Beyond Expected Returns: A Policy Gradient Algorithm for Cumulative Prospect Theoretic Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02605v1
• Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 15:45:39 GMT
• Title: Beyond Expected Returns: A Policy Gradient Algorithm for Cumulative Prospect Theoretic Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Olivier Lepel, Anas Barakat,
• Abstract summary: Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) has been developed to provide a better model for human-based decision-making supported by empirical evidence. A few years ago, CPT has been combined with Reinforcement Learning (RL) to formulate a CPT policy optimization problem. We show that our policy gradient algorithm scales better to larger state spaces compared to the existing zeroth order algorithm for solving the same problem.
• Score: 0.46040036610482665
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The widely used expected utility theory has been shown to be empirically inconsistent with human preferences in the psychology and behavioral economy literatures. Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) has been developed to fill in this gap and provide a better model for human-based decision-making supported by empirical evidence. It allows to express a wide range of attitudes and perceptions towards risk, gains and losses. A few years ago, CPT has been combined with Reinforcement Learning (RL) to formulate a CPT policy optimization problem where the goal of the agent is to search for a policy generating long-term returns which are aligned with their preferences. In this work, we revisit this policy optimization problem and provide new insights on optimal policies and their nature depending on the utility function under consideration. We further derive a novel policy gradient theorem for the CPT policy optimization objective generalizing the seminal corresponding result in standard RL. This result enables us to design a model-free policy gradient algorithm to solve the CPT-RL problem. We illustrate the performance of our algorithm in simple examples motivated by traffic control and electricity management applications. We also demonstrate that our policy gradient algorithm scales better to larger state spaces compared to the existing zeroth order algorithm for solving the same problem.

Related papers

• Last-Iterate Global Convergence of Policy Gradients for Constrained Reinforcement Learning [62.81324245896717]
  We introduce an exploration-agnostic algorithm, called C-PG, which exhibits global last-ite convergence guarantees under (weak) gradient domination assumptions. We numerically validate our algorithms on constrained control problems, and compare them with state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T14:54:57Z)
• Acceleration in Policy Optimization [50.323182853069184]
  We work towards a unifying paradigm for accelerating policy optimization methods in reinforcement learning (RL) by integrating foresight in the policy improvement step via optimistic and adaptive updates. We define optimism as predictive modelling of the future behavior of a policy, and adaptivity as taking immediate and anticipatory corrective actions to mitigate errors from overshooting predictions or delayed responses to change. We design an optimistic policy gradient algorithm, adaptive via meta-gradient learning, and empirically highlight several design choices pertaining to acceleration, in an illustrative task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-18T15:50:57Z)
• Optimistic Natural Policy Gradient: a Simple Efficient Policy Optimization Framework for Online RL [23.957148537567146]
  This paper proposes a simple efficient policy optimization framework -- Optimistic NPG for online RL. For $d$-dimensional linear MDPs, Optimistic NPG is computationally efficient, and learns an $varepsilon$-optimal policy within $tildeO(d2/varepsilon3)$ samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T15:19:26Z)
• Policy learning "without" overlap: Pessimism and generalized empirical Bernstein's inequality [94.89246810243053]
  This paper studies offline policy learning, which aims at utilizing observations collected a priori to learn an optimal individualized decision rule. Existing policy learning methods rely on a uniform overlap assumption, i.e., the propensities of exploring all actions for all individual characteristics must be lower bounded. We propose Pessimistic Policy Learning (PPL), a new algorithm that optimize lower confidence bounds (LCBs) instead of point estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T22:43:08Z)
• Offline Reinforcement Learning with Closed-Form Policy Improvement Operators [88.54210578912554]
  Behavior constrained policy optimization has been demonstrated to be a successful paradigm for tackling Offline Reinforcement Learning. In this paper, we propose our closed-form policy improvement operators. We empirically demonstrate their effectiveness over state-of-the-art algorithms on the standard D4RL benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T06:29:26Z)
• Hinge Policy Optimization: Rethinking Policy Improvement and Reinterpreting PPO [6.33198867705718]
  Policy optimization is a fundamental principle for designing reinforcement learning algorithms. Despite its superior empirical performance, PPO-clip has not been justified via theoretical proof up to date. This is the first ever that can prove global convergence to an optimal policy for a variant of PPO-clip.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T15:56:57Z)
• Neural Network Compatible Off-Policy Natural Actor-Critic Algorithm [16.115903198836694]
  Learning optimal behavior from existing data is one of the most important problems in Reinforcement Learning (RL) This is known as "off-policy control" in RL where an agent's objective is to compute an optimal policy based on the data obtained from the given policy (known as the behavior policy) This work proposes an off-policy natural actor-critic algorithm that utilizes state-action distribution correction for handling the off-policy behavior and the natural policy gradient for sample efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T14:36:45Z)
• Variance-Reduced Off-Policy Memory-Efficient Policy Search [61.23789485979057]
  Off-policy policy optimization is a challenging problem in reinforcement learning. Off-policy algorithms are memory-efficient and capable of learning from off-policy samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T16:22:46Z)
• Variational Policy Gradient Method for Reinforcement Learning with General Utilities [38.54243339632217]
  In recent years, reinforcement learning systems with general goals beyond a cumulative sum of rewards have gained traction. In this paper, we consider policy in Decision Problems, where the objective converges a general concave utility function. We derive a new Variational Policy Gradient Theorem for RL with general utilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-04T17:51:53Z)
• Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPO [90.90009491366273]
  We study the roots of algorithmic progress in deep policy gradient algorithms through a case study on two popular algorithms. Specifically, we investigate the consequences of "code-level optimizations:" Our results show that they (a) are responsible for most of PPO's gain in cumulative reward over TRPO, and (b) fundamentally change how RL methods function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-25T16:24:59Z)
• Population-Guided Parallel Policy Search for Reinforcement Learning [17.360163137926]
  A new population-guided parallel learning scheme is proposed to enhance the performance of off-policy reinforcement learning (RL) In the proposed scheme, multiple identical learners with their own value-functions and policies share a common experience replay buffer, and search a good policy in collaboration with the guidance of the best policy information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-09T10:13:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.