Advancing Multi-Organ Disease Care: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04224v2
• Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2025 09:45:41 GMT
• Title: Advancing Multi-Organ Disease Care: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework
• Authors: Daniel J. Tan, Qianyi Xu, Kay Choong See, Dilruk Perera, Mengling Feng,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning framework.<n>Our architecture deploys specialized and dedicated agents for each organ system.<n>We introduce a dual-layer state representation technique that contextualizes patient conditions at both global and organ-specific levels.
• Score: 3.577634519691725
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In healthcare, multi-organ system diseases pose unique and significant challenges as they impact multiple physiological systems concurrently, demanding complex and coordinated treatment strategies. Despite recent advancements in the AI based clinical decision support systems, these solutions only focus on individual organ systems, failing to account for complex interdependencies between them. This narrow focus greatly hinders their effectiveness in recommending holistic and clinically actionable treatments in the real world setting. To address this critical gap, we propose a novel Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (HMARL) framework. Our architecture deploys specialized and dedicated agents for each organ system and facilitates inter-agent communication to enable synergistic decision-making across organ systems. Furthermore, we introduce a dual-layer state representation technique that contextualizes patient conditions at both global and organ-specific levels, improving the accuracy and relevance of treatment decisions. We evaluate our HMARL solution on the task of sepsis management, a common and critical multi-organ disease, using both qualitative and quantitative metrics. Our method learns effective, clinically aligned treatment policies that considerably improve patient survival. We believe this framework represents a significant advancement in clinical decision support systems, introducing the first RL solution explicitly designed for multi-organ treatment recommendations. Our solution moves beyond prevailing simplified, single-organ models that fall short in addressing the complexity of multi-organ diseases.

Related papers

• Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z)
• Collaborative Medical Triage under Uncertainty: A Multi-Agent Dynamic Matching Approach [4.474709234869498]
  Post-pandemic surge in healthcare demand, coupled with critical nursing shortages, has placed unprecedented pressure on medical triage systems.<n>We present a multi-agent interactive intelligent system for medical triage that addresses three fundamental challenges in current AI-based triage systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T09:21:59Z)
• Silence is Not Consensus: Disrupting Agreement Bias in Multi-Agent LLMs via Catfish Agent for Clinical Decision Making [80.94208848596215]
  We present a new concept called Catfish Agent, a role-specialized LLM designed to inject structured dissent and counter silent agreement.<n>Inspired by the catfish effect'' in organizational psychology, the Catfish Agent is designed to challenge emerging consensus to stimulate deeper reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T17:59:50Z)
• DoctorAgent-RL: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Reinforcement Learning System for Multi-Turn Clinical Dialogue [14.95390953068765]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated excellent capabilities in the field of biomedical question answering, but their application in real-world clinical consultations still faces core challenges.<n>We propose Ours, a reinforcement learning (RL)-based multi-agent collaborative framework that models medical consultations as a dynamic decision-making process under uncertainty.<n>Our approach shows immense practical value by reducing misdiagnosis risks in time-pressured settings, freeing clinicians for complex cases, and pioneering a strategy to optimize medical resource allocation and alleviate workforce shortages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T07:48:14Z)
• TAMA: A Human-AI Collaborative Thematic Analysis Framework Using Multi-Agent LLMs for Clinical Interviews [54.35097932763878]
  Thematic analysis (TA) is a widely used qualitative approach for uncovering latent meanings in unstructured text data. Here, we propose TAMA: A Human-AI Collaborative Thematic Analysis framework using Multi-Agent LLMs for clinical interviews. We demonstrate that TAMA outperforms existing LLM-assisted TA approaches, achieving higher thematic hit rate, coverage, and distinctiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T15:58:16Z)
• Empowering Medical Multi-Agents with Clinical Consultation Flow for Dynamic Diagnosis [20.59719567178192]
  We propose a multi-agent framework inspired by consultation flow and reinforcement learning (RL) to simulate the entire consultation process. Our approach incorporates a hierarchical action set, structured from clinic consultation flow and medical textbook, to effectively guide the decision-making process. This strategy improves agent interactions, enabling them to adapt and optimize actions based on the dynamic state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T08:47:18Z)
• Expertise Is What We Want [0.0]
  We share an application architecture, the Large Language Expert (LLE), that combines the flexibility and power of Large Language Models (LLMs) with the interpretability, explainability, and reliability of Expert Systems. To highlight the power of the Large Language Expert (LLE) system, we built an LLE to assist with the workup of patients newly diagnosed with cancer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T18:05:15Z)
