Soft Reasoning on Uncertain Knowledge Graphs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.01508v1
• Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 13:13:53 GMT
• Title: Soft Reasoning on Uncertain Knowledge Graphs
• Authors: Weizhi Fei, Zihao Wang, Hang Yin, Yang Duan, Hanghang Tong, Yangqiu Song
• Abstract summary: We study the setting of soft queries on uncertain knowledge, which is motivated by the establishment of soft constraint programming. We propose an ML-based approach with both forward inference and backward calibration to answer soft queries on large-scale, incomplete, and uncertain knowledge graphs.
• Score: 85.1968214421899
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The study of machine learning-based logical query-answering enables reasoning with large-scale and incomplete knowledge graphs. This paper further advances this line of research by considering the uncertainty in the knowledge. The uncertain nature of knowledge is widely observed in the real world, but \textit{does not} align seamlessly with the first-order logic underpinning existing studies. To bridge this gap, we study the setting of soft queries on uncertain knowledge, which is motivated by the establishment of soft constraint programming. We further propose an ML-based approach with both forward inference and backward calibration to answer soft queries on large-scale, incomplete, and uncertain knowledge graphs. Theoretical discussions present that our methods share the same complexity as state-of-the-art inference algorithms for first-order queries. Empirical results justify the superior performance of our approach against previous ML-based methods with number embedding extensions.

Related papers

• Mindful-RAG: A Study of Points of Failure in Retrieval Augmented Generation [11.471919529192048]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are proficient at generating coherent and contextually relevant text. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems mitigate this by incorporating external knowledge sources, such as structured knowledge graphs (KGs) Our study investigates this dilemma by analyzing error patterns in existing KG-based RAG methods and identifying eight critical failure points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T23:50:07Z)
• Hierarchical Deconstruction of LLM Reasoning: A Graph-Based Framework for Analyzing Knowledge Utilization [30.349165483935682]
  How large language models (LLMs) use their knowledge for reasoning is not yet well understood. We develop the DepthQA dataset, deconstructing questions into three depths: (i) recalling conceptual knowledge, (ii) applying procedural knowledge, and (iii) analyzing strategic knowledge. Distinct patterns of discrepancies are observed across model capacity and possibility of training data memorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T19:29:36Z)
• Knowledge of Knowledge: Exploring Known-Unknowns Uncertainty with Large Language Models [44.117620571329596]
  We focus on addressing known-unknown questions, characterized by high uncertainty due to the absence of definitive answers. To facilitate our study, we collect a new dataset with Known-Unknown Questions (KUQ) We examine the performance of open-source LLMs, fine-tuned using this dataset, in distinguishing between known and unknown queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T05:59:21Z)
• Rethinking Complex Queries on Knowledge Graphs with Neural Link Predictors [58.340159346749964]
  We propose a new neural-symbolic method to support end-to-end learning using complex queries with provable reasoning capability. We develop a new dataset containing ten new types of queries with features that have never been considered. Our method outperforms previous methods significantly in the new dataset and also surpasses previous methods in the existing dataset at the same time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T11:35:35Z)
• Towards a Holistic Understanding of Mathematical Questions with Contrastive Pre-training [65.10741459705739]
  We propose a novel contrastive pre-training approach for mathematical question representations, namely QuesCo. We first design two-level question augmentations, including content-level and structure-level, which generate literally diverse question pairs with similar purposes. Then, to fully exploit hierarchical information of knowledge concepts, we propose a knowledge hierarchy-aware rank strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-18T14:23:29Z)
• A Unified End-to-End Retriever-Reader Framework for Knowledge-based VQA [67.75989848202343]
  This paper presents a unified end-to-end retriever-reader framework towards knowledge-based VQA. We shed light on the multi-modal implicit knowledge from vision-language pre-training models to mine its potential in knowledge reasoning. Our scheme is able to not only provide guidance for knowledge retrieval, but also drop these instances potentially error-prone towards question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T02:35:04Z)
• Principled Knowledge Extrapolation with GANs [92.62635018136476]
  We study counterfactual synthesis from a new perspective of knowledge extrapolation. We show that an adversarial game with a closed-form discriminator can be used to address the knowledge extrapolation problem. Our method enjoys both elegant theoretical guarantees and superior performance in many scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T08:39:42Z)
• Efficient Performance Bounds for Primal-Dual Reinforcement Learning from Demonstrations [1.0609815608017066]
  We consider large-scale Markov decision processes with an unknown cost function and address the problem of learning a policy from a finite set of expert demonstrations. Existing inverse reinforcement learning methods come with strong theoretical guarantees, but are computationally expensive. We introduce a novel bilinear saddle-point framework using Lagrangian duality to bridge the gap between theory and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-28T05:47:24Z)
• Constrained Learning with Non-Convex Losses [119.8736858597118]
  Though learning has become a core technology of modern information processing, there is now ample evidence that it can lead to biased, unsafe, and prejudiced solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T23:10:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.