TwoStep: Multi-agent Task Planning using Classical Planners and Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17246v1
• Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 22:47:13 GMT
• Title: TwoStep: Multi-agent Task Planning using Classical Planners and Large Language Models
• Authors: Ishika Singh, David Traum, Jesse Thomason,
• Abstract summary: Two-agent planning goal decomposition leads to faster planning times than solving multi-agent PDDL problems directly. We find that LLM-based approximations of subgoals can achieve similar multi-agent execution steps than those specified by human experts.
• Score: 7.653791106386385
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Classical planning formulations like the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) admit action sequences guaranteed to achieve a goal state given an initial state if any are possible. However, reasoning problems defined in PDDL do not capture temporal aspects of action taking, for example that two agents in the domain can execute an action simultaneously if postconditions of each do not interfere with preconditions of the other. A human expert can decompose a goal into largely independent constituent parts and assign each agent to one of these subgoals to take advantage of simultaneous actions for faster execution of plan steps, each using only single agent planning. By contrast, large language models (LLMs) used for directly inferring plan steps do not guarantee execution success, but do leverage commonsense reasoning to assemble action sequences. We combine the strengths of classical planning and LLMs by approximating human intuitions for two-agent planning goal decomposition. We demonstrate that LLM-based goal decomposition leads to faster planning times than solving multi-agent PDDL problems directly while simultaneously achieving fewer plan execution steps than a single agent plan alone and preserving execution success. Additionally, we find that LLM-based approximations of subgoals can achieve similar multi-agent execution steps than those specified by human experts. Website and resources at https://glamor-usc.github.io/twostep

Related papers

• Scaling Up Natural Language Understanding for Multi-Robots Through the Lens of Hierarchy [8.180994118420053]
  Long-horizon planning is hindered by challenges such as uncertainty accumulation, computational complexity, delayed rewards and incomplete information. This work proposes an approach to exploit the task hierarchy from human instructions to facilitate multi-robot planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T14:46:13Z)
• Language Models can Infer Action Semantics for Symbolic Planners from Environment Feedback [26.03718733867297]
  We propose Predicting Semantics of Actions with Language Models (PSALM) PSALM learns action semantics by leveraging the strengths of both symbolic planners and Large Language Models (LLMs) Experiments show PSALM boosts plan success rate from 36.4% (on Claude-3.5) to 100%, and explores the environment more efficiently than prior work to infer ground truth domain action semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T21:29:56Z)
• NL2Plan: Robust LLM-Driven Planning from Minimal Text Descriptions [8.004470925893957]
  We present NL2Plan, the first domain-agnostic offline LLM-driven planning system. We evaluate NL2Plan on four planning domains and find that it solves 10 out of 15 tasks. In addition to using NL2Plan in end-to-end mode, users can inspect and correct all of its intermediate results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T11:27:13Z)
• ADaPT: As-Needed Decomposition and Planning with Language Models [131.063805299796]
  We introduce As-Needed Decomposition and Planning for complex Tasks (ADaPT) ADaPT explicitly plans and decomposes complex sub-tasks as-needed, when the Large Language Models is unable to execute them. Our results demonstrate that ADaPT substantially outperforms established strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T17:59:15Z)
• Tree-Planner: Efficient Close-loop Task Planning with Large Language Models [63.06270302774049]
  Tree-Planner reframes task planning with Large Language Models into three distinct phases. Tree-Planner achieves state-of-the-art performance while maintaining high efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T17:59:50Z)
• Skip-Plan: Procedure Planning in Instructional Videos via Condensed Action Space Learning [85.84504287685884]
  Skip-Plan is a condensed action space learning method for procedure planning in instructional videos. By skipping uncertain nodes and edges in action chains, we transfer long and complex sequence functions into short but reliable ones. Our model explores all sorts of reliable sub-relations within an action sequence in the condensed action space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T08:02:33Z)
• AdaPlanner: Adaptive Planning from Feedback with Language Models [56.367020818139665]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated the potential in acting as autonomous agents for sequential decision-making tasks. We propose a closed-loop approach, AdaPlanner, which allows the LLM agent to refine its self-generated plan adaptively in response to environmental feedback. To mitigate hallucination, we develop a code-style LLM prompt structure that facilitates plan generation across a variety of tasks, environments, and agent capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T05:52:27Z)
• A Framework for Neurosymbolic Robot Action Planning using Large Language Models [3.0501524254444767]
  We present a framework aimed at bridging the gap between symbolic task planning and machine learning approaches. The rationale is training Large Language Models (LLMs) into a neurosymbolic task planner compatible with the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) Preliminary results in selected domains show that our method can: (i) solve 95.5% of problems in a test data set of 1,000 samples; (ii) produce plans up to 13.5% shorter than a traditional symbolic planner; (iii) reduce average overall waiting times for a plan availability by up to 61.4%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T11:54:22Z)
• Fairness in Multi-Agent Planning [2.7184224088243356]
  This paper adapts well-known fairness schemes to Multi-Agent Planning (MAP) It introduces two novel approaches to generate cost-aware fair plans. Empirical results in several standard MAP benchmarks show that these approaches outperform different baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T13:58:46Z)
• Planning to Practice: Efficient Online Fine-Tuning by Composing Goals in Latent Space [76.46113138484947]
  General-purpose robots require diverse repertoires of behaviors to complete challenging tasks in real-world unstructured environments. To address this issue, goal-conditioned reinforcement learning aims to acquire policies that can reach goals for a wide range of tasks on command. We propose Planning to Practice, a method that makes it practical to train goal-conditioned policies for long-horizon tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-17T06:58:17Z)
• Dynamic Multi-Robot Task Allocation under Uncertainty and Temporal Constraints [52.58352707495122]
  We present a multi-robot allocation algorithm that decouples the key computational challenges of sequential decision-making under uncertainty and multi-agent coordination. We validate our results over a wide range of simulations on two distinct domains: multi-arm conveyor belt pick-and-place and multi-drone delivery dispatch in a city.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T01:10:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.