Performance of externally validated machine learning models based on histopathology images for the diagnosis, classification, prognosis, or treatment outcome prediction in female breast cancer: A systematic review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06697v1
• Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2023 18:27:56 GMT
• Title: Performance of externally validated machine learning models based on histopathology images for the diagnosis, classification, prognosis, or treatment outcome prediction in female breast cancer: A systematic review
• Authors: Ricardo Gonzalez, Peyman Nejat, Ashirbani Saha, Clinton J.V. Campbell, Andrew P. Norgan, Cynthia Lokker
• Abstract summary: externally validated machine learning models for diagnosis, classification, prognosis, or treatment outcome prediction in female breast cancer. Three studies externally validated ML models for diagnosis, 4 for classification, 2 for prognosis, and 1 for both classification and prognosis. Most studies used Convolutional Neural Networks and one used logistic regression algorithms.
• Score: 0.5792122879054292
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Numerous machine learning (ML) models have been developed for breast cancer using various types of data. Successful external validation (EV) of ML models is important evidence of their generalizability. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the performance of externally validated ML models based on histopathology images for diagnosis, classification, prognosis, or treatment outcome prediction in female breast cancer. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, IEEE, MICCAI, and SPIE conferences was performed for studies published between January 2010 and February 2022. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was employed, and the results were narratively described. Of the 2011 non-duplicated citations, 8 journal articles and 2 conference proceedings met inclusion criteria. Three studies externally validated ML models for diagnosis, 4 for classification, 2 for prognosis, and 1 for both classification and prognosis. Most studies used Convolutional Neural Networks and one used logistic regression algorithms. For diagnostic/classification models, the most common performance metrics reported in the EV were accuracy and area under the curve, which were greater than 87% and 90%, respectively, using pathologists' annotations as ground truth. The hazard ratios in the EV of prognostic ML models were between 1.7 (95% CI, 1.2-2.6) and 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.7) to predict distant disease-free survival; 1.91 (95% CI, 1.11-3.29) for recurrence, and between 0.09 (95% CI, 0.01-0.70) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.43-0.98) for overall survival, using clinical data as ground truth. Despite EV being an important step before the clinical application of a ML model, it hasn't been performed routinely. The large variability in the training/validation datasets, methods, performance metrics, and reported information limited the comparison of the models and the analysis of their results (...)

Related papers

• Using Pre-training and Interaction Modeling for ancestry-specific disease prediction in UK Biobank [69.90493129893112]
  Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered the genetic basis of complex traits, but show an under-representation of non-European descent individuals. Here, we assess whether we can improve disease prediction across diverse ancestries using multiomic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T16:39:50Z)
• Symptom-based Machine Learning Models for the Early Detection of COVID-19: A Narrative Review [0.0]
  Machine learning models can analyze large datasets, incorporating patient-reported symptoms, clinical data, and medical imaging. In this paper, we provide an overview of the landscape of symptoms-only machine learning models for predicting COVID-19, including their performance and limitations. The review will also examine the performance of symptom-based models when compared to image-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T01:41:42Z)
• Multivariate Analysis on Performance Gaps of Artificial Intelligence Models in Screening Mammography [4.123006816939975]
  Deep learning models for abnormality classification can perform well in screening mammography. The demographic, imaging, and clinical characteristics associated with increased risk of model failure remain unclear. We assessed model performance by subgroups defined by age, race, pathologic outcome, tissue density, and imaging characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T02:28:45Z)
• Clinical Deterioration Prediction in Brazilian Hospitals Based on Artificial Neural Networks and Tree Decision Models [56.93322937189087]
  An extremely boosted neural network (XBNet) is used to predict clinical deterioration (CD) The XGBoost model obtained the best results in predicting CD among Brazilian hospitals' data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-17T23:29:14Z)
• On the explainability of hospitalization prediction on a large COVID-19 patient dataset [45.82374977939355]
  We develop various AI models to predict hospitalization on a large (over 110$k$) cohort of COVID-19 positive-tested US patients. Despite high data unbalance, the models reach average precision 0.96-0.98 (0.75-0.85), recall 0.96-0.98 (0.74-0.85), and $F_score 0.97-0.98 (0.79-0.83) on the non-hospitalized (or hospitalized) class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-28T10:23:38Z)
• An Interpretable Web-based Glioblastoma Multiforme Prognosis Prediction Tool using Random Forest Model [1.1024591739346292]
  We propose predictive models that estimate GBM patients' health status of one-year after treatments. We used total of 467 GBM patients' clinical profile consists of 13 features and two follow-up dates. Our machine learning models suggest that the top three prognostic factors for GBM patient survival were MGMT gene promoter, the extent of resection, and age.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-30T07:56:34Z)
• A multi-stage machine learning model on diagnosis of esophageal manometry [50.591267188664666]
  The framework includes deep-learning models at the swallow-level stage and feature-based machine learning models at the study-level stage. This is the first artificial-intelligence-style model to automatically predict CC diagnosis of HRM study from raw multi-swallow data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T20:09:23Z)
• A Real-World Demonstration of Machine Learning Generalizability: Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection on Head CT [5.517017976008718]
  The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that ML model generalizability is achievable in medical imaging. An ML model was trained using 21,784 scans from the RSNA Intracranial Hemorrhage CT dataset. On external validation, the model demonstrated an AUC of 95.4%, sensitivity of 91.3%, and specificity of 94.1%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-09T15:05:48Z)
• UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced Data [81.00385374948125]
  We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model. UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data. We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z)
• Hemogram Data as a Tool for Decision-making in COVID-19 Management: Applications to Resource Scarcity Scenarios [62.997667081978825]
  COVID-19 pandemics has challenged emergency response systems worldwide, with widespread reports of essential services breakdown and collapse of health care structure. This work describes a machine learning model derived from hemogram exam data performed in symptomatic patients. Proposed models can predict COVID-19 qRT-PCR results in symptomatic individuals with high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-10T01:45:03Z)
• A Physiology-Driven Computational Model for Post-Cardiac Arrest Outcome Prediction [0.7930054475711718]
  The aim of this study was to build computational models to predict post-CA outcome. We hypothesized that model performance could be enhanced by integrating physiological time series (PTS) data and by training machine learning (ML) classifiers. Results attest to the effectiveness of ML models for post-CA predictive modeling and suggest that PTS recorded in very early phase after resuscitation encode short-term outcome probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-09T07:53:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.