Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00157v4
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:20:59 GMT
- Title: Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges
- Authors: Janice Ahn, Rishu Verma, Renze Lou, Di Liu, Rui Zhang, Wenpeng Yin,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are geared towards the automated resolution of mathematical problems.
This survey endeavors to address four pivotal dimensions.
It provides a holistic perspective on the current state, accomplishments, and future challenges in this rapidly evolving field.
- Score: 15.925641169201747
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Mathematical reasoning serves as a cornerstone for assessing the fundamental cognitive capabilities of human intelligence. In recent times, there has been a notable surge in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) geared towards the automated resolution of mathematical problems. However, the landscape of mathematical problem types is vast and varied, with LLM-oriented techniques undergoing evaluation across diverse datasets and settings. This diversity makes it challenging to discern the true advancements and obstacles within this burgeoning field. This survey endeavors to address four pivotal dimensions: i) a comprehensive exploration of the various mathematical problems and their corresponding datasets that have been investigated; ii) an examination of the spectrum of LLM-oriented techniques that have been proposed for mathematical problem-solving; iii) an overview of factors and concerns affecting LLMs in solving math; and iv) an elucidation of the persisting challenges within this domain. To the best of our knowledge, this survey stands as one of the first extensive examinations of the landscape of LLMs in the realm of mathematics, providing a holistic perspective on the current state, accomplishments, and future challenges in this rapidly evolving field.
Related papers
- LLM Reasoning Engine: Specialized Training for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoning [7.512199306943756]
We present a novel method to enhance Large Language Models' capabilities in mathematical reasoning tasks.
Motivated by the need to bridge this gap, our approach incorporates a question paraphrase strategy.
specialized training objectives are employed to guide the model's learning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-28T17:48:33Z) - A Survey of Mathematical Reasoning in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Model: Benchmark, Method & Challenges [25.82535441866882]
This survey provides the first comprehensive analysis of mathematical reasoning in the era of multimodal large language models (MLLMs)
We review over 200 studies published since 2021, and examine the state-of-the-art developments in Math-LLMs.
In particular, we explore multimodal mathematical reasoning pipeline, as well as the role of (M)LLMs and the associated methodologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T16:21:41Z) - Polymath: A Challenging Multi-modal Mathematical Reasoning Benchmark [53.61633384281524]
PolyMATH is a benchmark aimed at evaluating the general cognitive reasoning abilities of MLLMs.
The best scores achieved on PolyMATH are 41%, 36%, and 27%, obtained by Claude-3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o and Gemini-1.5 Pro respectively.
A further fine-grained error analysis reveals that these models struggle to understand spatial relations and perform drawn-out, high-level reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-06T20:35:41Z) - ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection [60.297079601066784]
We introduce ErrorRadar, the first benchmark designed to assess MLLMs' capabilities in error detection.
ErrorRadar evaluates two sub-tasks: error step identification and error categorization.
It consists of 2,500 high-quality multimodal K-12 mathematical problems, collected from real-world student interactions.
Results indicate significant challenges still remain, as GPT-4o with best performance is still around 10% behind human evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-06T14:59:09Z) - MathOdyssey: Benchmarking Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills in Large Language Models Using Odyssey Math Data [20.31528845718877]
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language understanding and demonstrated strong problem-solving abilities.
This paper investigates the mathematical problem-solving capabilities of LLMs using the newly developed "MathOdyssey" dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-26T13:02:35Z) - Mathify: Evaluating Large Language Models on Mathematical Problem Solving Tasks [34.09857430966818]
We introduce an extensive mathematics dataset called "MathQuest" sourced from the 11th and 12th standard Mathematics NCERT textbooks.
We conduct fine-tuning experiments with three prominent large language models: LLaMA-2, WizardMath, and MAmmoTH.
Our experiments reveal that among the three models, MAmmoTH-13B emerges as the most proficient, achieving the highest level of competence in solving the presented mathematical problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T08:45:42Z) - G-LLaVA: Solving Geometric Problem with Multi-Modal Large Language Model [124.68242155098189]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable proficiency in human-level reasoning and generation capabilities.
G-LLaVA demonstrates exceptional performance in solving geometric problems, significantly outperforming GPT-4-V on the MathVista benchmark with only 7B parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-18T17:36:20Z) - Mathematical Language Models: A Survey [29.419915295762692]
This paper conducts a comprehensive survey of mathematical LMs, systematically categorizing pivotal research endeavors from two distinct perspectives: tasks and methodologies.
The survey entails the compilation of over 60 mathematical datasets, including training datasets, benchmark datasets, and augmented datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-12T01:39:16Z) - MacGyver: Are Large Language Models Creative Problem Solvers? [87.70522322728581]
We explore the creative problem-solving capabilities of modern LLMs in a novel constrained setting.
We create MACGYVER, an automatically generated dataset consisting of over 1,600 real-world problems.
We present our collection to both LLMs and humans to compare and contrast their problem-solving abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T08:52:27Z) - SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Models [70.5763210869525]
We introduce an expansive benchmark suite SciBench for Large Language Model (LLM)
SciBench contains a dataset featuring a range of collegiate-level scientific problems from mathematics, chemistry, and physics domains.
The results reveal that the current LLMs fall short of delivering satisfactory performance, with the best overall score of merely 43.22%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-20T07:01:57Z) - Heterogeneous Representation Learning: A Review [66.12816399765296]
Heterogeneous Representation Learning (HRL) brings some unique challenges.
We present a unified learning framework which is able to model most existing learning settings with the heterogeneous inputs.
We highlight the challenges that are less-touched in HRL and present future research directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-28T05:12:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.