables in scenarios with noncompliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T18:33:55Z)
• Data-Adaptive Tradeoffs among Multiple Risks in Distribution-Free Prediction [55.77015419028725]
  We develop methods that permit valid control of risk when threshold and tradeoff parameters are chosen adaptively. Our methodology supports monotone and nearly-monotone risks, but otherwise makes no distributional assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T17:28:06Z)
• Pain level and pain-related behaviour classification using GRU-based sparsely-connected RNNs [61.080598804629375]
  People with chronic pain unconsciously adapt specific body movements to protect themselves from injury or additional pain. Because there is no dedicated benchmark database to analyse this correlation, we considered one of the specific circumstances that potentially influence a person's biometrics during daily activities. We proposed a sparsely-connected recurrent neural networks (s-RNNs) ensemble with the gated recurrent unit (GRU) that incorporates multiple autoencoders. We conducted several experiments which indicate that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches in classifying both pain level and pain-related behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T12:56:28Z)
• Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation for Observational Data using Model-based Forests [0.0]
  We propose modifications to model-based forests to address the confounding issue in observational data. We found that this strategy reduces confounding effects in a simulated study with various outcome distributions. We demonstrate the practical aspects of HTE estimation for survival and ordinal outcomes by an assessment of the potentially heterogeneous effect of Riluzole on the progress of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T11:49:39Z)
• What Makes Forest-Based Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimators Work? [1.1050303097572156]
  We show that both methods can be understood in terms of the same parameters and confounding assumptions under L2 loss. In the randomized setting, both approaches performed akin to the new blended versions in a benchmark study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T12:45:07Z)
• Mitigating multiple descents: A model-agnostic framework for risk monotonization [84.6382406922369]
  We develop a general framework for risk monotonization based on cross-validation. We propose two data-driven methodologies, namely zero- and one-step, that are akin to bagging and boosting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T17:41:40Z)
• Risk Consistent Multi-Class Learning from Label Proportions [64.0125322353281]
  This study addresses a multiclass learning from label proportions (MCLLP) setting in which training instances are provided in bags. Most existing MCLLP methods impose bag-wise constraints on the prediction of instances or assign them pseudo-labels. A risk-consistent method is proposed for instance classification using the empirical risk minimization framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-24T03:49:04Z)
• Self-Certifying Classification by Linearized Deep Assignment [65.0100925582087]
  We propose a novel class of deep predictors for classifying metric data on graphs within PAC-Bayes risk certification paradigm. Building on the recent PAC-Bayes literature and data-dependent priors, this approach enables learning posterior distributions on the hypothesis space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T19:59:14Z)
• Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference [58.442274475425144]
  Since the average treatment effect measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population. In this paper we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution. Some bounds can also be interpreted as summarizing a complex CATE function into a single metric and are of interest independently of being a bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T17:21:26Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Conditional canonical correlation estimation based on covariates with random forests [0.0]
  We propose a new method called Random Forest with Canonical Correlation Analysis (RFCCA) to estimate the conditional canonical correlations between two sets of variables. The proposed method and the global significance test is evaluated through simulation studies that show it provides accurate canonical correlation estimations and well-controlled Type-1 error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-23T17:09:46Z)
• Robust Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Uncertainty Quantification [84.53697297858146]
  Subgroup analysis of treatment effects plays an important role in applications from medicine to public policy to recommender systems. Most of the current methods of subgroup analysis begin with a particular algorithm for estimating individualized treatment effects (ITE) This paper develops a new method for subgroup analysis, R2P, that addresses all these weaknesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T14:50:02Z)
• Pursuing Sources of Heterogeneity in Modeling Clustered Population [16.936362485508774]
  We propose a regularized finite mixture effects regression to achieve heterogeneous pursuit and feature selection simultaneously. A constrained sparse estimation of these effects leads to the identification of both the variables with common effects and those with heterogeneous effects. Three applications are presented, namely, an imaging genetics study for linking genetic factors and brain traits in Alzheimer's disease, a public health study for exploring the association between suicide risk among adolescents and their school district characteristics, and a sport analytics study for understanding how the salary levels of baseball players are associated with their performance and contractual status.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-10T14:59:35Z)
• Survival Cluster Analysis [93.50540270973927]
  There is an unmet need in survival analysis for identifying subpopulations with distinct risk profiles. An approach that addresses this need is likely to improve characterization of individual outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-29T22:41:21Z)
• Efficient Discovery of Heterogeneous Quantile Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments via Anomalous Pattern Detection [1.9346186297861747]
  Treatment Effect Subset Scan (TESS) is a new method for discovering which subpopulation in a randomized experiment is most significantly affected by a treatment. In addition to the algorithm, we demonstrate that under the sharp null hypothesis of no treatment effect, the Type I and II error can be controlled.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2018-03-24T20:21:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.