Estimating Peer Direct and Indirect Effects in Observational Network Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11492v2
• Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:16:48 GMT
• Title: Estimating Peer Direct and Indirect Effects in Observational Network Data
• Authors: Xiaojing Du, Jiuyong Li, Debo Cheng, Lin Liu, Wentao Gao, Xiongren Chen,
• Abstract summary: We propose a general setting which considers both peer direct effects and peer indirect effects, and the effect of an individual's own treatment. We use attention mechanisms to distinguish the influences of different neighbors and explore high-order neighbor effects through graph neural networks. Our theoretical findings have the potential to improve intervention strategies in networked systems, with applications in areas such as social networks and epidemiology.
• Score: 16.006409149421515
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Estimating causal effects is crucial for decision-makers in many applications, but it is particularly challenging with observational network data due to peer interactions. Many algorithms have been proposed to estimate causal effects involving network data, particularly peer effects, but they often overlook the variety of peer effects. To address this issue, we propose a general setting which considers both peer direct effects and peer indirect effects, and the effect of an individual's own treatment, and provide identification conditions of these causal effects and proofs. To estimate these causal effects, we utilize attention mechanisms to distinguish the influences of different neighbors and explore high-order neighbor effects through multi-layer graph neural networks (GNNs). Additionally, to control the dependency between node features and representations, we incorporate the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) into the GNN, fully utilizing the structural information of the graph, to enhance the robustness and accuracy of the model. Extensive experiments on two semi-synthetic datasets confirm the effectiveness of our approach. Our theoretical findings have the potential to improve intervention strategies in networked systems, with applications in areas such as social networks and epidemiology.

Related papers

• Network Causal Effect Estimation In Graphical Models Of Contagion And Latent Confounding [2.654975444537834]
  Key question in many network studies is whether the observed correlations between units are primarily due to contagion or latent confounding. We propose network causal effect estimation strategies that provide unbiased and consistent estimates. We evaluate the effectiveness of our methods with synthetic data and the validity of our assumptions using real-world networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T22:12:44Z)
• Influence Maximization via Graph Neural Bandits [54.45552721334886]
  We set the IM problem in a multi-round diffusion campaign, aiming to maximize the number of distinct users that are influenced. We propose the framework IM-GNB (Influence Maximization with Graph Neural Bandits), where we provide an estimate of the users' probabilities of being influenced.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T17:54:33Z)
• Graph Machine Learning based Doubly Robust Estimator for Network Causal Effects [17.44202934049009]
  We propose a novel methodology that combines graph machine learning approaches with the double machine learning framework. We demonstrate our method is accurate, robust, and scalable via an extensive simulation study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T20:23:42Z)
• Inferring Individual Direct Causal Effects Under Heterogeneous Peer Influence [10.609670658904562]
  Causal inference in networks should account for interference, which occurs when a unit's outcome is influenced by treatments or outcomes of peers. We propose a structural causal model for networks that can capture different possible assumptions about network structure, interference conditions, and causal dependence. We find potential heterogeneous contexts using the causal model and propose a novel graph neural network-based estimator to estimate individual direct causal effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-27T13:57:26Z)
• Towards Learning and Explaining Indirect Causal Effects in Neural Networks [22.658383399117003]
  We view an NN as a structural causal model (SCM) and extend our focus to include indirect causal effects by introducing feedforward connections among input neurons. We propose an ante-hoc method that captures and maintains direct, indirect, and total causal effects during NN model training. We also propose an algorithm for quantifying learned causal effects in an NN model and efficient approximation strategies for quantifying causal effects in high-dimensional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T08:17:31Z)
• Energy-based Out-of-Distribution Detection for Graph Neural Networks [76.0242218180483]
  We propose a simple, powerful and efficient OOD detection model for GNN-based learning on graphs, which we call GNNSafe. GNNSafe achieves up to $17.0%$ AUROC improvement over state-of-the-arts and it could serve as simple yet strong baselines in such an under-developed area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T16:38:43Z)
• CausalDialogue: Modeling Utterance-level Causality in Conversations [83.03604651485327]
  We have compiled and expanded upon a new dataset called CausalDialogue through crowd-sourcing. This dataset includes multiple cause-effect pairs within a directed acyclic graph (DAG) structure. We propose a causality-enhanced method called Exponential Average Treatment Effect (ExMATE) to enhance the impact of causality at the utterance level in training neural conversation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T18:31:50Z)
• Learning Neural Causal Models with Active Interventions [83.44636110899742]
  We introduce an active intervention-targeting mechanism which enables a quick identification of the underlying causal structure of the data-generating process. Our method significantly reduces the required number of interactions compared with random intervention targeting. We demonstrate superior performance on multiple benchmarks from simulated to real-world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T13:10:37Z)
• Towards Unbiased Visual Emotion Recognition via Causal Intervention [63.74095927462]
  We propose a novel Emotion Recognition Network (IERN) to alleviate the negative effects brought by the dataset bias. A series of designed tests validate the effectiveness of IERN, and experiments on three emotion benchmarks demonstrate that IERN outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-26T10:40:59Z)
• Graph Infomax Adversarial Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation with Networked Observational Data [9.08763820415824]
  We propose a Graph Infomax Adrial Learning (GIAL) model for treatment effect estimation, which makes full use of the network structure to capture more information. We evaluate the performance of our GIAL model on two benchmark datasets, and the results demonstrate superiority over the state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T12:30:14Z)
• Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragile [52.31375893260445]
  influence functions approximate the effect of samples in test-time predictions. influence estimates are fairly accurate for shallow networks. Hessian regularization is important to get highquality influence estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T18:25:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.