Security Risks Concerns of Generative AI in the IoT

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00139v1
• Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 20:28:30 GMT
• Title: Security Risks Concerns of Generative AI in the IoT
• Authors: Honghui Xu, Yingshu Li, Olusesi Balogun, Shaoen Wu, Yue Wang, Zhipeng Cai,
• Abstract summary: In an era where the Internet of Things (IoT) intersects increasingly with generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), this article scrutinizes the emergent security risks inherent in this integration. We explore how generative AI drives innovation in IoT and we analyze the potential for data breaches when using generative AI and the misuse of generative AI technologies in IoT ecosystems.
• Score: 9.35121449708677
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: In an era where the Internet of Things (IoT) intersects increasingly with generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), this article scrutinizes the emergent security risks inherent in this integration. We explore how generative AI drives innovation in IoT and we analyze the potential for data breaches when using generative AI and the misuse of generative AI technologies in IoT ecosystems. These risks not only threaten the privacy and efficiency of IoT systems but also pose broader implications for trust and safety in AI-driven environments. The discussion in this article extends to strategic approaches for mitigating these risks, including the development of robust security protocols, the multi-layered security approaches, and the adoption of AI technological solutions. Through a comprehensive analysis, this article aims to shed light on the critical balance between embracing AI advancements and ensuring stringent security in IoT, providing insights into the future direction of these intertwined technologies.

Related papers

• AI Horizon Scanning -- White Paper p3395, IEEE-SA. Part III: Technology Watch: a selection of key developments, emerging technologies, and industry trends in Artificial Intelligence [0.3277163122167434]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies are in a phase of unprecedented rapid development following the landmark release of Chat-GPT. As the deployment of AI products rises geometrically, considerable attention is being given to the threats and opportunities that AI technologies offer. This manuscript is the third of a series of White Papers informing the development of IEEE-SA's p3995 it Standard for the Implementation of Safeguards, Controls, and Preventive Techniques for Artificial Intelligence Models'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T19:04:42Z)
• Generative AI Agents in Autonomous Machines: A Safety Perspective [9.02400798202199]
  generative AI agents provide unparalleled capabilities, but they also have unique safety concerns. This work investigates the evolving safety requirements when generative models are integrated as agents into physical autonomous machines. We recommend the development and implementation of comprehensive safety scorecards for the use of generative AI technologies in autonomous machines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T20:07:08Z)
• Trustworthy, Responsible, and Safe AI: A Comprehensive Architectural Framework for AI Safety with Challenges and Mitigations [14.150792596344674]
  AI Safety is an emerging area of critical importance to the safe adoption and deployment of AI systems. Our goal is to promote advancement in AI safety research, and ultimately enhance people's trust in digital transformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T09:33:48Z)
• EAIRiskBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [47.69642609574771]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EAIRiskBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems [88.80306881112313]
  We will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI. The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees. We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:38:32Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Trust-based Approaches Towards Enhancing IoT Security: A Systematic Literature Review [3.0969632359049473]
  This research paper presents a systematic literature review on the Trust-based cybersecurity security approaches for IoT. We highlighted the common trust-based mitigation techniques in existence for dealing with these threats. Several open issues were highlighted, and future research directions presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T12:21:35Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) in the Internet of Things (IoT): Opportunities and Challenges [55.82853124625841]
  Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) possesses the capacity to comprehend, learn, and execute tasks with human cognitive abilities. This research embarks on an exploration of the opportunities and challenges towards achieving AGI in the context of the Internet of Things. The application spectrum for AGI-infused IoT is broad, encompassing domains ranging from smart grids, residential environments, manufacturing, and transportation to environmental monitoring, agriculture, healthcare, and education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T05:43:36Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• Machine and Deep Learning for IoT Security and Privacy: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions [0.0]
  The integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) connects a number of intelligent devices with a minimum of human interference. Current security approaches can also be improved to protect the IoT environment effectively. Deep learning (DL)/ machine learning (ML) methods are essential to turn IoT systems protection from simply enabling safe contact between IoT systems to intelligence systems in security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T19:02:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.