Analyzing the Impact of Data Selection and Fine-Tuning on Economic and Political Biases in LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08699v2
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:51:29 GMT
- Title: Analyzing the Impact of Data Selection and Fine-Tuning on Economic and Political Biases in LLMs
- Authors: Ahmed Agiza, Mohamed Mostagir, Sherief Reda,
- Abstract summary: This work investigates the impact of fine-tuning and data selection on economic and political biases in Large Language Models (LLMs)
We employ Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) techniques to align LLMs with targeted ideologies by modifying a small subset of parameters.
Our work contributes to the dialogue on the ethical application of AI, highlighting the importance of deploying AI in a manner that aligns with societal values.
- Score: 1.1704154007740835
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In an era where language models are increasingly integrated into decision-making and communication, understanding the biases within Large Language Models (LLMs) becomes imperative, especially when these models are applied in the economic and political domains. This work investigates the impact of fine-tuning and data selection on economic and political biases in LLM. We explore the methodological aspects of biasing LLMs towards specific ideologies, mindful of the biases that arise from their extensive training on diverse datasets. Our approach, distinct from earlier efforts that either focus on smaller models or entail resource-intensive pre-training, employs Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) techniques. These techniques allow for the alignment of LLMs with targeted ideologies by modifying a small subset of parameters. We introduce a systematic method for dataset selection, annotation, and instruction tuning, and we assess its effectiveness through both quantitative and qualitative evaluations. Our work analyzes the potential of embedding specific biases into LLMs and contributes to the dialogue on the ethical application of AI, highlighting the importance of deploying AI in a manner that aligns with societal values.
Related papers
- Examining the Influence of Political Bias on Large Language Model Performance in Stance Classification [5.8229466650067065]
We investigate whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit a tendency to more accurately classify politically-charged stances.
Our findings reveal a statistically significant difference in the performance of LLMs across various politically oriented stance classification tasks.
LLMs have poorer stance classification accuracy when there is greater ambiguity in the target the statement is directed towards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-25T01:11:38Z) - CEB: Compositional Evaluation Benchmark for Fairness in Large Language Models [58.57987316300529]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed to handle various natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
To evaluate the biases exhibited by LLMs, researchers have recently proposed a variety of datasets.
We propose CEB, a Compositional Evaluation Benchmark that covers different types of bias across different social groups and tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T16:31:37Z) - Interpreting Bias in Large Language Models: A Feature-Based Approach [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable performance across various natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
This paper investigates the propagation of biases within LLMs through a novel feature-based analytical approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T07:28:15Z) - A Survey on Human Preference Learning for Large Language Models [81.41868485811625]
The recent surge of versatile large language models (LLMs) largely depends on aligning increasingly capable foundation models with human intentions by preference learning.
This survey covers the sources and formats of preference feedback, the modeling and usage of preference signals, as well as the evaluation of the aligned LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T03:52:51Z) - Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Data [102.16105233826917]
Learning from preference labels plays a crucial role in fine-tuning large language models.
There are several distinct approaches for preference fine-tuning, including supervised learning, on-policy reinforcement learning (RL), and contrastive learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-22T17:20:18Z) - Characterizing Truthfulness in Large Language Model Generations with
Local Intrinsic Dimension [63.330262740414646]
We study how to characterize and predict the truthfulness of texts generated from large language models (LLMs)
We suggest investigating internal activations and quantifying LLM's truthfulness using the local intrinsic dimension (LID) of model activations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T04:56:21Z) - From Understanding to Utilization: A Survey on Explainability for Large
Language Models [27.295767173801426]
This survey underscores the imperative for increased explainability in Large Language Models (LLMs)
Our focus is primarily on pre-trained Transformer-based LLMs, which pose distinctive interpretability challenges due to their scale and complexity.
When considering the utilization of explainability, we explore several compelling methods that concentrate on model editing, control generation, and model enhancement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-23T16:09:53Z) - Exploring the Jungle of Bias: Political Bias Attribution in Language Models via Dependency Analysis [86.49858739347412]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked intense debate regarding the prevalence of bias in these models and its mitigation.
We propose a prompt-based method for the extraction of confounding and mediating attributes which contribute to the decision process.
We find that the observed disparate treatment can at least in part be attributed to confounding and mitigating attributes and model misalignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T00:02:25Z) - Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey [73.87651986156006]
We present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for large language models (LLMs)
We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing.
We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive, two for bias evaluation, and one for mitigation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-02T00:32:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.