Metareasoning in uncertain environments: a meta-BAMDP framework
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01253v2
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 15:11:31 GMT
- Title: Metareasoning in uncertain environments: a meta-BAMDP framework
- Authors: Prakhar Godara, Tilman Diego Aléman, Angela J. Yu,
- Abstract summary: Finding the right $P$ can itself be framed as an optimization problem over the space of reasoning processes $P$.
This paper proposes a meta Bayes-Adaptive MDP framework to handle metareasoning in environments with unknown reward/transition distributions.
- Score: 1.0923877073891441
- License:
- Abstract: \textit{Reasoning} may be viewed as an algorithm $P$ that makes a choice of an action $a^* \in \mathcal{A}$, aiming to optimize some outcome. However, executing $P$ itself bears costs (time, energy, limited capacity, etc.) and needs to be considered alongside explicit utility obtained by making the choice in the underlying decision problem. Finding the right $P$ can itself be framed as an optimization problem over the space of reasoning processes $P$, generally referred to as \textit{metareasoning}. Conventionally, human metareasoning models assume that the agent knows the transition and reward distributions of the underlying MDP. This paper generalizes such models by proposing a meta Bayes-Adaptive MDP (meta-BAMDP) framework to handle metareasoning in environments with unknown reward/transition distributions, which encompasses a far larger and more realistic set of planning problems that humans and AI systems face. As a first step, we apply the framework to Bernoulli bandit tasks. Owing to the meta problem's complexity, our solutions are necessarily approximate. However, we introduce two novel theorems that significantly enhance the tractability of the problem, enabling stronger approximations that are robust within a range of assumptions grounded in realistic human decision-making scenarios. These results offer a resource-rational perspective and a normative framework for understanding human exploration under cognitive constraints, as well as providing experimentally testable predictions about human behavior in Bernoulli Bandit tasks.
Related papers
- Pareto Optimal Algorithmic Recourse in Multi-cost Function [0.44938884406455726]
algorithmic recourse aims to identify minimal-cost actions to alter an individual features, thereby obtaining a desired outcome.
Most current recourse mechanisms use gradient-based methods that assume cost functions are differentiable, often not applicable in real-world scenarios.
This work proposes an algorithmic recourse framework that handles nondifferentiable and discrete multi-cost functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-11T03:16:08Z) - Sample-efficient Learning of Infinite-horizon Average-reward MDPs with General Function Approximation [53.17668583030862]
We study infinite-horizon average-reward Markov decision processes (AMDPs) in the context of general function approximation.
We propose a novel algorithmic framework named Local-fitted Optimization with OPtimism (LOOP)
We show that LOOP achieves a sublinear $tildemathcalO(mathrmpoly(d, mathrmsp(V*)) sqrtTbeta )$ regret, where $d$ and $beta$ correspond to AGEC and log-covering number of the hypothesis class respectively
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-19T06:24:22Z) - Towards Unified Alignment Between Agents, Humans, and Environment [24.731978646069]
We introduce the principles of $mathbfUA2$, which advocate for the simultaneous alignment of agents with human intentions, environmental dynamics, and self-constraints.
We conduct proof-of-concept studies by introducing realistic features to WebShop, including user profiles to demonstrate intentions, personalized reranking for complex environmental dynamics, and runtime cost statistics to reflect self-constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T16:14:22Z) - Bayesian Learning of Optimal Policies in Markov Decision Processes with Countably Infinite State-Space [0.0]
We study the problem of optimal control of a family of discrete-time countable state-space Markov Decision Processes.
We propose an algorithm based on Thompson sampling with dynamically-sized episodes.
We show that our algorithm can be applied to develop approximately optimal control algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-05T03:57:16Z) - Efficient Policy Iteration for Robust Markov Decision Processes via
Regularization [49.05403412954533]
Robust decision processes (MDPs) provide a framework to model decision problems where the system dynamics are changing or only partially known.
Recent work established the equivalence between texttts rectangular $L_p$ robust MDPs and regularized MDPs, and derived a regularized policy iteration scheme that enjoys the same level of efficiency as standard MDPs.
In this work, we focus on the policy improvement step and derive concrete forms for the greedy policy and the optimal robust Bellman operators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-28T04:05:20Z) - Iterative Feature Matching: Toward Provable Domain Generalization with
Logarithmic Environments [55.24895403089543]
Domain generalization aims at performing well on unseen test environments with data from a limited number of training environments.
We present a new algorithm based on performing iterative feature matching that is guaranteed with high probability to yield a predictor that generalizes after seeing only $O(logd_s)$ environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-18T04:39:19Z) - Navigating to the Best Policy in Markov Decision Processes [68.8204255655161]
We investigate the active pure exploration problem in Markov Decision Processes.
Agent sequentially selects actions and, from the resulting system trajectory, aims at the best as fast as possible.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-05T09:16:28Z) - Minimax Optimization with Smooth Algorithmic Adversaries [59.47122537182611]
We propose a new algorithm for the min-player against smooth algorithms deployed by an adversary.
Our algorithm is guaranteed to make monotonic progress having no limit cycles, and to find an appropriate number of gradient ascents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-02T22:03:36Z) - Provably Efficient Model-Free Algorithm for MDPs with Peak Constraints [38.2783003051101]
This paper considers the peak Constrained Markov Decision Process (PCMDP), where the agent chooses the policy to maximize total reward in the finite horizon as well as satisfy constraints at each epoch with probability 1.
We propose a model-free algorithm that converts PCMDP problem to an unconstrained problem and a Q-learning based approach is applied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-11T23:23:29Z) - Upper Confidence Primal-Dual Reinforcement Learning for CMDP with
Adversarial Loss [145.54544979467872]
We consider online learning for episodically constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs)
We propose a new emphupper confidence primal-dual algorithm, which only requires the trajectories sampled from the transition model.
Our analysis incorporates a new high-probability drift analysis of Lagrange multiplier processes into the celebrated regret analysis of upper confidence reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-02T05:02:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.