Security Risks Concerns of Generative AI in the IoT
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00139v1
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 20:28:30 GMT
- Title: Security Risks Concerns of Generative AI in the IoT
- Authors: Honghui Xu, Yingshu Li, Olusesi Balogun, Shaoen Wu, Yue Wang, Zhipeng Cai,
- Abstract summary: In an era where the Internet of Things (IoT) intersects increasingly with generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), this article scrutinizes the emergent security risks inherent in this integration.
We explore how generative AI drives innovation in IoT and we analyze the potential for data breaches when using generative AI and the misuse of generative AI technologies in IoT ecosystems.
- Score: 9.35121449708677
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: In an era where the Internet of Things (IoT) intersects increasingly with generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), this article scrutinizes the emergent security risks inherent in this integration. We explore how generative AI drives innovation in IoT and we analyze the potential for data breaches when using generative AI and the misuse of generative AI technologies in IoT ecosystems. These risks not only threaten the privacy and efficiency of IoT systems but also pose broader implications for trust and safety in AI-driven environments. The discussion in this article extends to strategic approaches for mitigating these risks, including the development of robust security protocols, the multi-layered security approaches, and the adoption of AI technological solutions. Through a comprehensive analysis, this article aims to shed light on the critical balance between embracing AI advancements and ensuring stringent security in IoT, providing insights into the future direction of these intertwined technologies.
Related papers
- Computational Safety for Generative AI: A Signal Processing Perspective [65.268245109828]
computational safety is a mathematical framework that enables the quantitative assessment, formulation, and study of safety challenges in GenAI.
We show how sensitivity analysis and loss landscape analysis can be used to detect malicious prompts with jailbreak attempts.
We discuss key open research challenges, opportunities, and the essential role of signal processing in computational AI safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T02:26:50Z) - Generative AI for Internet of Things Security: Challenges and Opportunities [6.291311608742319]
This work delves into an examination of the state-of-the-art literature and practical applications on how GenAI could improve and be applied in the security landscape of IoT.
Our investigation aims to map the current state of GenAI implementation within IoT security, exploring their potential to fortify security measures further.
It explains the prevailing challenges within IoT security, discusses the effectiveness of GenAI in addressing these issues, and identifies significant research gaps through MITRE Mitigations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-13T01:55:43Z) - Securing the AI Frontier: Urgent Ethical and Regulatory Imperatives for AI-Driven Cybersecurity [0.0]
This paper critically examines the evolving ethical and regulatory challenges posed by the integration of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity.
We trace the historical development of AI regulation, highlighting major milestones from theoretical discussions in the 1940s to the implementation of recent global frameworks such as the European Union AI Act.
Ethical concerns such as bias, transparency, accountability, privacy, and human oversight are explored in depth, along with their implications for AI-driven cybersecurity systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-15T18:17:37Z) - Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks.
In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z) - Generative AI Agents in Autonomous Machines: A Safety Perspective [9.02400798202199]
generative AI agents provide unparalleled capabilities, but they also have unique safety concerns.
This work investigates the evolving safety requirements when generative models are integrated as agents into physical autonomous machines.
We recommend the development and implementation of comprehensive safety scorecards for the use of generative AI technologies in autonomous machines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-20T20:07:08Z) - Trustworthy, Responsible, and Safe AI: A Comprehensive Architectural Framework for AI Safety with Challenges and Mitigations [15.946242944119385]
AI Safety is an emerging area of critical importance to the safe adoption and deployment of AI systems.
Our goal is to promote advancement in AI safety research, and ultimately enhance people's trust in digital transformation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-23T09:33:48Z) - EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction.
Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results.
However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges.
This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z) - Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems [88.80306881112313]
We will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI.
The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees.
We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T17:38:32Z) - Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems.
There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them.
Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z) - Towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) in the Internet of Things
(IoT): Opportunities and Challenges [55.82853124625841]
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) possesses the capacity to comprehend, learn, and execute tasks with human cognitive abilities.
This research embarks on an exploration of the opportunities and challenges towards achieving AGI in the context of the Internet of Things.
The application spectrum for AGI-infused IoT is broad, encompassing domains ranging from smart grids, residential environments, manufacturing, and transportation to environmental monitoring, agriculture, healthcare, and education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-14T05:43:36Z) - Machine and Deep Learning for IoT Security and Privacy: Applications,
Challenges, and Future Directions [0.0]
The integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) connects a number of intelligent devices with a minimum of human interference.
Current security approaches can also be improved to protect the IoT environment effectively.
Deep learning (DL)/ machine learning (ML) methods are essential to turn IoT systems protection from simply enabling safe contact between IoT systems to intelligence systems in security.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-24T19:02:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.