Adaptive Optimization for Enhanced Efficiency in Large-Scale Language Model Training

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04718v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 02:17:30 GMT
• Title: Adaptive Optimization for Enhanced Efficiency in Large-Scale Language Model Training
• Authors: Jiajing Chen, Bingying Liu, Xiaoxuan Liao, Jia Gao, Hongye Zheng, Yue Li,
• Abstract summary: Large-scale language models (LLM) have achieved remarkable results in a variety of tasks. This paper proposes an improved method based on adaptive optimization algorithm.
• Score: 3.668740611399284
• License:
• Abstract: With the rapid development of natural language processing technology, large-scale language models (LLM) have achieved remarkable results in a variety of tasks. However, how to effectively train these huge models and improve their performance and computational efficiency remains an important challenge. This paper proposes an improved method based on adaptive optimization algorithm, aiming to improve the training efficiency and final performance of LLM. Through comparative experiments on the SQuAD and GLUE data sets, the experimental results show that compared with traditional optimization algorithms (such as SGD, Momentum, AdaGrad, RMSProp and Adam), the adaptive optimization algorithm we proposed has better accuracy and F1 score. Both have achieved significant improvements, especially showed stronger training capabilities when processed large-scale texts and complex tasks. The research results verify the advantages of adaptive optimization algorithms in large-scale language model training and provide new ideas and directions for future optimization methods.

Related papers

• Plug-and-Play Training Framework for Preference Optimization [25.53286104242179]
  We propose a novel training framework for large language models (LLMs) This framework employs multiple sampling to analyze output distributions, assign different weights to samples, and incorporate these weights into the preference optimization process. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework integrates seamlessly with various preference optimization methods and achieves consistent improvements in mathematical reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T15:01:48Z)
• Unlearning as multi-task optimization: A normalized gradient difference approach with an adaptive learning rate [105.86576388991713]
  We introduce a normalized gradient difference (NGDiff) algorithm, enabling us to have better control over the trade-off between the objectives. We provide a theoretical analysis and empirically demonstrate the superior performance of NGDiff among state-of-the-art unlearning methods on the TOFU and MUSE datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T14:41:44Z)
• Optima: Optimizing Effectiveness and Efficiency for LLM-Based Multi-Agent System [75.25394449773052]
  Large Language Model (LLM) based multi-agent systems (MAS) show remarkable potential in collaborative problem-solving. Yet they still face critical challenges: low communication efficiency, poor scalability, and a lack of effective parameter-updating optimization methods. We present Optima, a novel framework that addresses these issues by significantly enhancing both communication efficiency and task effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:00:06Z)
• Discovering Preference Optimization Algorithms with and for Large Language Models [50.843710797024805]
  offline preference optimization is a key method for enhancing and controlling the quality of Large Language Model (LLM) outputs. We perform objective discovery to automatically discover new state-of-the-art preference optimization algorithms without (expert) human intervention. Experiments demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of DiscoPOP, a novel algorithm that adaptively blends logistic and exponential losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T16:58:41Z)
• Model Uncertainty in Evolutionary Optimization and Bayesian Optimization: A Comparative Analysis [5.6787965501364335]
  Black-box optimization problems are common in many real-world applications. These problems require optimization through input-output interactions without access to internal workings. Two widely used gradient-free optimization techniques are employed to address such challenges. This paper aims to elucidate the similarities and differences in the utilization of model uncertainty between these two methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T13:59:19Z)
• PhaseEvo: Towards Unified In-Context Prompt Optimization for Large Language Models [9.362082187605356]
  We present PhaseEvo, an efficient automatic prompt optimization framework that combines the generative capability of LLMs with the global search proficiency of evolution algorithms. PhaseEvo significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline methods by a large margin whilst maintaining good efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T17:47:10Z)
• A Data-Driven Evolutionary Transfer Optimization for Expensive Problems in Dynamic Environments [9.098403098464704]
  Data-driven, a.k.a. surrogate-assisted, evolutionary optimization has been recognized as an effective approach for tackling expensive black-box optimization problems. This paper proposes a simple but effective transfer learning framework to empower data-driven evolutionary optimization to solve dynamic optimization problems. Experiments on synthetic benchmark test problems and a real-world case study demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-05T11:19:50Z)
• An Empirical Evaluation of Zeroth-Order Optimization Methods on AI-driven Molecule Optimization [78.36413169647408]
  We study the effectiveness of various ZO optimization methods for optimizing molecular objectives. We show the advantages of ZO sign-based gradient descent (ZO-signGD) We demonstrate the potential effectiveness of ZO optimization methods on widely used benchmark tasks from the Guacamol suite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T01:58:10Z)
• Bayesian Optimization for Selecting Efficient Machine Learning Models [53.202224677485525]
  We present a unified Bayesian Optimization framework for jointly optimizing models for both prediction effectiveness and training efficiency. Experiments on model selection for recommendation tasks indicate models selected this way significantly improves model training efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T02:56:30Z)
• Automatically Learning Compact Quality-aware Surrogates for Optimization Problems [55.94450542785096]
  Solving optimization problems with unknown parameters requires learning a predictive model to predict the values of the unknown parameters and then solving the problem using these values. Recent work has shown that including the optimization problem as a layer in a complex training model pipeline results in predictions of iteration of unobserved decision making. We show that we can improve solution quality by learning a low-dimensional surrogate model of a large optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T19:11:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.