The physics and metaphysics of the conceptuality interpretation of quantum mechanics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10684v1
• Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 10:00:49 GMT
• Title: The physics and metaphysics of the conceptuality interpretation of quantum mechanics
• Authors: Diederik Aerts and Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi
• Abstract summary: It has been argued that the difficulty in understanding quantum theory is our failed attempt to force onto it a wrong conceptual scheme. Many thinkers have suggested that we must surrender to the fact that our physical world is one of immanent powers and potencies. However, if on the one hand a potentiality puts the accent on the processes of change, responsible for the incessant shifts between actual and potential properties, on the other hand it does not tell what these changes are all about.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Quantum mechanics has maintained over the years the reputation of being "the most obscure theory." It works perfectly well, but nobody seems to know why. It has been argued that the difficulty in understanding quantum theory is our failed attempt to force onto it a wrong conceptual scheme, wanting at all costs to think about the objects of the theory as, precisely, objects, i.e., entities having continuously actual spatiotemporal properties. This too restrictive spatiotemporal scheme is most probably at the heart of the problem, as also underlined by the Einsteinian revolution, but then what could be an alternative? Many thinkers have suggested that we must surrender to the fact that our physical world is one of immanent powers and potencies. Aristotle did so ante quantum litteram, followed by scholars like Heisenberg, Primas, Shimony, Piron, Kastner, Kauffman, de Ronde, just to name a few, including the authors, who were both students of Piron in Geneva. However, if on the one hand a potentiality ontology puts the accent on the processes of change, responsible for the incessant shifts between actual and potential properties, on the other hand it does not tell what these changes are all about. In other words, the metaphysical question remains of identifying the nature of the bearer of these potencies, or potentialities, and of the entities that can actualize them. It is the purpose of the present article to emphasize that the above question has found a possible answer in the recent Conceptuality Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, which we believe offers the missing ontology and metaphysics that can make the theory fully intelligible, and even intuitive.

Related papers

• Causality and a possible interpretation of quantum mechanics [2.7398542529968477]
  Based on quantum field theory, our work provides a framework that harmoniously integrates relativistic causality, quantum non-locality, and quantum measurement. We use reduced density matrices to represent the local information of the quantum state and show that the reduced density matrices cannot evolve superluminally. Unlike recent approaches that focus on causality by introducing new operators to describe detectors, we consider that everything--including detectors, environments, and humans--is composed of the same fundamental fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T07:07:22Z)
• Understanding and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics [0.65268245109828]
  De Regt's contextual theory of understanding argues that recognizing qualitatively characteristic consequences of a theory T without performing exact calculations is a criterion for scientific understanding. If the task of understanding quantum mechanics has been finished already, there would be a conflict between the contextual theory of understanding of quantum mechanics and interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T10:59:30Z)
• Perspectival Quantum Realism [0.0]
  We argue that the problems identified by QBism and Quantum Pragmatism do not necessitate abandoning the ideal of representing the physical world. We can avail ourselves of the same puzzle-solving strategies as employed by QBists and pragmatists by adopting a emphperspectival quantum realism
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T16:23:54Z)
• Quantum Field Theories, Topological Materials, and Topological Quantum Computing [3.553493344868414]
  A quantum computer can perform exponentially faster than its classical counterpart. Topology and knot theory, geometric phases, topological materials, topological quantum field theories, recoupling theory, and category theory are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-20T15:12:44Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Testing quantum theory with thought experiments [4.847980206213335]
  How should one model systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory? We give a state-of-the-art overview on quantum thought experiments involving observers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T18:08:23Z)
• Demystifying Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
  We discuss the concepts of physical reality imposed by quantum mechanics, the role of the observer, prediction limits, a definition of collapse, and how to deal with correlated states. The discussion is carried out within the framework of accepting that there is in fact nothing important missing, rather we are just restricted by the limitations imposed by quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T22:32:11Z)
• Quantization of Reality, another Epistemological Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics? [0.0]
  The interpretation of quantum mechanics is still in an unacceptable status. For the sake of human curiosity and to get a better understanding of the universe we are living in, this attitude should be changed. A possibly interesting new approach is outlined in this article, which may help adjust the focus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-07T15:41:26Z)
• Are quantum cryptographic security claims vacuous? [12.970250708769708]
  We explain why Bernstein's reasoning is based on a too "classical" understanding of physics. It follows from known theorems about fault-tolerant quantum computation that quantum physics avoids his conclusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T18:00:05Z)
• Understanding Quantum Mechanics (Beyond Metaphysical Dogmatism and Naive Empiricism) [0.0]
  We will argue that the reason behind the impossibility to reach a meaningful answer to this question is strictly related to the 20th Century Bohrian-positivist re-foundation of physics. We will also argue that the possibility of understanding QM is at plain sight, given we return to the original framework of physics in which the meaning of understanding has always been clear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T14:40:44Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.