• Exploring the Requirements of Clinicians for Explainable AI Decision Support Systems in Intensive Care [1.950650243134358]
  Thematic analysis revealed three core themes: (T1) ICU decision-making relies on a wide range of factors, (T2) the complexity of patient state is challenging for shared decision-making, and (T3) requirements and capabilities of AI decision support systems. We include design recommendations from clinical input, providing insights to inform future AI systems for intensive care.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T17:53:07Z)
• Towards Next-Generation Medical Agent: How o1 is Reshaping Decision-Making in Medical Scenarios [46.729092855387165]
  We study the choice of the backbone LLM for medical AI agents, which is the foundation for the agent's overall reasoning and action generation.<n>Our findings demonstrate o1's ability to enhance diagnostic accuracy and consistency, paving the way for smarter, more responsive AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-16T18:19:53Z)
• A Demonstration of Adaptive Collaboration of Large Language Models for Medical Decision-Making [38.2229221645303]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) promise to streamline this process by synthesizing vast medical knowledge and multi-modal health data. Our MDAgents address this need by dynamically assigning collaboration structures to LLMs based on task complexity. This framework improves diagnostic accuracy and supports adaptive responses in complex, real-world medical scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T22:58:08Z)
• Agent-Oriented Planning in Multi-Agent Systems [54.429028104022066]
  We propose a novel framework for agent-oriented planning in multi-agent systems, leveraging a fast task decomposition and allocation process. We integrate a feedback loop into the proposed framework to further enhance the effectiveness and robustness of such a problem-solving process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T04:07:51Z)
• Enhancing Medical Learning and Reasoning Systems: A Boxology-Based Comparative Analysis of Design Patterns [0.0]
  This study analyzes hybrid AI systems' design patterns and their effectiveness in clinical decision-making. Boxology's structured, modular apporach offers significant advantages in developing and analyzing hybrid AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T12:53:04Z)
• A cooperative strategy for diagnosing the root causes of quality requirement violations in multiagent systems [4.710921988115686]
  We propose a cooperative strategy focused on the identification of the root causes of quality requirement violations in multiagent systems. This strategy allows agents to cooperate with each other in order to identify whether these violations come from service providers, associated components, or the communication infrastructure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T14:41:33Z)
• Safe and Interpretable Estimation of Optimal Treatment Regimes [54.257304443780434]
  We operationalize a safe and interpretable framework to identify optimal treatment regimes. Our findings support personalized treatment strategies based on a patient's medical history and pharmacological features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T19:59:10Z)
• Adaptive Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Timely Healthcare Interventions [17.405080523382235]
  We propose a novel AI-driven patient monitoring framework using multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (DRL) Our approach deploys multiple learning agents, each dedicated to monitoring a specific physiological feature, such as heart rate, respiration, and temperature. We evaluate the performance of the proposed multi-agent DRL framework using real-world physiological and motion data from two datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T00:42:08Z)
• Validating polyp and instrument segmentation methods in colonoscopy through Medico 2020 and MedAI 2021 Challenges [58.32937972322058]
  "Medico automatic polyp segmentation (Medico 2020)" and "MedAI: Transparency in Medical Image (MedAI 2021)" competitions. We present a comprehensive summary and analyze each contribution, highlight the strength of the best-performing methods, and discuss the possibility of clinical translations of such methods into the clinic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-30T16:08:45Z)
• The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through Simulation [81.72197368690031]
  We present a new benchmarking suite designed specifically for medical sequential decision making. The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment is a publicly available Python package providing simple and easy access to high-fidelity synthetic medical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T10:38:09Z)
• Inheritance-guided Hierarchical Assignment for Clinical Automatic Diagnosis [50.15205065710629]
  Clinical diagnosis, which aims to assign diagnosis codes for a patient based on the clinical note, plays an essential role in clinical decision-making. We propose a novel framework to combine the inheritance-guided hierarchical assignment and co-occurrence graph propagation for clinical automatic diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T13:16:51Z)
• Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Automatic Disease Diagnosis [52.111516253474285]
  We propose to integrate a hierarchical policy structure of two levels into the dialogue systemfor policy learning. The proposed policy structure is capable to deal with diagnosis problem including large number of diseases and symptoms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T15:02:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.