Probability Distribution Learning and Its Application in Deep Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05666v9
• Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:13:26 GMT
• Title: Probability Distribution Learning and Its Application in Deep Learning
• Authors: Binchuan Qi,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a novel theoretical learning framework, termed probability distribution learning (PD learning) PD learning focuses on learning the underlying probability distribution, which is modeled as a random variable within the probability simplex.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: This paper introduces a novel theoretical learning framework, termed probability distribution learning (PD learning). Departing from the traditional statistical learning framework, PD learning focuses on learning the underlying probability distribution, which is modeled as a random variable within the probability simplex. In this framework, the optimization objective is the learning error, which quantifies the posterior expected discrepancy between the model's predicted distribution and the underlying true distribution, given available sample data and prior knowledge. To optimize the learning error, this paper proposes the necessary conditions for loss functions, models, and optimization algorithms, ensuring that these conditions are met in real-world machine learning scenarios. Based on these conditions, the non-convex optimization mechanism corresponding to model training can be theoretically resolved. Moreover, this paper provides model-dependent and model-independent bounds on learning error, offering new insights into the model's fitting and generalization capabilities. Furthermore, the paper applies the PD learning framework to elucidate the mechanisms by which various techniques, including random parameter initialization, over-parameterization, and dropout, influence deep model training. Finally, the paper substantiates the key conclusions of the proposed framework through experimental results.

Related papers

• Model-free Methods for Event History Analysis and Efficient Adjustment (PhD Thesis) [55.2480439325792]
  This thesis is a series of independent contributions to statistics unified by a model-free perspective. The first chapter elaborates on how a model-free perspective can be used to formulate flexible methods that leverage prediction techniques from machine learning. The second chapter studies the concept of local independence, which describes whether the evolution of one process is directly influenced by another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T19:24:09Z)
• On uniqueness in structured model learning [0.542249320079018]
  This paper addresses the problem of uniqueness in learning physical laws for systems of partial differential equations (PDEs) It considers a framework of structured model learning, where existing, approximately correct physical models are augmented with components that are learned from data. The uniqueness result shows that, in the idealized setting of full, noiseless measurements, a unique identification of the unknown model components is possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T12:56:39Z)
• A Probabilistic Perspective on Unlearning and Alignment for Large Language Models [48.96686419141881]
  We introduce the first formal probabilistic evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) Namely, we propose novel metrics with high probability guarantees concerning the output distribution of a model. Our metrics are application-independent and allow practitioners to make more reliable estimates about model capabilities before deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T15:44:23Z)
• A PAC-Bayesian Perspective on the Interpolating Information Criterion [54.548058449535155]
  We show how a PAC-Bayes bound is obtained for a general class of models, characterizing factors which influence performance in the interpolating regime. We quantify how the test error for overparameterized models achieving effectively zero training error depends on the quality of the implicit regularization imposed by e.g. the combination of model, parameter-initialization scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T01:48:08Z)
• A Mathematical Framework for Learning Probability Distributions [0.0]
  generative modeling and density estimation has become an immensely popular subject in recent years. This paper provides a mathematical framework such that all the well-known models can be derived based on simple principles. In particular, we prove that these models enjoy implicit regularization during training, so that the generalization error at early-stopping avoids the curse of dimensionality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T04:41:45Z)
• Correcting Model Bias with Sparse Implicit Processes [0.9187159782788579]
  We show that Sparse Implicit Processes (SIP) is capable of correcting model bias when the data generating mechanism differs strongly from the one implied by the model. We use synthetic datasets to show that SIP is capable of providing predictive distributions that reflect the data better than the exact predictions of the initial, but wrongly assumed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T18:00:01Z)
• MINIMALIST: Mutual INformatIon Maximization for Amortized Likelihood Inference from Sampled Trajectories [61.3299263929289]
  Simulation-based inference enables learning the parameters of a model even when its likelihood cannot be computed in practice. One class of methods uses data simulated with different parameters to infer an amortized estimator for the likelihood-to-evidence ratio. We show that this approach can be formulated in terms of mutual information between model parameters and simulated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T12:59:16Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)
• Control as Hybrid Inference [62.997667081978825]
  We present an implementation of CHI which naturally mediates the balance between iterative and amortised inference. We verify the scalability of our algorithm on a continuous control benchmark, demonstrating that it outperforms strong model-free and model-based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-11T19:44:09Z)
• Bootstrapped model learning and error correction for planning with uncertainty in model-based RL [1.370633147306388]
  A natural aim is to learn a model that reflects accurately the dynamics of the environment. This paper explores the problem of model misspecification through uncertainty-aware reinforcement learning agents. We propose a bootstrapped multi-headed neural network that learns the distribution of future states and rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T15:41:21Z)
• A comprehensive study on the prediction reliability of graph neural networks for virtual screening [0.0]
  We investigate the effects of model architectures, regularization methods, and loss functions on the prediction performance and reliability of classification results. Our result highlights that correct choice of regularization and inference methods is evidently important to achieve high success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T10:13:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.