On the applicability of Kolmogorov's theory of probability to the description of quantum phenomena. Part I

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05710v3
• Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 19:35:41 GMT
• Title: On the applicability of Kolmogorov's theory of probability to the description of quantum phenomena. Part I
• Authors: Maik Reddiger,
• Abstract summary: I show that it is possible to construct a mathematically rigorous theory based on Kolmogorov's axioms and physically natural random variables. The approach can in principle be adapted to other classes of quantum-mechanical models.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: It is a common view that von Neumann laid the foundations of a "quantum probability theory" with his axiomatization of quantum mechanics (QM). As such, it is regarded a generalization of the "classical probability theory" due to Kolmogorov. Outside of quantum physics, however, Kolmogorov's axioms enjoy universal applicability. This raises the question of whether quantum physics indeed requires such a generalization of our conception of probability or if von Neumann's axiomatization of QM was contingent on the absence of a general theory of probability in the 1920s. In this work I argue in favor of the latter position. In particular, I show that for non-relativistic $N$-body quantum systems subject to a time-independent scalar potential, it is possible to construct a mathematically rigorous theory based on Kolmogorov's axioms and physically natural random variables, which reproduces central predictions of QM. The respective theories are distinct, so that an empirical comparison may be possible. Moreover, the approach can in principle be adapted to other classes of quantum-mechanical models. Part II of this series will address the projection postulate and the question of measurement in this approach.

Related papers

• The composition rule for quantum systems is not the only possible one [0.0]
  We argue that the composition postulate deserves to be experimentally scrutinised independently of the other features of quantum theory. We formulate a family of operational theories that are solely distinguished from standard quantum theory by their system-composition rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-24T19:31:13Z)
• A refinement of the argument of local realism versus quantum mechanics by algorithmic randomness [0.0]
  In quantum mechanics, the notion of probability plays a crucial role. In modern mathematics, probability theory means nothing other than measure theory. We present a refinement of the Born rule, called the principle of typicality, for specifying the property of results of measurements in an operational way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T18:22:42Z)
• Quantum Theory Needs (And Probably Has) Real Reduction [0.0]
  It appears that for quantum theory to be viable in a realist sense, it must possess genuine, physical non-unitarity. Penrose's theory of gravitation-induced collapse and the Transactional Interpretation are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T21:25:23Z)
• Advantages of quantum mechanics in the estimation theory [0.0]
  In quantum theory, the situation with operators is different due to its non-commutativity nature. We formulate, with complete generality, the quantum estimation theory for Gaussian states in terms of their first and second moments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-13T18:03:27Z)
• Correspondence Between the Energy Equipartition Theorem in Classical Mechanics and its Phase-Space Formulation in Quantum Mechanics [62.997667081978825]
  In quantum mechanics, the energy per degree of freedom is not equally distributed. We show that in the high-temperature regime, the classical result is recovered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T20:51:03Z)
• Why we should interpret density matrices as moment matrices: the case of (in)distinguishable particles and the emergence of classical reality [69.62715388742298]
  We introduce a formulation of quantum theory (QT) as a general probabilistic theory but expressed via quasi-expectation operators (QEOs) We will show that QT for both distinguishable and indistinguishable particles can be formulated in this way. We will show that finitely exchangeable probabilities for a classical dice are as weird as QT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T14:47:39Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Emergence of classical behavior in the early universe [68.8204255655161]
  Three notions are often assumed to be essentially equivalent, representing different facets of the same phenomenon. We analyze them in general Friedmann-Lemaitre- Robertson-Walker space-times through the lens of geometric structures on the classical phase space. The analysis shows that: (i) inflation does not play an essential role; classical behavior can emerge much more generally; (ii) the three notions are conceptually distinct; classicality can emerge in one sense but not in another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T16:38:25Z)
• Characterization of the probabilistic models that can be embedded in quantum theory [0.0]
  We show that only classical and standard quantum theory with superselection rules can arise from a physical decoherence map. Our results have significant consequences for some experimental tests of quantum theory, by clarifying how they could (or could not) falsify it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-13T18:09:39Z)
• From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
  We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover. The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.