Stable and Interpretable Deep Learning for Tabular Data: Introducing InterpreTabNet with the Novel InterpreStability Metric

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02870v1
• Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 15:04:13 GMT
• Title: Stable and Interpretable Deep Learning for Tabular Data: Introducing InterpreTabNet with the Novel InterpreStability Metric
• Authors: Shiyun Wa, Xinai Lu, Minjuan Wang
• Abstract summary: We introduce InterpreTabNet, a model designed to enhance both classification accuracy and interpretability. We also present a novel evaluation metric, InterpreStability, which quantifies the stability of a model's interpretability.
• Score: 4.362293468843233
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As Artificial Intelligence (AI) integrates deeper into diverse sectors, the quest for powerful models has intensified. While significant strides have been made in boosting model capabilities and their applicability across domains, a glaring challenge persists: many of these state-of-the-art models remain as black boxes. This opacity not only complicates the explanation of model decisions to end-users but also obstructs insights into intermediate processes for model designers. To address these challenges, we introduce InterpreTabNet, a model designed to enhance both classification accuracy and interpretability by leveraging the TabNet architecture with an improved attentive module. This design ensures robust gradient propagation and computational stability. Additionally, we present a novel evaluation metric, InterpreStability, which quantifies the stability of a model's interpretability. The proposed model and metric mark a significant stride forward in explainable models' research, setting a standard for transparency and interpretability in AI model design and application across diverse sectors. InterpreTabNet surpasses other leading solutions in tabular data analysis across varied application scenarios, paving the way for further research into creating deep-learning models that are both highly accurate and inherently explainable. The introduction of the InterpreStability metric ensures that the interpretability of future models can be measured and compared in a consistent and rigorous manner. Collectively, these contributions have the potential to promote the design principles and development of next-generation interpretable AI models, widening the adoption of interpretable AI solutions in critical decision-making environments.

Related papers

• DLBacktrace: A Model Agnostic Explainability for any Deep Learning Models [1.747623282473278]
  Deep learning models operate as opaque 'black boxes' with limited transparency in their decision-making processes. This study addresses the pressing need for interpretability in AI systems, emphasizing its role in fostering trust, ensuring accountability, and promoting responsible deployment in mission-critical fields. We introduce DLBacktrace, an innovative technique developed by the AryaXAI team to illuminate model decisions across a wide array of domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T16:54:30Z)
• Investigating the Role of Instruction Variety and Task Difficulty in Robotic Manipulation Tasks [50.75902473813379]
  This work introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework that systematically examines the role of instructions and inputs in the generalisation abilities of such models. The proposed framework uncovers the resilience of multimodal models to extreme instruction perturbations and their vulnerability to observational changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T14:36:49Z)
• SynthTree: Co-supervised Local Model Synthesis for Explainable Prediction [15.832975722301011]
  We propose a novel method to enhance explainability with minimal accuracy loss. We have developed novel methods for estimating nodes by leveraging AI techniques. Our findings highlight the critical role that statistical methodologies can play in advancing explainable AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T14:43:01Z)
• Model-Agnostic Interpretation Framework in Machine Learning: A Comparative Study in NBA Sports [0.2937071029942259]
  We propose an innovative framework to reconcile the trade-off between model performance and interpretability. Our approach is centered around modular operations on high-dimensional data, which enable end-to-end processing while preserving interpretability. We have extensively tested our framework and validated its superior efficacy in achieving a balance between computational efficiency and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T04:25:21Z)
• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• Cross Feature Selection to Eliminate Spurious Interactions and Single Feature Dominance Explainable Boosting Machines [0.0]
  Interpretability is essential for legal, ethical, and practical reasons. High-performance models can suffer from spurious interactions with redundant features and single-feature dominance. In this paper, we explore novel approaches to address these issues by utilizing alternate Cross-feature selection, ensemble features and model configuration alteration techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T13:47:41Z)
• Incorporating Domain Knowledge in Deep Neural Networks for Discrete Choice Models [0.5801044612920815]
  This paper proposes a framework that expands the potential of data-driven approaches for DCM. It includes pseudo data samples that represent required relationships and a loss function that measures their fulfillment. A case study demonstrates the potential of this framework for discrete choice analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T12:53:55Z)
• Scaling Vision-Language Models with Sparse Mixture of Experts [128.0882767889029]
  We show that mixture-of-experts (MoE) techniques can achieve state-of-the-art performance on a range of benchmarks over dense models of equivalent computational cost. Our research offers valuable insights into stabilizing the training of MoE models, understanding the impact of MoE on model interpretability, and balancing the trade-offs between compute performance when scaling vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T16:00:31Z)
• Large Language Models with Controllable Working Memory [64.71038763708161]
  Large language models (LLMs) have led to a series of breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP) What further sets these models apart is the massive amounts of world knowledge they internalize during pretraining. How the model's world knowledge interacts with the factual information presented in the context remains under explored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T18:58:29Z)
• DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
  We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models. Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z)
• Generative Counterfactuals for Neural Networks via Attribute-Informed Perturbation [51.29486247405601]
  We design a framework to generate counterfactuals for raw data instances with the proposed Attribute-Informed Perturbation (AIP) By utilizing generative models conditioned with different attributes, counterfactuals with desired labels can be obtained effectively and efficiently. Experimental results on real-world texts and images demonstrate the effectiveness, sample quality as well as efficiency of our designed framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T08:37:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.