Uncertainty Quantification in Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation with Gaussian-Process-Based Partially Linear Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10435v1
• Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 12:42:28 GMT
• Title: Uncertainty Quantification in Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation with Gaussian-Process-Based Partially Linear Model
• Authors: Shunsuke Horii, Yoichi Chikahara
• Abstract summary: Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects across individuals has attracted growing attention as a statistical tool for performing critical decision-making. We propose a Bayesian inference framework that quantifies the uncertainty in treatment effect estimation to support decision-making in a relatively small sample size setting.
• Score: 2.1212179660694104
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects across individuals has attracted growing attention as a statistical tool for performing critical decision-making. We propose a Bayesian inference framework that quantifies the uncertainty in treatment effect estimation to support decision-making in a relatively small sample size setting. Our proposed model places Gaussian process priors on the nonparametric components of a semiparametric model called a partially linear model. This model formulation has three advantages. First, we can analytically compute the posterior distribution of a treatment effect without relying on the computationally demanding posterior approximation. Second, we can guarantee that the posterior distribution concentrates around the true one as the sample size goes to infinity. Third, we can incorporate prior knowledge about a treatment effect into the prior distribution, improving the estimation efficiency. Our experimental results show that even in the small sample size setting, our method can accurately estimate the heterogeneous treatment effects and effectively quantify its estimation uncertainty.

Related papers

• Estimating Distributional Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments: Machine Learning for Variance Reduction [6.909352249236339]
  We propose a novel regression adjustment method designed for estimating distributional treatment effect parameters in randomized experiments. Our approach incorporates pre-treatment co-treatments into a distributional regression framework, utilizing machine learning techniques to improve the precision of distributional treatment effect estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T20:28:29Z)
• Individualized Multi-Treatment Response Curves Estimation using RBF-net with Shared Neurons [1.1119247609126184]
  Our non-parametric modeling of the response curves relies on radial basis function (RBF)-nets with shared hidden neurons. Applying our proposed method to MIMIC data, we obtain several interesting findings related to the impact of different treatment strategies on the length of ICU stay and 12-hour SOFA score for sepsis patients who are home-discharged.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T21:13:01Z)
• Selective Nonparametric Regression via Testing [54.20569354303575]
  We develop an abstention procedure via testing the hypothesis on the value of the conditional variance at a given point. Unlike existing methods, the proposed one allows to account not only for the value of the variance itself but also for the uncertainty of the corresponding variance predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T13:04:11Z)
• Asymptotically Unbiased Synthetic Control Methods by Distribution Matching [14.030354616779325]
  Existing Synthetic Control Methods (SCMs) suffer from an endogeneity problem, the correlation between the outcomes of untreated units and the error term of the synthetic control, which yields a bias in the treatment effect estimator. We propose a novel SCM based on density matching, assuming that the density of outcomes of the treated unit can be approximated by a weighted average of the joint density of untreated units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T15:52:22Z)
• Bayesian Counterfactual Mean Embeddings and Off-Policy Evaluation [10.75801980090826]
  We present three novel Bayesian methods to estimate the expectation of the ultimate treatment effect. These methods differ on the source of uncertainty considered and allow for combining two sources of data. We generalize these ideas to the off-policy evaluation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T23:39:36Z)
• Off-policy estimation of linear functionals: Non-asymptotic theory for semi-parametric efficiency [59.48096489854697]
  The problem of estimating a linear functional based on observational data is canonical in both the causal inference and bandit literatures. We prove non-asymptotic upper bounds on the mean-squared error of such procedures. We establish its instance-dependent optimality in finite samples via matching non-asymptotic local minimax lower bounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T23:50:55Z)
• Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
  Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem. Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools. We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z)
• Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
  Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects. We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders. We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z)
• Weighting-Based Treatment Effect Estimation via Distribution Learning [14.438302755258547]
  We develop a distribution learning-based weighting method for treatment effect estimation. Our method outperforms several cutting-edge weighting-only benchmarking methods. It maintains its advantage under a doubly-robust estimation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-26T20:15:44Z)
• Bayesian prognostic covariate adjustment [59.75318183140857]
  Historical data about disease outcomes can be integrated into the analysis of clinical trials in many ways. We build on existing literature that uses prognostic scores from a predictive model to increase the efficiency of treatment effect estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T05:19:03Z)
• Increasing the efficiency of randomized trial estimates via linear adjustment for a prognostic score [59.75318183140857]
  Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is central to clinical research. Most methods for historical borrowing achieve reductions in variance by sacrificing strict type-I error rate control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T21:10:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.