ChainBuddy: An AI Agent System for Generating LLM Pipelines

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13588v2
• Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2025 21:59:10 GMT
• Title: ChainBuddy: An AI Agent System for Generating LLM Pipelines
• Authors: Jingyue Zhang, Ian Arawjo,
• Abstract summary: ChainBuddy is an AI workflow generation assistant built into the ChainForge platform. From a single prompt or chat, ChainBuddy generates a starter evaluative pipeline in ChainForge aligned to the user's requirements. We find that when using AI assistance, participants reported a less demanding workload, felt more confident, and produced higher quality pipelines evaluating LLM behavior.
• Score: 2.7624021966289605
• License:
• Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) advance, their potential applications have grown significantly. However, it remains difficult to evaluate LLM behavior on user-defined tasks and craft effective pipelines to do so. Many users struggle with where to start, often referred to as the "blank page problem." ChainBuddy, an AI workflow generation assistant built into the ChainForge platform, aims to tackle this issue. From a single prompt or chat, ChainBuddy generates a starter evaluative LLM pipeline in ChainForge aligned to the user's requirements. ChainBuddy offers a straightforward and user-friendly way to plan and evaluate LLM behavior and make the process less daunting and more accessible across a wide range of possible tasks and use cases. We report a within-subjects user study comparing ChainBuddy to the baseline interface. We find that when using AI assistance, participants reported a less demanding workload, felt more confident, and produced higher quality pipelines evaluating LLM behavior. However, we also uncover a mismatch between subjective and objective ratings of performance: participants rated their successfulness similarly across conditions, while independent experts rated participant workflows significantly higher with AI assistance. Drawing connections to the Dunning-Kruger effect, we draw design implications for the future of workflow generation assistants to mitigate the risk of over-reliance.

Related papers

• Scaling Autonomous Agents via Automatic Reward Modeling And Planning [52.39395405893965]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of tasks. However, they still struggle with problems requiring multi-step decision-making and environmental feedback. We propose a framework that can automatically learn a reward model from the environment without human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:49:25Z)
• Leveraging Online Olympiad-Level Math Problems for LLMs Training and Contamination-Resistant Evaluation [55.21013307734612]
  AoPS-Instruct is a dataset of more than 600,000 high-quality QA pairs. LiveAoPSBench is an evolving evaluation set with timestamps, derived from the latest forum data. Our work presents a scalable approach to creating and maintaining large-scale, high-quality datasets for advanced math reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T06:39:38Z)
• CoPS: Empowering LLM Agents with Provable Cross-Task Experience Sharing [70.25689961697523]
  We propose a generalizable algorithm that enhances sequential reasoning by cross-task experience sharing and selection. Our work bridges the gap between existing sequential reasoning paradigms and validates the effectiveness of leveraging cross-task experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T03:59:53Z)
• Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation [80.74757493266057]
  We introduce WorFBench, a unified workflow generation benchmark with multi-faceted scenarios and intricate graph workflow structures. We also present WorFEval, a systemic evaluation protocol utilizing subsequence and subgraph matching algorithms. We observe that the generated can enhance downstream tasks, enabling them to achieve superior performance with less time during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T12:41:19Z)
• Automated test generation to evaluate tool-augmented LLMs as conversational AI agents [0.27309692684728615]
  We present a test generation pipeline to evaluate conversational AI agents. Our framework uses LLMs to generate diverse tests grounded on user-defined procedures. Our results show that while tool-augmented LLMs perform well in single interactions, they often struggle to handle complete conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T09:57:43Z)
• Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks. LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning. We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z)
• FlowMind: Automatic Workflow Generation with LLMs [12.848562107014093]
  This paper introduces a novel approach, FlowMind, leveraging the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose a generic prompt recipe for a lecture that helps ground LLM reasoning with reliable Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) We also introduce NCEN-QA, a new dataset in finance for benchmarking question-answering tasks from N-CEN reports on funds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T00:36:37Z)
• AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents [88.45506148281379]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly smart and autonomous, targeting real-world pragmatic missions beyond traditional NLP tasks. We present AgentBench, a benchmark that currently consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T16:08:11Z)
• AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model Prompts [12.73129785710807]
  We introduce the concept of Chaining LLM steps together, where the output of one step becomes the input for the next, thus aggregating the gains per step. In a 20-person user study, we found that Chaining not only improved the quality of task outcomes, but also significantly enhanced system transparency, controllability, and sense of collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T19:59:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.