From Variability to Stability: Advancing RecSys Benchmarking Practices

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09766v1
• Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:35:52 GMT
• Title: From Variability to Stability: Advancing RecSys Benchmarking Practices
• Authors: Valeriy Shevchenko, Nikita Belousov, Alexey Vasilev, Vladimir Zholobov, Artyom Sosedka, Natalia Semenova, Anna Volodkevich, Andrey Savchenko, Alexey Zaytsev
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a novel benchmarking methodology to facilitate a fair and robust comparison of RecSys algorithms. By utilizing a diverse set of $30$ open datasets, including two introduced in this work, we critically examine the influence of dataset characteristics on algorithm performance.
• Score: 3.458464808497421
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the rapidly evolving domain of Recommender Systems (RecSys), new algorithms frequently claim state-of-the-art performance based on evaluations over a limited set of arbitrarily selected datasets. However, this approach may fail to holistically reflect their effectiveness due to the significant impact of dataset characteristics on algorithm performance. Addressing this deficiency, this paper introduces a novel benchmarking methodology to facilitate a fair and robust comparison of RecSys algorithms, thereby advancing evaluation practices. By utilizing a diverse set of $30$ open datasets, including two introduced in this work, and evaluating $11$ collaborative filtering algorithms across $9$ metrics, we critically examine the influence of dataset characteristics on algorithm performance. We further investigate the feasibility of aggregating outcomes from multiple datasets into a unified ranking. Through rigorous experimental analysis, we validate the reliability of our methodology under the variability of datasets, offering a benchmarking strategy that balances quality and computational demands. This methodology enables a fair yet effective means of evaluating RecSys algorithms, providing valuable guidance for future research endeavors.

Related papers

• RHiOTS: A Framework for Evaluating Hierarchical Time Series Forecasting Algorithms [0.393259574660092]
  RHiOTS is designed to assess the robustness of hierarchical time series forecasting models and algorithms on real-world datasets. RHiOTS incorporates an innovative visualization component, turning complex, multidimensional robustness evaluation results into intuitive, easily interpretable visuals. Our findings show that traditional statistical methods are more robust than state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms, except when the transformation effect is highly disruptive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T18:52:15Z)
• Are we making progress in unlearning? Findings from the first NeurIPS unlearning competition [70.60872754129832]
  First NeurIPS competition on unlearning sought to stimulate the development of novel algorithms. Nearly 1,200 teams from across the world participated. We analyze top solutions and delve into discussions on benchmarking unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T12:58:00Z)
• Neural Dynamic Data Valuation [4.286118155737111]
  We propose a novel data valuation method from the perspective of optimal control, named the neural dynamic data valuation (NDDV) Our method has solid theoretical interpretations to accurately identify the data valuation via the sensitivity of the data optimal control state. In addition, we implement a data re-weighting strategy to capture the unique features of data points, ensuring fairness through the interaction between data points and the mean-field states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T13:39:26Z)
• Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimisation for Fairness-Aware Self Adjusting Memory Classifiers in Data Streams [2.8366371519410887]
  We introduce a novel approach to enhance fairness in machine learning algorithms applied to data stream classification. The proposed approach integrates the strengths of the self-adjusting memory K-Nearest-Neighbour algorithm with evolutionary multi-objective optimisation. We show that the proposed approach maintains competitive accuracy and significantly reduces discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T10:59:04Z)
• High-dimensional Contextual Bandit Problem without Sparsity [8.782204980889077]
  We propose an explore-then-commit (EtC) algorithm to address this problem and examine its performance. We derive the optimal rate of the ETC algorithm in terms of $T$ and show that this rate can be achieved by balancing exploration and exploitation. We introduce an adaptive explore-then-commit (AEtC) algorithm that adaptively finds the optimal balance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-19T15:29:32Z)
• Improved Policy Evaluation for Randomized Trials of Algorithmic Resource Allocation [54.72195809248172]
  We present a new estimator leveraging our proposed novel concept, that involves retrospective reshuffling of participants across experimental arms at the end of an RCT. We prove theoretically that such an estimator is more accurate than common estimators based on sample means.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T05:17:22Z)
• Doing Great at Estimating CATE? On the Neglected Assumptions in Benchmark Comparisons of Treatment Effect Estimators [91.3755431537592]
  We show that even in arguably the simplest setting, estimation under ignorability assumptions can be misleading. We consider two popular machine learning benchmark datasets for evaluation of heterogeneous treatment effect estimators. We highlight that the inherent characteristics of the benchmark datasets favor some algorithms over others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T13:21:27Z)
• Performance Evaluation of Adversarial Attacks: Discrepancies and Solutions [51.8695223602729]
  adversarial attack methods have been developed to challenge the robustness of machine learning models. We propose a Piece-wise Sampling Curving (PSC) toolkit to effectively address the discrepancy. PSC toolkit offers options for balancing the computational cost and evaluation effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-22T14:36:51Z)
• Test Score Algorithms for Budgeted Stochastic Utility Maximization [12.360522095604983]
  We extend an existing scoring mechanism, namely the replication test scores, to incorporate heterogeneous item costs as well as item values. Our algorithms and approximation guarantees assume that test scores are noisy estimates of certain expected values. We show how our algorithm can be adapted to the setting where items arrive in a fashion while maintaining the same approximation guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-30T15:28:41Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)
• Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness [61.767399505764736]
  We consider fairness in the integration component of data management. We propose an approach to identify a sub-collection of features that ensure the fairness of the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:20:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.