MathScape: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models in Real-World Mathematical Contexts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07543v5
• Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 23:30:39 GMT
• Title: MathScape: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models in Real-World Mathematical Contexts
• Authors: Hao Liang, Linzhuang Sun, Minxuan Zhou, Zirong Chen, Meiyi Qiang, Mingan Lin, Tianpeng Li, Fan Yang, Zenan Zhou, Wentao Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MathScape, a novel benchmark focused on assessing MLLMs' reasoning ability in realistic mathematical contexts.<n>MathScape comprises 1,369 high-quality math problems paired with human-captured real-world images.<n>We conduct a thorough multi-dimensional evaluation across nine leading closed-source MLLMs, three open-source MLLMs with over 20 billion parameters, and seven smaller-scale MLLMs.
• Score: 18.91777213491096
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the rapid progress of Multimodal LLMs, evaluating their mathematical reasoning capabilities has become an increasingly important research direction. In particular, visual-textual mathematical reasoning serves as a key indicator of an MLLM's ability to comprehend and solve complex, multi-step quantitative problems. While existing benchmarks such as MathVista and MathVerse have advanced the evaluation of multimodal math proficiency, they primarily rely on digitally rendered content and fall short in capturing the complexity of real-world scenarios. To bridge this gap, we introduce MathScape, a novel benchmark focused on assessing MLLMs' reasoning ability in realistic mathematical contexts. MathScape comprises 1,369 high-quality math problems paired with human-captured real-world images, closely reflecting the challenges encountered in practical educational settings. We conduct a thorough multi-dimensional evaluation across nine leading closed-source MLLMs, three open-source MLLMs with over 20 billion parameters, and seven smaller-scale MLLMs. Our results show that even SOTA models struggle with real-world math tasks, lagging behind human performance -- highlighting critical limitations in current model capabilities. Moreover, we find that strong performance on synthetic or digitally rendered images does not guarantee similar effectiveness on real-world tasks. This underscores the necessity of MathScape in the next stage of multimodal mathematical reasoning.

Related papers

• MathReal: We Keep It Real! A Real Scene Benchmark for Evaluating Math Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models [29.7077721906364]
  We introduce MathReal, a dataset comprising 2,000 mathematical questions with images captured by handheld mobile devices in authentic scenarios.<n>MathReal spans five core knowledge and ability categories, which encompass three question types and are divided into three difficulty levels.<n>We evaluate the multimodal mathematical reasoning abilities of state-of-the-art MLLMs in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T04:39:16Z)
• MathOPEval: A Fine-grained Evaluation Benchmark for Visual Operations of MLLMs in Mathematical Reasoning [57.42710816140401]
  A promising approach uses code as an intermediate representation to precisely express and manipulate the images in the reasoning steps.<n>Existing evaluations focus mainly on text-only reasoning outputs, leaving the MLLM's ability to perform accurate visual operations via code largely unexplored.<n>This work takes a first step toward addressing that gap by evaluating MLLM's code-based capabilities in multi-modal mathematical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T07:03:11Z)
• CogMath: Assessing LLMs' Authentic Mathematical Ability from a Human Cognitive Perspective [68.94793547575343]
  CogMath formalizes human reasoning process into 3 stages: emphproblem comprehension, emphproblem solving, and emphsolution summarization.<n>In each dimension, we develop an emphInquiry-emphJudge-emphReference'' multi-agent system to generate inquiries that assess LLMs' mastery from this dimension.<n>An LLM is considered to truly master a problem only when excelling in all inquiries from the 9 dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T22:00:52Z)
• Abstractive Visual Understanding of Multi-modal Structured Knowledge: A New Perspective for MLLM Evaluation [48.462734327375536]
  Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) incorporate heterogeneous modalities into LLMs, enabling a comprehensive understanding of diverse scenarios and objects.<n>Despite the proliferation of evaluation benchmarks and leaderboards for MLLMs, they predominantly overlook the critical capacity of MLLMs to comprehend world knowledge with structured abstractions that appear in visual form.<n>We propose M3STR, an innovative benchmark grounded in the Multi-Modal Map for STRuctured understanding.<n>Our findings reveal persistent deficiencies in processing abstractive visual information with structured knowledge, thereby charting a pivotal trajectory for advancing MLLMs' holistic reasoning capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T04:00:35Z)
• MV-MATH: Evaluating Multimodal Math Reasoning in Multi-Visual Contexts [34.972503583614674]
  We introduce MV-MATH: a meticulously curated dataset of 2,009 high-quality mathematical problems. Each problem integrates multiple images interleaved with text, derived from authentic K-12 scenarios, and enriched with detailed annotations. MV-MATH includes multiple-choice, free-form, and multi-step questions, covering 11 subject areas across 3 difficulty levels. We observe that MLLMs encounter substantial challenges in multi-visual math tasks, with a considerable performance gap relative to human capabilities on MV-MATH.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T07:50:36Z)
• VOILA: Evaluation of MLLMs For Perceptual Understanding and Analogical Reasoning [63.0285363282581]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become a powerful tool for integrating visual and textual information. We introduce VOILA, a benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' perceptual understanding and abstract relational reasoning. We reveal that current MLLMs struggle to comprehend inter-image relationships and exhibit limited capabilities in high-level relational reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T23:36:19Z)
• EmbodiedEval: Evaluate Multimodal LLMs as Embodied Agents [57.4686961979566]
  EmbodiedEval is a comprehensive and interactive evaluation benchmark for MLLMs with embodied tasks. It covers a broad spectrum of existing embodied AI tasks with significantly enhanced diversity. We evaluated the state-of-the-art MLLMs on EmbodiedEval and found that they have a significant shortfall compared to human level on embodied tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T03:22:10Z)
• Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark [73.27104042215207]
