Understanding Retrieval Augmentation for Long-Form Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12150v2
• Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2025 18:29:29 GMT
• Title: Understanding Retrieval Augmentation for Long-Form Question Answering
• Authors: Hung-Ting Chen, Fangyuan Xu, Shane Arora, Eunsol Choi,
• Abstract summary: We study how retrieved documents are used in language models (LMs) for long-form generation task.<n>We find that while LMs can leverage relevant in-context documents, the generated answer is only partially attributable towards the documents.
• Score: 38.91211621118847
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: How retrieved documents are used in language models (LMs) for long-form generation task is understudied. We present two controlled studies on retrieval-augmented LM for long-form question answering (LFQA): one fixing the LM and varying evidence documents and the other fixing evidence documents and varying the LMs. We study various attributes of generated answers (e.g., fluency, length, variance), with an emphasis on the attribution of generated answers to in-context evidence documents. We collect a dataset (SALAD) containing human annotations of sentence-level answer attribution in LFQA and evaluate existing methods for automatically judging attribution. We find that while LMs can leverage relevant in-context documents, the generated answer is only partially attributable towards the documents, especially for LMs trained without retrieval augmentation. Together, our analysis reveals how retrieval augmentation impacts long knowledge-rich text generation and provide directions for future work.

Related papers

• ReAG: Reasoning-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering [54.72902502486611]
  ReAG is a Reasoning-Augmented Multimodal RAG approach that combines coarse- and fine-grained retrieval with a critic model that filters irrelevant passages.<n>ReAG significantly outperforms prior methods, improving answer accuracy and providing interpretable reasoning grounded in retrieved evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T19:01:02Z)
• GE-Chat: A Graph Enhanced RAG Framework for Evidential Response Generation of LLMs [6.3596531375179515]
  This paper proposes GE-Chat, a knowledge Graph enhanced retrieval-augmented generation framework to provide evidence-based response generation.<n> Specifically, when the user uploads a material document, a knowledge graph will be created, which helps construct a retrieval-augmented agent.<n>We leverage Chain-of-Thought (CoT) logic generation, n-hop sub-graph searching, and entailment-based sentence generation to realize accurate evidence retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T10:17:35Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Visual Question Answering via Built-in Autoregressive Search Engines [17.803396998387665]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged to address the knowledge-intensive visual question answering (VQA) task. We propose ReAuSE, an alternative to the previous RAG model for the knowledge-based VQA task. Our model functions both as a generative retriever and an accurate answer generator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T16:39:39Z)
• Pointwise Mutual Information as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
  We show that the pointwise mutual information between a context and a question is an effective gauge for language model performance. We propose two methods that use the pointwise mutual information between a document and a question as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z)
• Enhancing Answer Attribution for Faithful Text Generation with Large Language Models [5.065947993017158]
  We propose new methods for producing more independent and contextualized claims for better retrieval and attribution. New methods are evaluated and shown to improve the performance of answer attribution components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T15:37:46Z)
• ELOQ: Resources for Enhancing LLM Detection of Out-of-Scope Questions [52.33835101586687]
  We study out-of-scope questions, where the retrieved document appears semantically similar to the question but lacks the necessary information to answer it.<n>We propose a guided hallucination-based approach ELOQ to automatically generate a diverse set of out-of-scope questions from post-cutoff documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T16:11:29Z)
• Enhancing Post-Hoc Attributions in Long Document Comprehension via Coarse Grained Answer Decomposition [10.585679421637948]
  Post-hoc attribution systems are designed to map answer text back to the source document, yet the granularity of this mapping has not been addressed. We propose and investigate a novel approach to the factual decomposition of generated answers for attribution, employing template-based in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T16:32:35Z)
• Analysis of Plan-based Retrieval for Grounded Text Generation [78.89478272104739]
  hallucinations occur when a language model is given a generation task outside its parametric knowledge. A common strategy to address this limitation is to infuse the language models with retrieval mechanisms. We analyze how planning can be used to guide retrieval to further reduce the frequency of hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T02:19:35Z)
• Attribute or Abstain: Large Language Models as Long Document Assistants [58.32043134560244]
  LLMs can help humans working with long documents, but are known to hallucinate. Existing approaches to attribution have only been evaluated in RAG settings, where the initial retrieval confounds LLM performance. This is crucially different from the long document setting, where retrieval is not needed, but could help. We present LAB, a benchmark of 6 diverse long document tasks with attribution, and experiments with different approaches to attribution on 5 LLMs of different sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T16:16:02Z)
