Reliability and Interpretability in Science and Deep Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07359v3
• Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 06:18:04 GMT
• Title: Reliability and Interpretability in Science and Deep Learning
• Authors: Luigi Scorzato,
• Abstract summary: This article focuses on the comparison between traditional scientific models and Deep Neural Network (DNN) models. It argues that the high complexity of DNN models hinders the estimate of their reliability and also their prospect of long-term progress. It also clarifies how interpretability is a precondition for assessing the reliability of any model, which cannot be based on statistical analysis alone.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent years, the question of the reliability of Machine Learning (ML) methods has acquired significant importance, and the analysis of the associated uncertainties has motivated a growing amount of research. However, most of these studies have applied standard error analysis to ML models, and in particular Deep Neural Network (DNN) models, which represent a rather significant departure from standard scientific modelling. It is therefore necessary to integrate the standard error analysis with a deeper epistemological analysis of the possible differences between DNN models and standard scientific modelling and the possible implications of these differences in the assessment of reliability. This article offers several contributions. First, it emphasises the ubiquitous role of model assumptions (both in ML and traditional Science) against the illusion of theory-free science. Secondly, model assumptions are analysed from the point of view of their (epistemic) complexity, which is shown to be language-independent. It is argued that the high epistemic complexity of DNN models hinders the estimate of their reliability and also their prospect of long-term progress. Some potential ways forward are suggested. Thirdly, this article identifies the close relation between a model's epistemic complexity and its interpretability, as introduced in the context of responsible AI. This clarifies in which sense, and to what extent, the lack of understanding of a model (black-box problem) impacts its interpretability in a way that is independent of individual skills. It also clarifies how interpretability is a precondition for assessing the reliability of any model, which cannot be based on statistical analysis alone. This article focuses on the comparison between traditional scientific models and DNN models. But, Random Forest and Logistic Regression models are also briefly considered.

Related papers

• Beyond Interpretability: The Gains of Feature Monosemanticity on Model Robustness [68.69369585600698]
  Deep learning models often suffer from a lack of interpretability due to polysemanticity. Recent advances in monosemanticity, where neurons correspond to consistent and distinct semantics, have significantly improved interpretability. We show that monosemantic features not only enhance interpretability but also bring concrete gains in model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T18:03:20Z)
• Hard to Explain: On the Computational Hardness of In-Distribution Model Interpretation [0.9558392439655016]
  The ability to interpret Machine Learning (ML) models is becoming increasingly essential. Recent work has demonstrated that it is possible to formally assess interpretability by studying the computational complexity of explaining the decisions of various models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T17:20:52Z)
• Towards Compositional Interpretability for XAI [3.3768167170511587]
  We present an approach to defining AI models and their interpretability based on category theory. We compare a wide range of AI models as compositional models. We find that what makes the standard 'intrinsically interpretable' models so transparent is brought out most clearly diagrammatically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T14:27:03Z)
• SynthTree: Co-supervised Local Model Synthesis for Explainable Prediction [15.832975722301011]
  We propose a novel method to enhance explainability with minimal accuracy loss. We have developed novel methods for estimating nodes by leveraging AI techniques. Our findings highlight the critical role that statistical methodologies can play in advancing explainable AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T14:43:01Z)
• Identifiable Latent Polynomial Causal Models Through the Lens of Change [82.14087963690561]
  Causal representation learning aims to unveil latent high-level causal representations from observed low-level data. One of its primary tasks is to provide reliable assurance of identifying these latent causal models, known as identifiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T07:46:10Z)
• Are Neural Topic Models Broken? [81.15470302729638]
  We study the relationship between automated and human evaluation of topic models. We find that neural topic models fare worse in both respects compared to an established classical method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T14:38:50Z)
• Neural Causal Models for Counterfactual Identification and Estimation [62.30444687707919]
  We study the evaluation of counterfactual statements through neural models. First, we show that neural causal models (NCMs) are expressive enough. Second, we develop an algorithm for simultaneously identifying and estimating counterfactual distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T18:29:09Z)
• Learning continuous models for continuous physics [94.42705784823997]
  We develop a test based on numerical analysis theory to validate machine learning models for science and engineering applications. Our results illustrate how principled numerical analysis methods can be coupled with existing ML training/testing methodologies to validate models for science and engineering applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T07:56:46Z)
• Towards Comparative Physical Interpretation of Spatial Variability Aware Neural Networks: A Summary of Results [0.7297229770329212]
  Given spatial Variability Aware Neural Networks (SVANNs), the goal is to investigate mathematical (or computational) models for comparative physical interpretation. This work investigates physical interpretation of SVANNs using novel comparative approaches based on geographically heterogeneous features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T15:40:42Z)
• Mixture of Linear Models Co-supervised by Deep Neural Networks [14.831346286039151]
  We propose an approach to fill the gap between relatively simple explainable models and deep neural network (DNN) models. Our main idea is a mixture of discriminative models that is trained with the guidance from a DNN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-05T02:08:35Z)
• A comprehensive comparative evaluation and analysis of Distributional Semantic Models [61.41800660636555]
  We perform a comprehensive evaluation of type distributional vectors, either produced by static DSMs or obtained by averaging the contextualized vectors generated by BERT. The results show that the alleged superiority of predict based models is more apparent than real, and surely not ubiquitous. We borrow from cognitive neuroscience the methodology of Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) to inspect the semantic spaces generated by distributional models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T15:18:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.