A Reliability Theory of Compromise Decisions for Large-Scale Stochastic Programs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10414v1
• Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 19:33:00 GMT
• Title: A Reliability Theory of Compromise Decisions for Large-Scale Stochastic Programs
• Abstract summary: This paper studies the reliability of programming solutions resulting from the "compromise decision" process. We quantify the reliability of compromise decisions by estimating the expectation and variance of the "pessimistic distance" of sampled instances from the set of true optimal decisions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Stochastic programming models can lead to very large-scale optimization problems for which it may be impossible to enumerate all possible scenarios. In such cases, one adopts a sampling-based solution methodology in which case the reliability of the resulting decisions may be suspect. For such instances, it is advisable to adopt methodologies that promote variance reduction. One such approach goes under a framework known as "compromise decision", which requires multiple replications of the solution procedure. This paper studies the reliability of stochastic programming solutions resulting from the "compromise decision" process. This process is characterized by minimizing an aggregation of objective function approximations across replications, presumably conducted in parallel. We refer to the post-parallel-processing problem as the problem of "compromise decision". We quantify the reliability of compromise decisions by estimating the expectation and variance of the "pessimistic distance" of sampled instances from the set of true optimal decisions. Such pessimistic distance is defined as an estimate of the largest possible distance of the solution of the sampled instance from the "true" optimal solution set. The Rademacher average of instances is used to bound the sample complexity of the compromise decision.

Related papers

• A Principled Approach to Randomized Selection under Uncertainty: Applications to Peer Review and Grant Funding [68.43987626137512]
  We propose a principled framework for randomized decision-making based on interval estimates of the quality of each item.<n>We introduce MERIT, an optimization-based method that maximizes the worst-case expected number of top candidates selected.<n>We prove that MERIT satisfies desirable axiomatic properties not guaranteed by existing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T19:59:30Z)
• Stochastic Optimization with Optimal Importance Sampling [49.484190237840714]
  We propose an iterative-based algorithm that jointly updates the decision and the IS distribution without requiring time-scale separation between the two. Our method achieves the lowest possible variable variance and guarantees global convergence under convexity of the objective and mild assumptions on the IS distribution family.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T16:10:18Z)
• Zeroth-Order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Problems with Decision-Dependent Distributions [8.90721241624138]
  We consider an optimization problem with uncertainty dependent on decision variables. In this problem, the gradient of the objective function cannot be obtained explicitly because the decision-dependent distribution is unknown. Several zeroth-order methods have been proposed, which obtain noisy objective values by sampling and update the iterates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-29T03:05:34Z)
• Online POMDP Planning with Anytime Deterministic Guarantees [11.157761902108692]
  Planning under uncertainty can be mathematically formalized using partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) Finding an optimal plan for POMDPs can be computationally expensive and is feasible only for small tasks. We derive a deterministic relationship between a simplified solution that is easier to obtain and the theoretically optimal one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T04:40:38Z)
• Margin theory for the scenario-based approach to robust optimization in high dimension [0.0]
  This paper deals with the scenario approach to robust optimization. This relies on a random sampling of the possibly infinite number of constraints induced by uncertainties in a problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T13:33:46Z)
• Stochastic Inexact Augmented Lagrangian Method for Nonconvex Expectation Constrained Optimization [88.0031283949404]
  Many real-world problems have complicated non functional constraints and use a large number of data points. Our proposed method outperforms an existing method with the previously best-known result.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T14:48:54Z)
• The Parametric Cost Function Approximation: A new approach for multistage stochastic programming [4.847980206213335]
  We show that a parameterized version of a deterministic optimization model can be an effective way of handling uncertainty without the complexity of either programming or dynamic programming. This approach can handle complex, high-dimensional state variables, and avoids the usual approximations associated with scenario trees or value function approximations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-01T23:25:09Z)
• Parallel Stochastic Mirror Descent for MDPs [72.75921150912556]
  We consider the problem of learning the optimal policy for infinite-horizon Markov decision processes (MDPs) Some variant of Mirror Descent is proposed for convex programming problems with Lipschitz-continuous functionals. We analyze this algorithm in a general case and obtain an estimate of the convergence rate that does not accumulate errors during the operation of the method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-27T19:28:39Z)
• Stein Variational Model Predictive Control [130.60527864489168]
  Decision making under uncertainty is critical to real-world, autonomous systems. Model Predictive Control (MPC) methods have demonstrated favorable performance in practice, but remain limited when dealing with complex distributions. We show that this framework leads to successful planning in challenging, non optimal control problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T22:36:59Z)
• Adaptive Sampling for Best Policy Identification in Markov Decision Processes [79.4957965474334]
  We investigate the problem of best-policy identification in discounted Markov Decision (MDPs) when the learner has access to a generative model. The advantages of state-of-the-art algorithms are discussed and illustrated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T15:22:24Z)
• Robust, Accurate Stochastic Optimization for Variational Inference [68.83746081733464]
  We show that common optimization methods lead to poor variational approximations if the problem is moderately large. Motivated by these findings, we develop a more robust and accurate optimization framework by viewing the underlying algorithm as producing a Markov chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T19:12:11Z)
• Bayesian preference elicitation for multiobjective combinatorial optimization [12.96855751244076]
  We introduce a new incremental preference elicitation procedure able to deal with noisy responses of a Decision Maker (DM) We assume that the preferences of the DM are represented by an aggregation function whose parameters are unknown and that the uncertainty about them is represented by a density function on the parameter space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T12:28:37Z)
• Learning with Differentiable Perturbed Optimizers [54.351317101356614]
  We propose a systematic method to transform operations into operations that are differentiable and never locally constant. Our approach relies on perturbeds, and can be used readily together with existing solvers. We show how this framework can be connected to a family of losses developed in structured prediction, and give theoretical guarantees for their use in learning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T11:11:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.