A RAG Approach for Generating Competency Questions in Ontology Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08820v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:34:32 GMT
• Title: A RAG Approach for Generating Competency Questions in Ontology Engineering
• Authors: Xueli Pan, Jacco van Ossenbruggen, Victor de Boer, Zhisheng Huang,
• Abstract summary: With the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), there arises the possibility to automate and enhance this process. We present a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach that uses LLMs for the automatic generation of CQs. We conduct experiments using GPT-4 on two domain engineering tasks and compare results against ground-truth CQs constructed by domain experts.
• Score: 1.0044270899550196
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Competency question (CQ) formulation is central to several ontology development and evaluation methodologies. Traditionally, the task of crafting these competency questions heavily relies on the effort of domain experts and knowledge engineers which is often time-consuming and labor-intensive. With the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), there arises the possibility to automate and enhance this process. Unlike other similar works which use existing ontologies or knowledge graphs as input to LLMs, we present a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach that uses LLMs for the automatic generation of CQs given a set of scientific papers considered to be a domain knowledge base. We investigate its performance and specifically, we study the impact of different number of papers to the RAG and different temperature setting of the LLM. We conduct experiments using GPT-4 on two domain ontology engineering tasks and compare results against ground-truth CQs constructed by domain experts. Empirical assessments on the results, utilizing evaluation metrics (precision and consistency), reveal that compared to zero-shot prompting, adding relevant domain knowledge to the RAG improves the performance of LLMs on generating CQs for concrete ontology engineering tasks.

Related papers

• AGENT-CQ: Automatic Generation and Evaluation of Clarifying Questions for Conversational Search with LLMs [53.6200736559742]
  AGENT-CQ consists of two stages: a generation stage and an evaluation stage. CrowdLLM simulates human crowdsourcing judgments to assess generated questions and answers. Experiments on the ClariQ dataset demonstrate CrowdLLM's effectiveness in evaluating question and answer quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T17:06:27Z)
• Unveiling and Consulting Core Experts in Retrieval-Augmented MoE-based LLMs [64.9693406713216]
  Internal mechanisms that contribute to the effectiveness of RAG systems remain underexplored. Our experiments reveal that several core groups of experts are primarily responsible for RAG-related behaviors. We propose several strategies to enhance RAG's efficiency and effectiveness through expert activation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T16:08:54Z)
• StructRAG: Boosting Knowledge Intensive Reasoning of LLMs via Inference-time Hybrid Information Structurization [94.31508613367296]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a key means to effectively enhance large language models (LLMs) We propose StructRAG, which can identify the optimal structure type for the task at hand, reconstruct original documents into this structured format, and infer answers based on the resulting structure. Experiments show that StructRAG achieves state-of-the-art performance, particularly excelling in challenging scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T13:52:44Z)
• Knowledge Tagging with Large Language Model based Multi-Agent System [17.53518487546791]
  This paper investigates the use of a multi-agent system to address the limitations of previous algorithms. We highlight the significant potential of an LLM-based multi-agent system in overcoming the challenges that previous methods have encountered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-12T21:39:01Z)
• Evaluating ChatGPT on Nuclear Domain-Specific Data [0.0]
  This paper examines the application of ChatGPT, a large language model (LLM), for question-and-answer (Q&A) tasks in the highly specialized field of nuclear data. The primary focus is on evaluating ChatGPT's performance on a curated test dataset. The findings underscore the improvement in performance when incorporating a RAG pipeline in an LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T08:17:42Z)
• LLMs are not Zero-Shot Reasoners for Biomedical Information Extraction [13.965777046473885]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for applications in healthcare. It is unclear how well LLMs perform on tasks that are traditionally pursued in the biomedical domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T09:37:40Z)
• Knowledge Tagging System on Math Questions via LLMs with Flexible Demonstration Retriever [48.5585921817745]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are used to automate the knowledge tagging task. We show the strong performance of zero- and few-shot results over math questions knowledge tagging tasks. By proposing a reinforcement learning-based demonstration retriever, we successfully exploit the great potential of different-sized LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T23:30:01Z)
• DomainRAG: A Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Domain-specific Retrieval-Augmented Generation [19.907074685082]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation offers a promising solution to address various limitations of Large Language Models. Current studies often rely on general knowledge sources like Wikipedia to assess the models' abilities in solving common-sense problems. We identified six required abilities for RAG models, including the ability in conversational RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T05:33:51Z)
• A Survey on RAG Meeting LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [71.25225058845324]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated revolutionary abilities in language understanding and generation. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can offer reliable and up-to-date external knowledge. RA-LLMs have emerged to harness external and authoritative knowledge bases, rather than relying on the model's internal knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T02:48:45Z)
• REAR: A Relevance-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Open-Domain Question Answering [122.62012375722124]
  In existing methods, large language models (LLMs) cannot precisely assess the relevance of retrieved documents. We propose REAR, a RElevance-Aware Retrieval-augmented approach for open-domain question answering (QA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T13:22:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.