Assessing the Creativity of LLMs in Proposing Novel Solutions to Mathematical Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18336v1
• Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:12:49 GMT
• Title: Assessing the Creativity of LLMs in Proposing Novel Solutions to Mathematical Problems
• Authors: Junyi Ye, Jingyi Gu, Xinyun Zhao, Wenpeng Yin, Guiling Wang,
• Abstract summary: This study explores the creative potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in mathematical reasoning. We introduce a novel framework and benchmark, CreativeMath, which encompasses problems ranging from middle school curricula to Olympic-level competitions. Our experiments demonstrate that, while LLMs perform well on standard mathematical tasks, their capacity for creative problem-solving varies considerably.
• Score: 9.162206328913237
• License:
• Abstract: The mathematical capabilities of AI systems are complex and multifaceted. Most existing research has predominantly focused on the correctness of AI-generated solutions to mathematical problems. In this work, we argue that beyond producing correct answers, AI systems should also be capable of, or assist humans in, developing novel solutions to mathematical challenges. This study explores the creative potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in mathematical reasoning, an aspect that has received limited attention in prior research. We introduce a novel framework and benchmark, CreativeMath, which encompasses problems ranging from middle school curricula to Olympic-level competitions, designed to assess LLMs' ability to propose innovative solutions after some known solutions have been provided. Our experiments demonstrate that, while LLMs perform well on standard mathematical tasks, their capacity for creative problem-solving varies considerably. Notably, the Gemini-1.5-Pro model outperformed other LLMs in generating novel solutions. This research opens a new frontier in evaluating AI creativity, shedding light on both the strengths and limitations of LLMs in fostering mathematical innovation, and setting the stage for future developments in AI-assisted mathematical discovery.

Related papers

• BloomWise: Enhancing Problem-Solving capabilities of Large Language Models using Bloom's-Taxonomy-Inspired Prompts [59.83547898874152]
  We introduce BloomWise, a new prompting technique, inspired by Bloom's taxonomy, to improve the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) The decision regarding the need to employ more sophisticated cognitive skills is based on self-evaluation performed by the LLM. In extensive experiments across 4 popular math reasoning datasets, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T09:27:52Z)
• Benchmarking Language Model Creativity: A Case Study on Code Generation [17.56712029335294]
  creativity consists of at least two key characteristics: emphconvergent thinking (purposefulness to achieve a given goal) and emphdivergent thinking (adaptability to new environments or constraints) citeprunco 2003critical We introduce a framework for quantifying LLM creativity that incorporates the two characteristics. This is achieved by (1) Denial Prompting pushes LLMs to come up with more creative solutions to a given problem by incrementally imposing new constraints on the previous solution, and (2) defining and computing the NeoGauge metric which examines both convergent and divergent thinking in the generated creative
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T05:55:22Z)
• MathOdyssey: Benchmarking Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills in Large Language Models Using Odyssey Math Data [20.31528845718877]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language understanding and demonstrated strong problem-solving abilities. This paper investigates the mathematical problem-solving capabilities of LLMs using the newly developed "MathOdyssey" dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T13:02:35Z)
• Evaluating Large Vision-and-Language Models on Children's Mathematical Olympiads [74.54183505245553]
  A systematic analysis of AI capabilities for joint vision and text reasoning is missing in the current scientific literature. We evaluate state-of-the-art LVLMs on their mathematical and algorithmic reasoning abilities using visuo-linguistic problems from children's Olympiads. Our results show that modern LVLMs do demonstrate increasingly powerful reasoning skills in solving problems for higher grades, but lack the foundations to correctly answer problems designed for younger children.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T05:04:39Z)
• Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challenges [15.925641169201747]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are geared towards the automated resolution of mathematical problems. This survey endeavors to address four pivotal dimensions. It provides a holistic perspective on the current state, accomplishments, and future challenges in this rapidly evolving field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T20:26:32Z)
• MacGyver: Are Large Language Models Creative Problem Solvers? [87.70522322728581]
  We explore the creative problem-solving capabilities of modern LLMs in a novel constrained setting. We create MACGYVER, an automatically generated dataset consisting of over 1,600 real-world problems. We present our collection to both LLMs and humans to compare and contrast their problem-solving abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T08:52:27Z)
• SEGO: Sequential Subgoal Optimization for Mathematical Problem-Solving [64.38649623473626]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have driven substantial progress in artificial intelligence. We propose a novel framework called textbfSEquential subtextbfGoal textbfOptimization (SEGO) to enhance LLMs' ability to solve mathematical problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T17:56:40Z)
• LLMs as Potential Brainstorming Partners for Math and Science Problems [0.0]
  A significant chasm still exists between current human-machine intellectual collaborations and the resolution of complex math and science problems. This is due to the recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) We conduct comprehensive case studies to explore both the capabilities and limitations of the current state-of-the-art LLM, notably GPT-4, in collective brainstorming with humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T21:16:35Z)
• SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Models [70.5763210869525]
  We introduce an expansive benchmark suite SciBench for Large Language Model (LLM) SciBench contains a dataset featuring a range of collegiate-level scientific problems from mathematics, chemistry, and physics domains. The results reveal that the current LLMs fall short of delivering satisfactory performance, with the best overall score of merely 43.22%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T07:01:57Z)
• A Survey of Deep Learning for Mathematical Reasoning [71.88150173381153]
  We review the key tasks, datasets, and methods at the intersection of mathematical reasoning and deep learning over the past decade. Recent advances in large-scale neural language models have opened up new benchmarks and opportunities to use deep learning for mathematical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T18:46:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.