Smoke and Mirrors in Causal Downstream Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17151v3
• Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:48:17 GMT
• Title: Smoke and Mirrors in Causal Downstream Tasks
• Authors: Riccardo Cadei, Lukas Lindorfer, Sylvia Cremer, Cordelia Schmid, Francesco Locatello,
• Abstract summary: This paper looks at the causal inference task of treatment effect estimation, where the outcome of interest is recorded in high-dimensional observations. We compare 6 480 models fine-tuned from state-of-the-art visual backbones, and find that the sampling and modeling choices significantly affect the accuracy of the causal estimate. Our results suggest that future benchmarks should carefully consider real downstream scientific questions, especially causal ones.
• Score: 59.90654397037007
• License:
• Abstract: Machine Learning and AI have the potential to transform data-driven scientific discovery, enabling accurate predictions for several scientific phenomena. As many scientific questions are inherently causal, this paper looks at the causal inference task of treatment effect estimation, where the outcome of interest is recorded in high-dimensional observations in a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Despite being the simplest possible causal setting and a perfect fit for deep learning, we theoretically find that many common choices in the literature may lead to biased estimates. To test the practical impact of these considerations, we recorded ISTAnt, the first real-world benchmark for causal inference downstream tasks on high-dimensional observations as an RCT studying how garden ants (Lasius neglectus) respond to microparticles applied onto their colony members by hygienic grooming. Comparing 6 480 models fine-tuned from state-of-the-art visual backbones, we find that the sampling and modeling choices significantly affect the accuracy of the causal estimate, and that classification accuracy is not a proxy thereof. We further validated the analysis, repeating it on a synthetically generated visual data set controlling the causal model. Our results suggest that future benchmarks should carefully consider real downstream scientific questions, especially causal ones. Further, we highlight guidelines for representation learning methods to help answer causal questions in the sciences.

Related papers

• Causal Representation Learning in Temporal Data via Single-Parent Decoding [66.34294989334728]
  Scientific research often seeks to understand the causal structure underlying high-level variables in a system. Scientists typically collect low-level measurements, such as geographically distributed temperature readings. We propose a differentiable method, Causal Discovery with Single-parent Decoding, that simultaneously learns the underlying latents and a causal graph over them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T15:57:50Z)
• CAnDOIT: Causal Discovery with Observational and Interventional Data from Time-Series [4.008958683836471]
  CAnDOIT is a causal discovery method to reconstruct causal models using both observational and interventional data. The use of interventional data in the causal analysis is crucial for real-world applications, such as robotics. A Python implementation of CAnDOIT has also been developed and is publicly available on GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T13:57:08Z)
• Hypothesizing Missing Causal Variables with LLMs [55.28678224020973]
  We formulate a novel task where the input is a partial causal graph with missing variables, and the output is a hypothesis about the missing variables to complete the partial graph. We show the strong ability of LLMs to hypothesize the mediation variables between a cause and its effect. We also observe surprising results where some of the open-source models outperform the closed GPT-4 model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T10:37:44Z)
• A Causal Framework for Decomposing Spurious Variations [68.12191782657437]
  We develop tools for decomposing spurious variations in Markovian and Semi-Markovian models. We prove the first results that allow a non-parametric decomposition of spurious effects. The described approach has several applications, ranging from explainable and fair AI to questions in epidemiology and medicine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T09:40:28Z)
• Testing Causality in Scientific Modelling Software [0.26388783516590225]
  Causal Testing Framework is a framework that uses Causal Inference techniques to establish causal effects from existing data. We present three case studies covering real-world scientific models, demonstrating how the Causal Testing Framework can infer metamorphic test outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-01T10:57:54Z)
• Active Bayesian Causal Inference [72.70593653185078]
  We propose Active Bayesian Causal Inference (ABCI), a fully-Bayesian active learning framework for integrated causal discovery and reasoning. ABCI jointly infers a posterior over causal models and queries of interest. We show that our approach is more data-efficient than several baselines that only focus on learning the full causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T22:38:57Z)
• Causal discovery for observational sciences using supervised machine learning [1.6631602844999722]
  Causal inference can estimate causal effects, but unless data are collected experimentally, statistical analyses must rely on pre-specified causal models. Severalally correct methods already exist, but they generally struggle on smaller samples. Most methods focus on very sparse causal models, which may not always be a realistic representation of real-life data generating mechanisms. We propose a new causal discovery method that addresses these three shortcomings: Supervised learning discovery (SLdisco)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T16:44:00Z)
• An introduction to causal reasoning in health analytics [2.199093822766999]
  We will try to highlight some of the drawbacks that may arise in traditional machine learning and statistical approaches to analyze the observational data. We will demonstrate the applications of causal inference in tackling some common machine learning issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T20:25:56Z)
• Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
  Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects. We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders. We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.