AutoPlanBench: Automatically generating benchmarks for LLM planners from PDDL

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09830v2
• Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 09:48:41 GMT
• Title: AutoPlanBench: Automatically generating benchmarks for LLM planners from PDDL
• Authors: Katharina Stein, Daniel Fi\v{s}er, J\"org Hoffmann and Alexander Koller
• Abstract summary: We present AutoPlanBench, a novel method for automatically converting planning benchmarks written in PDDL into textual descriptions. We show that while the best LLM planners do well on some planning tasks, others remain out of reach of current methods.
• Score: 52.005042190810116
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: LLMs are being increasingly used for planning-style tasks, but their capabilities for planning and reasoning are poorly understood. We present AutoPlanBench, a novel method for automatically converting planning benchmarks written in PDDL into textual descriptions and offer a benchmark dataset created with our method. We show that while the best LLM planners do well on some planning tasks, others remain out of reach of current methods.

Related papers

• AutoPDL: Automatic Prompt Optimization for LLM Agents [1.715270928578365]
  This paper proposes AutoPDL, an automated approach to discover good prompting agent configurations. We introduce a library implementing the PDL prompt programming language. We show consistent accuracy gains ($9.5pm17.5$ percentage points), up to 68.9pp, and reveal that selected prompting strategies vary across models and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-06T05:30:10Z)
• LLM-AutoDiff: Auto-Differentiate Any LLM Workflow [58.56731133392544]
  We introduce LLM-AutoDiff: a novel framework for Automatic Prompt Engineering (APE) LLMs-AutoDiff treats each textual input as a trainable parameter and uses a frozen backward engine to generate feedback-akin to textual gradients. It consistently outperforms existing textual gradient baselines in both accuracy and training cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T03:18:48Z)
• Leveraging Environment Interaction for Automated PDDL Translation and Planning with Large Language Models [7.3238629831871735]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various natural language tasks. Planning problems into the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) has been proposed as a potential solution. We propose a novel approach that leverages LLMs and environment feedback to automatically generate PDDL domain and problem description files.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T19:50:51Z)
• Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks. LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning. We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z)
• Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models [57.23454975238014]
  This work lays the foundations for improving planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We construct a comprehensive benchmark suite encompassing both classical planning benchmarks and natural language scenarios. We investigate the use of many-shot in-context learning to enhance LLM planning, exploring the relationship between increased context length and improved planning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T22:57:06Z)
• NATURAL PLAN: Benchmarking LLMs on Natural Language Planning [109.73382347588417]
  We introduce NATURAL PLAN, a realistic planning benchmark in natural language containing 3 key tasks: Trip Planning, Meeting Planning, and Calendar Scheduling. We focus our evaluation on the planning capabilities of LLMs with full information on the task, by providing outputs from tools such as Google Flights, Google Maps, and Google Calendar as contexts to the models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T21:27:35Z)
• NL2Plan: Robust LLM-Driven Planning from Minimal Text Descriptions [8.004470925893957]
  We present NL2Plan, the first domain-agnostic offline LLM-driven planning system. We evaluate NL2Plan on four planning domains and find that it solves 10 out of 15 tasks. In addition to using NL2Plan in end-to-end mode, users can inspect and correct all of its intermediate results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T11:27:13Z)
• Beyond Natural Language: LLMs Leveraging Alternative Formats for Enhanced Reasoning and Communication [79.79948834910579]
  Natural language (NL) has long been the predominant format for human cognition and communication. In this work, we challenge the default use of NL by exploring the utility of non-NL formats in different contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T16:07:54Z)
• On the Roles of LLMs in Planning: Embedding LLMs into Planning Graphs [12.326862964753694]
  We study the insight of the planning capability of large language models (LLMs) in off-the-shelf planning frameworks. We propose a novel LLMs-based planning framework with LLMs embedded in two levels of planning graphs. We empirically exhibit the effectiveness of our proposed framework in various planning domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T15:53:32Z)
• TIC: Translate-Infer-Compile for accurate "text to plan" using LLMs and Logical Representations [0.0]
  We study the problem of generating plans for given natural language planning task requests. Our approach comprises of (a) translate: using an LLM only for generating a interpretable intermediate representation of natural language task description. We observe that using an LLM to only output the intermediate representation significantly reduces LLM errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T18:39:13Z)
• Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models [52.98743860365194]
  We propose a new fine-tuning method called Self-Play fIne-tuNing (SPIN) At the heart of SPIN lies a self-play mechanism, where the LLM refines its capability by playing against instances of itself. This sheds light on the promise of self-play, enabling the achievement of human-level performance in LLMs without the need for expert opponents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T18:53:13Z)
• LLM-Assist: Enhancing Closed-Loop Planning with Language-Based Reasoning [65.86754998249224]
  We develop a novel hybrid planner that leverages a conventional rule-based planner in conjunction with an LLM-based planner. Our approach navigates complex scenarios which existing planners struggle with, produces well-reasoned outputs while also remaining grounded through working alongside the rule-based approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T02:53:45Z)
• AdaPlanner: Adaptive Planning from Feedback with Language Models [56.367020818139665]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated the potential in acting as autonomous agents for sequential decision-making tasks. We propose a closed-loop approach, AdaPlanner, which allows the LLM agent to refine its self-generated plan adaptively in response to environmental feedback. To mitigate hallucination, we develop a code-style LLM prompt structure that facilitates plan generation across a variety of tasks, environments, and agent capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T05:52:27Z)
• AutoPlan: Automatic Planning of Interactive Decision-Making Tasks With Large Language Models [11.895111124804503]
  AutoPlan is an approach to guide LLM-based agents to accomplish interactive decision-making tasks. Our experiments show that AutoPlan achieves success rates on par with the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T11:52:23Z)
• Leveraging Pre-trained Large Language Models to Construct and Utilize World Models for Model-based Task Planning [39.29964085305846]
  Methods that use pre-trained large language models directly as planners are currently impractical due to limited correctness of plans. In this work, we introduce a novel alternative paradigm that constructs an explicit world (domain) model in planning domain definition language (PDDL) and then uses it to plan with sound domain-independent planners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T08:59:15Z)
• Learning to Plan with Natural Language [111.76828049344839]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various basic natural language tasks. For completing the complex task, we still need a plan for the task to guide LLMs to generate the specific solutions step by step. We propose the Learning to Plan method, which involves two phases: (1) In the first learning task plan phase, it iteratively updates the task plan with new step-by-step solutions and behavioral instructions, which are obtained by prompting LLMs to derive from training error feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T17:09:12Z)
• Guiding Large Language Models via Directional Stimulus Prompting [114.84930073977672]
  We introduce Directional Stimulus Prompting, a novel framework for guiding black-box large language models (LLMs) toward specific desired outputs. Instead of directly adjusting LLMs, our method employs a small tunable policy model to generate an auxiliary directional stimulus prompt for each input instance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T17:44:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.