Surveying Attitudinal Alignment Between Large Language Models Vs. Humans Towards 17 Sustainable Development Goals

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13885v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:12:52 GMT
• Title: Surveying Attitudinal Alignment Between Large Language Models Vs. Humans Towards 17 Sustainable Development Goals
• Authors: Qingyang Wu, Ying Xu, Tingsong Xiao, Yunze Xiao, Yitong Li, Tianyang Wang, Yichi Zhang, Shanghai Zhong, Yuwei Zhang, Wei Lu, Yifan Yang,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as potent tools for advancing the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. This study conducts a comprehensive review and analysis of the existing literature on the attitudes of LLMs towards the 17 SDGs. We examine the potential disparities, primarily focusing on aspects such as understanding and emotions, cultural and regional differences, task objective variations, and factors considered in the decision-making process.
• Score: 28.98314322374492
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as potent tools for advancing the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, the attitudinal disparities between LLMs and humans towards these goals can pose significant challenges. This study conducts a comprehensive review and analysis of the existing literature on the attitudes of LLMs towards the 17 SDGs, emphasizing the comparison between their attitudes and support for each goal and those of humans. We examine the potential disparities, primarily focusing on aspects such as understanding and emotions, cultural and regional differences, task objective variations, and factors considered in the decision-making process. These disparities arise from the underrepresentation and imbalance in LLM training data, historical biases, quality issues, lack of contextual understanding, and skewed ethical values reflected. The study also investigates the risks and harms that may arise from neglecting the attitudes of LLMs towards the SDGs, including the exacerbation of social inequalities, racial discrimination, environmental destruction, and resource wastage. To address these challenges, we propose strategies and recommendations to guide and regulate the application of LLMs, ensuring their alignment with the principles and goals of the SDGs, and therefore creating a more just, inclusive, and sustainable future.

Related papers

• Large Language Models Reflect the Ideology of their Creators [73.25935570218375]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on vast amounts of data to generate natural language. We uncover notable diversity in the ideological stance exhibited across different LLMs and languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T04:02:30Z)
• Hate Personified: Investigating the role of LLMs in content moderation [64.26243779985393]
  For subjective tasks such as hate detection, where people perceive hate differently, the Large Language Model's (LLM) ability to represent diverse groups is unclear. By including additional context in prompts, we analyze LLM's sensitivity to geographical priming, persona attributes, and numerical information to assess how well the needs of various groups are reflected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T16:43:17Z)
• Decoding Large-Language Models: A Systematic Overview of Socio-Technical Impacts, Constraints, and Emerging Questions [1.1970409518725493]
  The article highlights the application areas that could have a positive impact on society along with the ethical considerations. It includes responsible development considerations, algorithmic improvements, ethical challenges, and societal implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T14:36:30Z)
• Deconstructing The Ethics of Large Language Models from Long-standing Issues to New-emerging Dilemmas: A Survey [27.689403365365685]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unparalleled success across diverse language modeling tasks in recent years. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of ethical challenges associated with LLMs, from longstanding issues such as copyright infringement to emerging problems like truthfulness and social norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-08T07:55:01Z)
• MARS: Benchmarking the Metaphysical Reasoning Abilities of Language Models with a Multi-task Evaluation Dataset [50.36095192314595]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) function as conscious agents with generalizable reasoning capabilities. This ability remains underexplored due to the complexity of modeling infinite possible changes in an event. We introduce the first-ever benchmark, MARS, comprising three tasks corresponding to each step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T08:35:04Z)
• LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.89014602596673]
  Strategic reasoning requires understanding and predicting adversary actions in multi-agent settings while adjusting strategies accordingly. We explore the scopes, applications, methodologies, and evaluation metrics related to strategic reasoning with Large Language Models. It underscores the importance of strategic reasoning as a critical cognitive capability and offers insights into future research directions and potential improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z)
• Comparing Rationality Between Large Language Models and Humans: Insights and Open Questions [6.201550639431176]
  This paper focuses on the burgeoning prominence of large language models (LLMs) We underscore the pivotal role of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) in augmenting LLMs' rationality and decision-making prowess.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T18:36:04Z)
• A Moral Imperative: The Need for Continual Superalignment of Large Language Models [1.0499611180329806]
  Superalignment is a theoretical framework that aspires to ensure that superintelligent AI systems act in accordance with human values and goals. This paper examines the challenges associated with achieving life-long superalignment in AI systems, particularly large language models (LLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T05:44:50Z)
• Inadequacies of Large Language Model Benchmarks in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence [5.147767778946168]
  We critically assess 23 state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) benchmarks. Our research uncovered significant limitations, including biases, difficulties in measuring genuine reasoning, adaptability, implementation inconsistencies, prompt engineering complexity, diversity, and the overlooking of cultural and ideological norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T11:08:10Z)
• Measuring and Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [61.28463542324576]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have recently demonstrated strong efficacy as visual assistants that can generate human-like outputs. We evaluate existing state-of-the-art VLMs and find that even the best-performing model is unable to demonstrate strong visual reasoning capabilities and consistency. We propose a two-stage training framework aimed at improving both the reasoning performance and consistency of VLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T17:49:44Z)
• A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models [87.60417393701331]
  Large language models (LLMs) are gaining increasing popularity in both academia and industry. This paper focuses on three key dimensions: what to evaluate, where to evaluate, and how to evaluate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T16:28:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.