Bounding-Box Inference for Error-Aware Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.16006v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 04:23:15 GMT
• Title: Bounding-Box Inference for Error-Aware Model-Based Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Erin J. Talvitie, Zilei Shao, Huiying Li, Jinghan Hu, Jacob Boerma, Rory Zhao, Xintong Wang,
• Abstract summary: In model-based reinforcement learning, simulated experiences are often treated as equivalent to experience from the real environment. We show that best results require distribution insensitive inference to estimate the uncertainty over model-based updates. We find that bounding-box inference can reliably support effective selective planning.
• Score: 4.185571779339683
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In model-based reinforcement learning, simulated experiences from the learned model are often treated as equivalent to experience from the real environment. However, when the model is inaccurate, it can catastrophically interfere with policy learning. Alternatively, the agent might learn about the model's accuracy and selectively use it only when it can provide reliable predictions. We empirically explore model uncertainty measures for selective planning and show that best results require distribution insensitive inference to estimate the uncertainty over model-based updates. To that end, we propose and evaluate bounding-box inference, which operates on bounding-boxes around sets of possible states and other quantities. We find that bounding-box inference can reliably support effective selective planning.

Related papers

• A Probabilistic Perspective on Unlearning and Alignment for Large Language Models [48.96686419141881]
  We introduce the first formal probabilistic evaluation framework in Large Language Models (LLMs) We derive novel metrics with high-probability guarantees concerning the output distribution of a model. Our metrics are application-independent and allow practitioners to make more reliable estimates about model capabilities before deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T15:44:23Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• Measuring and Modeling Uncertainty Degree for Monocular Depth Estimation [50.920911532133154]
  The intrinsic ill-posedness and ordinal-sensitive nature of monocular depth estimation (MDE) models pose major challenges to the estimation of uncertainty degree. We propose to model the uncertainty of MDE models from the perspective of the inherent probability distributions. By simply introducing additional training regularization terms, our model, with surprisingly simple formations and without requiring extra modules or multiple inferences, can provide uncertainty estimations with state-of-the-art reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-19T12:11:15Z)
• Plan To Predict: Learning an Uncertainty-Foreseeing Model for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [32.24146877835396]
  We propose emphPlan To Predict (P2P), a framework that treats the model rollout process as a sequential decision making problem. We show that P2P achieves state-of-the-art performance on several challenging benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-20T10:17:22Z)
• Post-hoc Uncertainty Learning using a Dirichlet Meta-Model [28.522673618527417]
  We propose a novel Bayesian meta-model to augment pre-trained models with better uncertainty quantification abilities. Our proposed method requires no additional training data and is flexible enough to quantify different uncertainties. We demonstrate our proposed meta-model approach's flexibility and superior empirical performance on these applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T17:34:11Z)
• The Implicit Delta Method [61.36121543728134]
  In this paper, we propose an alternative, the implicit delta method, which works by infinitesimally regularizing the training loss of uncertainty. We show that the change in the evaluation due to regularization is consistent for the variance of the evaluation estimator, even when the infinitesimal change is approximated by a finite difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T19:34:17Z)
• Monitoring Model Deterioration with Explainable Uncertainty Estimation via Non-parametric Bootstrap [0.0]
  Monitoring machine learning models once they are deployed is challenging. It is even more challenging to decide when to retrain models in real-case scenarios when labeled data is beyond reach. In this work, we use non-parametric bootstrapped uncertainty estimates and SHAP values to provide explainable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-27T17:23:04Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)
• Control as Hybrid Inference [62.997667081978825]
  We present an implementation of CHI which naturally mediates the balance between iterative and amortised inference. We verify the scalability of our algorithm on a continuous control benchmark, demonstrating that it outperforms strong model-free and model-based baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-11T19:44:09Z)
• Selective Dyna-style Planning Under Limited Model Capacity [26.63876180969654]
  In model-based reinforcement learning, planning with an imperfect model of the environment has the potential to harm learning progress. In this paper, we investigate the idea of using an imperfect model selectively. The agent should plan in parts of the state space where the model would be helpful but refrain from using the model where it would be harmful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-05T18:51:50Z)
• Bootstrapped model learning and error correction for planning with uncertainty in model-based RL [1.370633147306388]
  A natural aim is to learn a model that reflects accurately the dynamics of the environment. This paper explores the problem of model misspecification through uncertainty-aware reinforcement learning agents. We propose a bootstrapped multi-headed neural network that learns the distribution of future states and rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T15:41:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.