Deceptive Semantic Shortcuts on Reasoning Chains: How Far Can Models Go without Hallucination?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09702v3
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:08:51 GMT
- Title: Deceptive Semantic Shortcuts on Reasoning Chains: How Far Can Models Go without Hallucination?
- Authors: Bangzheng Li, Ben Zhou, Fei Wang, Xingyu Fu, Dan Roth, Muhao Chen,
- Abstract summary: This work studies a specific type of hallucination induced by semantic associations.
To quantify this phenomenon, we propose a novel probing method and benchmark called EureQA.
- Score: 73.454943870226
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Despite the recent advancement in large language models (LLMs) and their high performances across numerous benchmarks, recent research has unveiled that LLMs suffer from hallucinations and unfaithful reasoning. This work studies a specific type of hallucination induced by semantic associations. Specifically, we investigate to what extent LLMs take shortcuts from certain keyword/entity biases in the prompt instead of following the correct reasoning path. To quantify this phenomenon, we propose a novel probing method and benchmark called EureQA. We start from questions that LLMs will answer correctly with utmost certainty, and mask the important entity with evidence sentence recursively, asking models to find masked entities according to a chain of evidence before answering the question. During the construction of the evidence, we purposefully replace semantic clues (entities) that may lead to the correct answer with distractor clues (evidence) that will not directly lead to the correct answer but require a chain-like reasoning process. We evaluate if models can follow the correct reasoning chain instead of short-cutting through distractor clues. We find that existing LLMs lack the necessary capabilities to follow correct reasoning paths and resist the attempt of greedy shortcuts. We show that the distractor semantic associations often lead to model hallucination, which is strong evidence that questions the validity of current LLM reasoning.
Related papers
- Logical Closed Loop: Uncovering Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models [52.957842999317506]
Object hallucination refers to the phenomenon that the LVLMs claim non-existent objects in the image.
We propose a Logical Closed Loop-based framework for Object Hallucination Detection and Mitigation, namely LogicCheckGPT.
As a plug-and-play method, it can be seamlessly applied to all existing LVLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T15:28:39Z) - Direct Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought in Multi-hop Reasoning with Knowledge Graphs [52.42505579545893]
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning abilities when prompted to generate chain-of-thought explanations alongside answers.
We propose a novel discriminative and generative CoT evaluation paradigm to assess LLMs' knowledge of reasoning and the accuracy of the generated CoT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-17T05:22:56Z) - The ART of LLM Refinement: Ask, Refine, and Trust [85.75059530612882]
We propose a reasoning with refinement objective called ART: Ask, Refine, and Trust.
It asks necessary questions to decide when an LLM should refine its output.
It achieves a performance gain of +5 points over self-refinement baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T07:26:32Z) - A Closer Look at the Self-Verification Abilities of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoning [73.77088902676306]
We take a closer look at the self-verification abilities of large language models (LLMs) in the context of logical reasoning.
Our main findings suggest that existing LLMs could struggle to identify fallacious reasoning steps accurately and may fall short of guaranteeing the validity of self-verification methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T07:13:10Z) - Concise and Organized Perception Facilitates Reasoning in Large Language Models [32.71672086718057]
We show that large language models (LLMs) exhibit failure patterns akin to human-like cognitive biases when dealing with disordered and irrelevant content in reasoning tasks.
We propose a novel reasoning approach named Concise and Organized Perception (COP)
COP carefully analyzes the given statements to identify the most pertinent information while eliminating redundancy efficiently.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T04:47:49Z) - Boosting Language Models Reasoning with Chain-of-Knowledge Prompting [18.326858925174605]
Chain-of-Knowledge (CoK) prompting aims at eliciting explicit pieces of knowledge evidence in the form of structure triple.
Benefiting from CoK, we additionally introduce a F2-Verification method to estimate the reliability of the reasoning chains.
Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method can further improve the performance of commonsense, factual, symbolic, and arithmetic reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-10T12:42:36Z) - Large Language Models are In-Context Semantic Reasoners rather than
Symbolic Reasoners [75.85554779782048]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have excited the natural language and machine learning community over recent years.
Despite of numerous successful applications, the underlying mechanism of such in-context capabilities still remains unclear.
In this work, we hypothesize that the learned textitsemantics of language tokens do the most heavy lifting during the reasoning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T07:33:34Z) - Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via
Debate [19.887103433032774]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance in complex reasoning tasks.
This work explores testing LLMs' reasoning by engaging with them in a debate-like conversation.
We find that despite their impressive performance, LLMs like ChatGPT cannot maintain their beliefs in truth for a significant portion of examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T15:47:31Z) - Faithful Reasoning Using Large Language Models [12.132449274592668]
We show how LMs can be made to perform faithful multi-step reasoning via a process whose causal structure mirrors the underlying logical structure of the problem.
Our approach works by chaining together reasoning steps, where each step results from calls to two fine-tuned LMs.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our model on multi-step logical deduction and scientific question-answering, showing that it outperforms baselines on final answer accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-30T13:44:41Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.