  We introduce EMMA, a benchmark targeting organic multimodal reasoning across mathematics, physics, chemistry, and coding. EMMA tasks demand advanced cross-modal reasoning that cannot be addressed by reasoning independently in each modality. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs on EMMA reveals significant limitations in handling complex multimodal and multi-step reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T18:55:52Z)
• Polymath: A Challenging Multi-modal Mathematical Reasoning Benchmark [53.61633384281524]
  PolyMATH is a benchmark aimed at evaluating the general cognitive reasoning abilities of MLLMs. The best scores achieved on PolyMATH are 41%, 36%, and 27%, obtained by Claude-3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o and Gemini-1.5 Pro respectively. A further fine-grained error analysis reveals that these models struggle to understand spatial relations and perform drawn-out, high-level reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T20:35:41Z)
• ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection [60.297079601066784]
  We introduce ErrorRadar, the first benchmark designed to assess MLLMs' capabilities in error detection. ErrorRadar evaluates two sub-tasks: error step identification and error categorization. It consists of 2,500 high-quality multimodal K-12 mathematical problems, collected from real-world student interactions. Results indicate significant challenges still remain, as GPT-4o with best performance is still around 10% behind human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T14:59:09Z)
• MathGLM-Vision: Solving Mathematical Problems with Multi-Modal Large Language Model [37.26146689342965]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities in mathematical reasoning. MLLMs tend to focus predominantly on solving geometric problems but ignore the diversity of visual information available in other areas of mathematics. We aim to construct a fine-tuning dataset named MathVL, and develop a series of specialized mathematical MLLMs termed MathGLM-Vision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T01:20:22Z)
• CMM-Math: A Chinese Multimodal Math Dataset To Evaluate and Enhance the Mathematics Reasoning of Large Multimodal Models [35.9843681685377]
  We release a Chinese multimodal math (CMM-Math) dataset to evaluate and enhance the mathematical reasoning of LMMs. CMM-Math contains over 28,000 high-quality samples with detailed solutions across 12 grade levels from elementary to high school in China. We propose a Multimodal Mathematical LMM (Math-LMM) to handle the problems with mixed input of multiple images and text segments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T16:00:21Z)
• Math-PUMA: Progressive Upward Multimodal Alignment to Enhance Mathematical Reasoning [5.9767694994869425]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in solving text-based mathematical problems. They struggle with mathematical diagrams since they are primarily trained on natural scene images. We propose Math-PUMA, a methodology focused on Progressive Upward Multimodal Alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T10:11:05Z)
• Math-LLaVA: Bootstrapping Mathematical Reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models [62.815222721144636]
  We introduce Math-LLaVA, a LLaVA-1.5-based model fine-tuned with MathV360K. This novel approach significantly improves the multimodal mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLaVA-1.5. Math-LLaVA demonstrates enhanced generalizability, showing substantial improvements on the MMMU benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T05:43:21Z)
• MathChat: Benchmarking Mathematical Reasoning and Instruction Following in Multi-Turn Interactions [58.57255822646756]
  This paper introduces MathChat, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) across a broader spectrum of mathematical tasks. We evaluate the performance of various SOTA LLMs on the MathChat benchmark, and we observe that while these models excel in single turn question answering, they significantly underperform in more complex scenarios. We develop MathChat sync, a synthetic dialogue based math dataset for LLM finetuning, focusing on improving models' interaction and instruction following capabilities in conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T18:45:55Z)
• MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark [82.64129627675123]
  MathBench is a new benchmark that rigorously assesses the mathematical capabilities of large language models. MathBench spans a wide range of mathematical disciplines, offering a detailed evaluation of both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T17:52:29Z)
• MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems? [99.0305256706604]
  We introduce MathVerse, an all-around visual math benchmark designed for an equitable and in-depth evaluation of MLLMs. We meticulously collect 2,612 high-quality, multi-subject math problems with diagrams from publicly available sources. This approach allows MathVerse to comprehensively assess whether and how much MLLMs can truly understand the visual diagrams for mathematical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T17:59:50Z)
• GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solvers [68.77382332826167]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across various mathematical reasoning benchmarks. One essential and frequently occurring evidence is that when the math questions are slightly changed, LLMs can behave incorrectly. This motivates us to evaluate the robustness of LLMs' math reasoning capability by testing a wide range of question variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T15:26:14Z)
• Measuring Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with MATH-Vision Dataset [33.65525875690291]
  We present the MATH-Vision dataset, a collection of 3,040 high-quality mathematical problems with visual contexts sourced from real math competitions. Through extensive experimentation, we unveil a notable performance gap between current LMMs and human performance on MATH-V. Our detailed categorization allows for a thorough error analysis of LMMs, offering valuable insights to guide future research and development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T18:56:38Z)
• Evaluating LLMs' Mathematical Reasoning in Financial Document Question Answering [53.56653281752486]
  This study explores Large Language Models' mathematical reasoning on four financial question-answering datasets. We focus on sensitivity to table complexity and performance variations with an increasing number of arithmetic reasoning steps. We introduce a novel prompting technique tailored to semi-structured documents, matching or outperforming other baselines in performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T05:10:18Z)
• InfiMM-Eval: Complex Open-Ended Reasoning Evaluation For Multi-Modal Large Language Models [50.03163753638256]
  Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly prominent in the field of artificial intelligence. Our benchmark comprises three key reasoning categories: deductive, abductive, and analogical reasoning. We evaluate a selection of representative MLLMs using this rigorously developed open-ended multi-step elaborate reasoning benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T07:06:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.