Predictive Uncertainty Quantification via Risk Decompositions for Strictly Proper Scoring Rules

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10727v2
• Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 15:52:17 GMT
• Title: Predictive Uncertainty Quantification via Risk Decompositions for Strictly Proper Scoring Rules
• Authors: Nikita Kotelevskii, Maxim Panov,
• Abstract summary: Uncertainty in predictive modeling often relies on ad hoc methods. This paper introduces a theoretical approach to understanding uncertainty through statistical risks. We show how to split pointwise risk into Bayes risk and excess risk.
• Score: 7.0549244915538765
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Uncertainty quantification in predictive modeling often relies on ad hoc methods as there is no universally accepted formal framework for that. This paper introduces a theoretical approach to understanding uncertainty through statistical risks, distinguishing between aleatoric (data-related) and epistemic (model-related) uncertainties. We explain how to split pointwise risk into Bayes risk and excess risk. In particular, we show that excess risk, related to epistemic uncertainty, aligns with Bregman divergences. To turn considered risk measures into actual uncertainty estimates, we suggest using the Bayesian approach by approximating the risks with the help of posterior distributions. We tested our method on image datasets, evaluating its performance in detecting out-of-distribution and misclassified data using the AUROC metric. Our results confirm the effectiveness of the considered approach and offer practical guidance for estimating uncertainty in real-world applications.

Related papers

• Data-driven decision-making under uncertainty with entropic risk measure [5.407319151576265]
  The entropic risk measure is widely used in high-stakes decision making to account for tail risks associated with an uncertain loss. To debias the empirical entropic risk estimator, we propose a strongly consistent bootstrapping procedure. We show that cross validation methods can result in significantly higher out-of-sample risk for the insurer if the bias in validation performance is not corrected for.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T04:02:52Z)
• Data-Adaptive Tradeoffs among Multiple Risks in Distribution-Free Prediction [55.77015419028725]
  We develop methods that permit valid control of risk when threshold and tradeoff parameters are chosen adaptively. Our methodology supports monotone and nearly-monotone risks, but otherwise makes no distributional assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T17:28:06Z)
• A unified uncertainty-aware exploration: Combining epistemic and aleatory uncertainty [21.139502047972684]
  We propose an algorithm that quantifies the combined effect of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty for risk-sensitive exploration. Our method builds on a novel extension of distributional RL that estimates a parameterized return distribution. Experimental results on tasks with exploration and risk challenges show that our method outperforms alternative approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T17:39:00Z)
• One step closer to unbiased aleatoric uncertainty estimation [71.55174353766289]
  We propose a new estimation method by actively de-noising the observed data. By conducting a broad range of experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed approach provides a much closer approximation to the actual data uncertainty than the standard method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T14:59:11Z)
• Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
  We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity. The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z)
• Detecting and Mitigating Test-time Failure Risks via Model-agnostic Uncertainty Learning [30.86992077157326]
  This paper introduces Risk Advisor, a novel post-hoc meta-learner for estimating failure risks and predictive uncertainties of any already-trained black-box classification model. In addition to providing a risk score, the Risk Advisor decomposes the uncertainty estimates into aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty components. Experiments on various families of black-box classification models and on real-world and synthetic datasets show that the Risk Advisor reliably predicts deployment-time failure risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-09T17:23:31Z)
• Adversarial Attack for Uncertainty Estimation: Identifying Critical Regions in Neural Networks [0.0]
  We propose a novel method to capture data points near decision boundary in neural network that are often referred to a specific type of uncertainty. Uncertainty estimates are derived from the input perturbations, unlike previous studies that provide perturbations on the model's parameters. We show that the proposed method has revealed a significant outperformance over other methods and provided less risk to capture model uncertainty in machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-15T21:30:26Z)
• DEUP: Direct Epistemic Uncertainty Prediction [56.087230230128185]
  Epistemic uncertainty is part of out-of-sample prediction error due to the lack of knowledge of the learner. We propose a principled approach for directly estimating epistemic uncertainty by learning to predict generalization error and subtracting an estimate of aleatoric uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T23:50:35Z)
• The Aleatoric Uncertainty Estimation Using a Separate Formulation with Virtual Residuals [51.71066839337174]
  Existing methods can quantify the error in the target estimation, but they tend to underestimate it. We propose a new separable formulation for the estimation of a signal and of its uncertainty, avoiding the effect of overfitting. We demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms a state-of-the-art technique for signal and uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T12:11:27Z)
• Learning to Predict Error for MRI Reconstruction [67.76632988696943]
  We demonstrate that predictive uncertainty estimated by the current methods does not highly correlate with prediction error. We propose a novel method that estimates the target labels and magnitude of the prediction error in two steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T15:55:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.