• Context-augmented Retrieval: A Novel Framework for Fast Information Retrieval based Response Generation using Large Language Model [0.0]
  As the corpus of contextual information grows, the answer/inference quality of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based Question Answering (QA) systems declines. This work solves this problem by combining classical text classification with the Large Language Model (LLM) New approach Context Augmented retrieval (CAR) demonstrates good quality answer generation along with significant reduction in information retrieval and answer generation time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T07:52:05Z)
• Peering into the Mind of Language Models: An Approach for Attribution in Contextual Question Answering [9.86691461253151]
  We introduce a novel method for attribution in contextual question answering, leveraging the hidden state representations of large language models (LLMs) Our approach bypasses the need for extensive model retraining and retrieval model overhead, offering granular attributions and preserving the quality of generated answers. We present Verifiability-granular, an attribution dataset which has token level annotations for LLM generations in the contextual question answering setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T09:12:44Z)
• R4: Reinforced Retriever-Reorder-Responder for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [32.598670876662375]
  Retrieval-augmented large language models (LLMs) leverage relevant content retrieved by information retrieval systems to generate correct responses. Existing retriever-responder methods typically append relevant documents to the prompt of LLMs to perform text generation tasks. We propose a new pipeline named "Reinforced Retriever-Reorder-Responder" to learn document orderings for retrieval-augmented LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T12:59:10Z)
• Groundedness in Retrieval-augmented Long-form Generation: An Empirical Study [61.74571814707054]
  We evaluate whether every generated sentence is grounded in retrieved documents or the model's pre-training data. Across 3 datasets and 4 model families, our findings reveal that a significant fraction of generated sentences are consistently ungrounded. Our results show that while larger models tend to ground their outputs more effectively, a significant portion of correct answers remains compromised by hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T14:50:10Z)
• Reliable, Adaptable, and Attributable Language Models with Retrieval [144.26890121729514]
  Parametric language models (LMs) are trained on vast amounts of web data. They face practical challenges such as hallucinations, difficulty in adapting to new data distributions, and a lack of verifiability. We advocate for retrieval-augmented LMs to replace parametric LMs as the next generation of LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T18:22:33Z)
• Where is the answer? Investigating Positional Bias in Language Model Knowledge Extraction [36.40833517478628]
  Large language models require updates to remain up-to-date or adapt to new domains.<n>One key is memorizing the latest information in a way that the memorized information is extractable with a query prompt.<n>Despite minimizing document perplexity during fine-tuning, LLMs struggle to extract information through a prompt sentence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T06:29:16Z)
• Context Matters: Pushing the Boundaries of Open-Ended Answer Generation with Graph-Structured Knowledge Context [4.1229332722825]
  This paper introduces a novel framework that combines graph-driven context retrieval in conjunction to knowledge graphs based enhancement. We conduct experiments on various Large Language Models (LLMs) with different parameter sizes to evaluate their ability to ground knowledge and determine factual accuracy in answers to open-ended questions. Our methodology GraphContextGen consistently outperforms dominant text-based retrieval systems, demonstrating its robustness and adaptability to a larger number of use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T11:25:34Z)
• DIVKNOWQA: Assessing the Reasoning Ability of LLMs via Open-Domain Question Answering over Knowledge Base and Text [73.68051228972024]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive generation capabilities, but they suffer from hallucinations when relying on their internal knowledge. Retrieval-augmented LLMs have emerged as a potential solution to ground LLMs in external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T04:37:57Z)
• Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection [74.51523859064802]
  We introduce a new framework called Self-Reflective Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Self-RAG) Self-RAG enhances an LM's quality and factuality through retrieval and self-reflection. It significantly outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs and retrieval-augmented models on a diverse set of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T18:18:32Z)
• New Methods & Metrics for LFQA tasks [0.0]
  Long-form question answering tasks require retrieving the documents pertinent to a query, using them to form a paragraph-length answer. This work addresses the train/validation/test dataset overlap, absence of automatic metrics and generated answers not being "grounded" in retrieved documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-26T18:38:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.