EBES: Easy Benchmarking for Event Sequences

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03399v1
• Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 13:03:43 GMT
• Title: EBES: Easy Benchmarking for Event Sequences
• Authors: Dmitry Osin, Igor Udovichenko, Viktor Moskvoretskii, Egor Shvetsov, Evgeny Burnaev,
• Abstract summary: Event sequences are common data structures in various real-world domains such as healthcare, finance, and user interaction logs. Despite advances in temporal data modeling techniques, there is no standardized benchmarks for evaluating their performance on event sequences. We introduce EBES, a comprehensive benchmarking tool with standardized evaluation scenarios and protocols.
• Score: 17.277513178760348
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Event sequences, characterized by irregular sampling intervals and a mix of categorical and numerical features, are common data structures in various real-world domains such as healthcare, finance, and user interaction logs. Despite advances in temporal data modeling techniques, there is no standardized benchmarks for evaluating their performance on event sequences. This complicates result comparison across different papers due to varying evaluation protocols, potentially misleading progress in this field. We introduce EBES, a comprehensive benchmarking tool with standardized evaluation scenarios and protocols, focusing on regression and classification problems with sequence-level targets. Our library simplifies benchmarking, dataset addition, and method integration through a unified interface. It includes a novel synthetic dataset and provides preprocessed real-world datasets, including the largest publicly available banking dataset. Our results provide an in-depth analysis of datasets, identifying some as unsuitable for model comparison. We investigate the importance of modeling temporal and sequential components, as well as the robustness and scaling properties of the models. These findings highlight potential directions for future research. Our benchmark aim is to facilitate reproducible research, expediting progress and increasing real-world impacts.

Related papers

• How Hard is this Test Set? NLI Characterization by Exploiting Training Dynamics [49.9329723199239]
  We propose a method for the automated creation of a challenging test set without relying on the manual construction of artificial and unrealistic examples. We categorize the test set of popular NLI datasets into three difficulty levels by leveraging methods that exploit training dynamics. When our characterization method is applied to the training set, models trained with only a fraction of the data achieve comparable performance to those trained on the full dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T13:39:21Z)
• Capturing Temporal Components for Time Series Classification [5.70772577110828]
  This work introduces a textitcompositional representation learning approach trained on statistically coherent components extracted from sequential data. Based on a multi-scale change space, an unsupervised approach is proposed to segment the sequential data into chunks with similar statistical properties. A sequence-based encoder model is trained in a multi-task setting to learn compositional representations from these temporal components for time series classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T16:15:21Z)
• GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models [56.63218531256961]
  We introduce GenBench, a benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models. GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies. We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T08:01:05Z)
• MADS: Modulated Auto-Decoding SIREN for time series imputation [9.673093148930874]
  We propose MADS, a novel auto-decoding framework for time series imputation, built upon implicit neural representations. We evaluate our model on two real-world datasets, and show that it outperforms state-of-the-art methods for time series imputation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T09:08:47Z)
• Revisiting the Evaluation of Image Synthesis with GANs [55.72247435112475]
  This study presents an empirical investigation into the evaluation of synthesis performance, with generative adversarial networks (GANs) as a representative of generative models. In particular, we make in-depth analyses of various factors, including how to represent a data point in the representation space, how to calculate a fair distance using selected samples, and how many instances to use from each set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T17:54:32Z)
• High-Level Synthetic Data Generation with Data Set Archetypes [4.13592995550836]
  Cluster analysis relies on effective benchmarks for evaluating and comparing different algorithms. We propose synthetic data generation based on data set archetypes. It is possible to set up benchmarks purely from verbal descriptions of the evaluation scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T23:45:27Z)
• Detection and Evaluation of Clusters within Sequential Data [58.720142291102135]
  Clustering algorithms for Block Markov Chains possess theoretical optimality guarantees. In particular, our sequential data is derived from human DNA, written text, animal movement data and financial markets. It is found that the Block Markov Chain model assumption can indeed produce meaningful insights in exploratory data analyses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T15:22:39Z)
• Robust Event Classification Using Imperfect Real-world PMU Data [58.26737360525643]
  We study robust event classification using imperfect real-world phasor measurement unit (PMU) data. We develop a novel machine learning framework for training robust event classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-19T17:41:43Z)
• Synthetic Benchmarks for Scientific Research in Explainable Machine Learning [14.172740234933215]
  We release XAI-Bench: a suite of synthetic datasets and a library for benchmarking feature attribution algorithms. Unlike real-world datasets, synthetic datasets allow the efficient computation of conditional expected values. We demonstrate the power of our library by benchmarking popular explainability techniques across several evaluation metrics and identifying failure modes for popular explainers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-23T17:10:21Z)
• Benchmarking the Benchmark -- Analysis of Synthetic NIDS Datasets [4.125187280299247]
  We analyse the statistical properties of benign traffic in three of the more recent and relevant NIDS datasets. Our results show a distinct difference of most of the considered statistical features between the synthetic datasets and two real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T03:17:37Z)
• BREEDS: Benchmarks for Subpopulation Shift [98.90314444545204]
  We develop a methodology for assessing the robustness of models to subpopulation shift. We leverage the class structure underlying existing datasets to control the data subpopulations that comprise the training and test distributions. Applying this methodology to the ImageNet dataset, we create a suite of subpopulation shift benchmarks of varying granularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-11T17:04:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.