Assisting humans in complex comparisons: automated information comparison at scale
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04351v1
- Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:44:54 GMT
- Title: Assisting humans in complex comparisons: automated information comparison at scale
- Authors: Truman Yuen, Graham A. Watt, Yuri Lawryshyn,
- Abstract summary: Abstractive Summarization & Criteria-driven Comparison (ASC$2$End) system developed.
Our system employs Semantic Text Similarity comparisons for generating evidence-supported analyses.
Prompts were designed using zero-shot strategies to contextualize information for improved model reasoning.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Generative Large Language Models enable efficient analytics across knowledge domains, rivalling human experts in information comparisons. However, the applications of LLMs for information comparisons face scalability challenges due to the difficulties in maintaining information across large contexts and overcoming model token limitations. To address these challenges, we developed the novel Abstractive Summarization \& Criteria-driven Comparison Endpoint (ASC$^2$End) system to automate information comparison at scale. Our system employs Semantic Text Similarity comparisons for generating evidence-supported analyses. We utilize proven data-handling strategies such as abstractive summarization and retrieval augmented generation to overcome token limitations and retain relevant information during model inference. Prompts were designed using zero-shot strategies to contextualize information for improved model reasoning. We evaluated abstractive summarization using ROUGE scoring and assessed the generated comparison quality using survey responses. Models evaluated on the ASC$^2$End system show desirable results providing insights on the expected performance of the system. ASC$^2$End is a novel system and tool that enables accurate, automated information comparison at scale across knowledge domains, overcoming limitations in context length and retrieval.
Related papers
- MDSF: Context-Aware Multi-Dimensional Data Storytelling Framework based on Large language Model [1.33134751838052]
This paper introduces the Multidimensional Data Storytelling Framework (MDSF) based on large language models for automated insight generation and context-aware storytelling.
The framework incorporates advanced preprocessing techniques, augmented analysis algorithms, and a unique scoring mechanism to identify and prioritize actionable insights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-02T02:35:38Z) - A Statistical Framework for Ranking LLM-Based Chatbots [57.59268154690763]
We propose a statistical framework that incorporates key advancements to address specific challenges in pairwise comparison analysis.
First, we introduce a factored tie model that enhances the ability to handle groupings of human-judged comparisons.
Second, we extend the framework to model covariance tiers between competitors, enabling deeper insights into performance relationships.
Third, we resolve optimization challenges arising from parameter non-uniqueness by introducing novel constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-24T12:54:19Z) - Factual Dialogue Summarization via Learning from Large Language Models [35.63037083806503]
Large language model (LLM)-based automatic text summarization models generate more factually consistent summaries.
We employ zero-shot learning to extract symbolic knowledge from LLMs, generating factually consistent (positive) and inconsistent (negative) summaries.
Our approach achieves better factual consistency while maintaining coherence, fluency, and relevance, as confirmed by various automatic evaluation metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T20:03:37Z) - Long-Span Question-Answering: Automatic Question Generation and QA-System Ranking via Side-by-Side Evaluation [65.16137964758612]
We explore the use of long-context capabilities in large language models to create synthetic reading comprehension data from entire books.
Our objective is to test the capabilities of LLMs to analyze, understand, and reason over problems that require a detailed comprehension of long spans of text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T20:15:10Z) - CELA: Cost-Efficient Language Model Alignment for CTR Prediction [70.65910069412944]
Click-Through Rate (CTR) prediction holds a paramount position in recommender systems.
Recent efforts have sought to mitigate these challenges by integrating Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs)
We propose textbfCost-textbfEfficient textbfLanguage Model textbfAlignment (textbfCELA) for CTR prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T07:43:25Z) - QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement.
QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights.
We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z) - An Empirical Investigation of Commonsense Self-Supervision with
Knowledge Graphs [67.23285413610243]
Self-supervision based on the information extracted from large knowledge graphs has been shown to improve the generalization of language models.
We study the effect of knowledge sampling strategies and sizes that can be used to generate synthetic data for adapting language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-21T19:49:04Z) - AES Systems Are Both Overstable And Oversensitive: Explaining Why And
Proposing Defenses [66.49753193098356]
We investigate the reason behind the surprising adversarial brittleness of scoring models.
Our results indicate that autoscoring models, despite getting trained as "end-to-end" models, behave like bag-of-words models.
We propose detection-based protection models that can detect oversensitivity and overstability causing samples with high accuracies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-24T03:49:38Z) - Knowledge Graph-Augmented Abstractive Summarization with Semantic-Driven
Cloze Reward [42.925345819778656]
We present ASGARD, a novel framework for Abstractive Summarization with Graph-Augmentation and semantic-driven RewarD.
We propose the use of dual encoders---a sequential document encoder and a graph-structured encoder---to maintain the global context and local characteristics of entities.
Results show that our models produce significantly higher ROUGE scores than a variant without knowledge graph as input on both New York Times and CNN/Daily Mail datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-03T18:23:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.