AI Tool Use and Adoption in Software Development by Individuals and Organizations: A Grounded Theory Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17325v1
• Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 07:18:56 GMT
• Title: AI Tool Use and Adoption in Software Development by Individuals and Organizations: A Grounded Theory Study
• Authors: Ze Shi Li, Nowshin Nawar Arony, Ahmed Musa Awon, Daniela Damian, Bowen Xu,
• Abstract summary: We conducted a mixed methods study involving interviews with 26 industry practitioners and 395 survey respondents. We identified 2 individual motives, 4 individual challenges, 3 organizational motives, and 3 organizational challenges, and 3 interleaved relationships. The 3 interleaved relationships act in a push-pull manner where motives pull practitioners to increase the use of AI tools and challenges push practitioners away from using AI tools.
• Score: 6.722524226580543
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI assistance tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini have dramatically impacted the nature of software development in recent years. Numerous studies have studied the positive benefits that practitioners have achieved from using these tools in their work. While there is a growing body of knowledge regarding the usability aspects of leveraging AI tools, we still lack concrete details on the issues that organizations and practitioners need to consider should they want to explore increasing adoption or use of AI tools. In this study, we conducted a mixed methods study involving interviews with 26 industry practitioners and 395 survey respondents. We found that there are several motives and challenges that impact individuals and organizations and developed a theory of AI Tool Adoption. For example, we found creating a culture of sharing of AI best practices and tips as a key motive for practitioners' adopting and using AI tools. In total, we identified 2 individual motives, 4 individual challenges, 3 organizational motives, and 3 organizational challenges, and 3 interleaved relationships. The 3 interleaved relationships act in a push-pull manner where motives pull practitioners to increase the use of AI tools and challenges push practitioners away from using AI tools.

Related papers

• The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants [53.89899371095332]
  This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants. We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural language interfaces, whose function is to plan and execute sequences of actions on behalf of a user. We consider the deployment of advanced assistants at a societal scale, focusing on cooperation, equity and access, misinformation, economic impact, the environment and how best to evaluate advanced AI assistants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T23:18:46Z)
• Higher education assessment practice in the era of generative AI tools [0.37282630026096586]
  This study experimented using three assessment instruments from data science, data analytics, and construction management disciplines. Our findings revealed that GenAI tools exhibit subject knowledge, problem-solving, analytical, critical thinking, and presentation skills. Based on our findings, we made recommendations on how AI tools can be utilised for teaching and learning in HE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T10:43:50Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  Particip-AI is a framework to gather current and future AI use cases and their harms and benefits from non-expert public. We gather responses from 295 demographically diverse participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• Beyond Recommender: An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Different AI Roles in AI-Assisted Decision Making [48.179458030691286]
  We examine three AI roles: Recommender, Analyzer, and Devil's Advocate. Our results show each role's distinct strengths and limitations in task performance, reliance appropriateness, and user experience. These insights offer valuable implications for designing AI assistants with adaptive functional roles according to different situations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T07:32:28Z)
• Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Tooling [1.841662059101602]
  Audits are critical mechanisms for identifying the risks and limitations of deployed artificial intelligence (AI) systems. We map the current ecosystem of available AI audit tools. We conclude that resources are lacking to adequately support the full scope of needs for many AI audit practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T19:52:54Z)
• AI for IT Operations (AIOps) on Cloud Platforms: Reviews, Opportunities and Challenges [60.56413461109281]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) aims to combine the power of AI with the big data generated by IT Operations processes. We discuss in depth the key types of data emitted by IT Operations activities, the scale and challenges in analyzing them, and where they can be helpful. We categorize the key AIOps tasks as - incident detection, failure prediction, root cause analysis and automated actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T15:38:12Z)
• A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and Challenges [23.467373994306524]
  In practice, developers do not accept AI programming assistants' initial suggestions at a high frequency. To understand developers' practices while using these tools, we administered a survey to a large population of developers. We found that developers are most motivated to use AI programming assistants because they help developers reduce key-strokes, finish programming tasks quickly, and recall syntax. We also found the most important reasons why developers do not use these tools are because these tools do not output code that addresses certain functional or non-functional requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T03:21:53Z)
• Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studies [22.214709837295906]
  There is growing interest in the research community to augment human decision making with AI assistance. The emerging field of human-AI decision making must embrace empirical approaches to form a foundational understanding of how humans interact and work with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T19:00:02Z)
• AI Explainability 360: Impact and Design [120.95633114160688]
  In 2019, we created AI Explainability 360 (Arya et al. 2020), an open source software toolkit featuring ten diverse and state-of-the-art explainability methods. This paper examines the impact of the toolkit with several case studies, statistics, and community feedback. The paper also describes the flexible design of the toolkit, examples of its use, and the significant educational material and documentation available to its users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-24T19:17:09Z)
• Measuring Ethics in AI with AI: A Methodology and Dataset Construction [1.6861004263551447]
  We propose to use such newfound capabilities of AI technologies to augment our AI measuring capabilities. We do so by training a model to classify publications related to ethical issues and concerns. We highlight the implications of AI metrics, in particular their contribution towards developing trustful and fair AI-based tools and technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-26T00:26:12Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.