Readout error mitigated quantum state tomography tested on superconducting qubits

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04211v2
• Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:43:45 GMT
• Title: Readout error mitigated quantum state tomography tested on superconducting qubits
• Authors: Adrian Skasberg Aasen, Andras Di Giovanni, Hannes Rotzinger, Alexey V. Ustinov, Martin Gärttner,
• Abstract summary: We test the ability of readout error mitigation to correct realistic noise found in systems composed of quantum two-level objects (qubits) By treating readout error mitigation in the context of state tomography the method becomes largely readout mode-, architecture-, noise source-, and quantum state-independent. We identify noise sources for which readout error mitigation worked well, and observed decreases in readout by a factor of up to 30.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Quantum technologies rely heavily on accurate control and reliable readout of quantum systems. Current experiments are limited by numerous sources of noise that can only be partially captured by simple analytical models and additional characterization of the noise sources is required. We test the ability of readout error mitigation to correct realistic noise found in systems composed of quantum two-level objects (qubits). To probe the limit of such methods, we designed a beyond-classical readout error mitigation protocol based on quantum state tomography (QST), which estimates the density matrix of a quantum system, and quantum detector tomography (QDT), which characterizes the measurement procedure. By treating readout error mitigation in the context of state tomography the method becomes largely readout mode-, architecture-, noise source-, and quantum state-independent. We implement this method on a superconducting qubit and evaluate the increase in reconstruction fidelity for QST. We characterize the performance of the method by varying important noise sources, such as suboptimal readout signal amplification, insufficient resonator photon population, off-resonant qubit drive, and effectively shortened $T_1$ and $T_2$ decay times. As a result, we identified noise sources for which readout error mitigation worked well, and observed decreases in readout infidelity by a factor of up to 30.

Related papers

• Unconditionally decoherence-free quantum error mitigation by density matrix vectorization [4.2630430280861376]
  We give a new paradigm of quantum error mitigation based on the vectorization of density matrices. Our proposal directly changes the way of encoding information and maps the density matrices of noisy quantum states to noiseless pure states. Our protocol requires no knowledge of the noise model, no ability to tune the noise strength, and no ancilla qubits for complicated controlled unitaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T09:55:05Z)
• Lindblad-like quantum tomography for non-Markovian quantum dynamical maps [46.350147604946095]
  We introduce Lindblad-like quantum tomography (L$ell$QT) as a quantum characterization technique of time-correlated noise in quantum information processors. We discuss L$ell$QT for the dephasing dynamics of single qubits in detail, which allows for a neat understanding of the importance of including multiple snapshots of the quantum evolution in the likelihood function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T19:29:12Z)
• Mitigating Errors on Superconducting Quantum Processors through Fuzzy Clustering [38.02852247910155]
  A new Quantum Error Mitigation (QEM) technique uses Fuzzy C-Means clustering to specifically identify measurement error patterns. We report a proof-of-principle validation of the technique on a 2-qubit register, obtained as a subset of a real NISQ 5-qubit superconducting quantum processor. We demonstrate that the FCM-based QEM technique allows for reasonable improvement of the expectation values of single- and two-qubit gates based quantum circuits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T14:02:45Z)
• Power Characterization of Noisy Quantum Kernels [52.47151453259434]
  We show that noise may make quantum kernel methods to only have poor prediction capability, even when the generalization error is small. We provide a crucial warning to employ noisy quantum kernel methods for quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T01:02:16Z)
• Quantum error mitigation for Fourier moment computation [49.1574468325115]
  This paper focuses on the computation of Fourier moments within the context of a nuclear effective field theory on superconducting quantum hardware. The study integrates echo verification and noise renormalization into Hadamard tests using control reversal gates. The analysis, conducted using noise models, reveals a significant reduction in noise strength by two orders of magnitude.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T19:10:24Z)
• Leveraging hardware-control imperfections for error mitigation via generalized quantum subspace [0.8399688944263843]
  In the era of quantum computing without full fault-tolerance, it is essential to suppress noise effects via the quantum error mitigation techniques to enhance the computational power of the quantum devices. One of the most effective noise-agnostic error mitigation schemes is the generalized quantum subspace expansion (GSE) method. We propose the fault-subspace method, which constructs an error-mitigated quantum state with copies of quantum states with different noise levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T07:01:30Z)
• Suppressing Amplitude Damping in Trapped Ions: Discrete Weak Measurements for a Non-unitary Probabilistic Noise Filter [62.997667081978825]
  We introduce a low-overhead protocol to reverse this degradation. We present two trapped-ion schemes for the implementation of a non-unitary probabilistic filter against amplitude damping noise. This filter can be understood as a protocol for single-copy quasi-distillation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-06T18:18:41Z)
• Detecting and Eliminating Quantum Noise of Quantum Measurements [3.871198861387443]
  We first detect and then eliminate quantum noise so that the classical noise assumption is satisfied. We demonstrate the feasibility of the two-stage procedure numerically on Baidu Quantum Platform. Remarkably, the results show that quantum noise in measurement devices is significantly suppressed, and the quantum accuracy is substantially improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T03:58:10Z)
• Error-Mitigated Quantum Metrology via Virtual Purification [0.0]
  We propose an error-mitigated quantum metrology that can filter out unknown fluctuating noise. We demonstrate that our protocol mitigates systematic errors and recovers superclassical scaling in a practical situation with time-inhomogeneous bias-inducing noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-03T11:07:50Z)
• Characterizing quantum instruments: from non-demolition measurements to quantum error correction [48.43720700248091]
  In quantum information processing quantum operations are often processed alongside measurements which result in classical data. Non-unitary dynamical processes can take place on the system, for which common quantum channel descriptions fail to describe the time evolution. Quantum measurements are correctly treated by means of so-called quantum instruments capturing both classical outputs and post-measurement quantum states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T18:00:13Z)
• Efficient and robust certification of genuine multipartite entanglement in noisy quantum error correction circuits [58.720142291102135]
  We introduce a conditional witnessing technique to certify genuine multipartite entanglement (GME) We prove that the detection of entanglement in a linear number of bipartitions by a number of measurements scales linearly, suffices to certify GME. We apply our method to the noisy readout of stabilizer operators of the distance-three topological color code and its flag-based fault-tolerant version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T18:00:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.