Large Language Models for Mental Health Diagnostic Assessments: Exploring The Potential of Large Language Models for Assisting with Mental Health Diagnostic Assessments -- The Depression and Anxiety Case

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01305v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 15:34:02 GMT
• Title: Large Language Models for Mental Health Diagnostic Assessments: Exploring The Potential of Large Language Models for Assisting with Mental Health Diagnostic Assessments -- The Depression and Anxiety Case
• Authors: Kaushik Roy, Harshul Surana, Darssan Eswaramoorthi, Yuxin Zi, Vedant Palit, Ritvik Garimella, Amit Sheth,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly attracting the attention of healthcare professionals.<n>This paper examines the diagnostic assessment processes described in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for major depressive disorder (MDD) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)<n>For fine-tuning, we utilize the Mentalllama and Llama models, while for prompting, we experiment with proprietary models like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4o, as well as open-source models such as llama-3.1-8b and mixtral-8x7b.
• Score: 5.166889174594258
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly attracting the attention of healthcare professionals for their potential to assist in diagnostic assessments, which could alleviate the strain on the healthcare system caused by a high patient load and a shortage of providers. For LLMs to be effective in supporting diagnostic assessments, it is essential that they closely replicate the standard diagnostic procedures used by clinicians. In this paper, we specifically examine the diagnostic assessment processes described in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for major depressive disorder (MDD) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). We investigate various prompting and fine-tuning techniques to guide both proprietary and open-source LLMs in adhering to these processes, and we evaluate the agreement between LLM-generated diagnostic outcomes and expert-validated ground truth. For fine-tuning, we utilize the Mentalllama and Llama models, while for prompting, we experiment with proprietary models like GPT-3.5 and GPT-4o, as well as open-source models such as llama-3.1-8b and mixtral-8x7b.

Related papers

• Performance of Large Language Models in Supporting Medical Diagnosis and Treatment [0.0]
  AI-driven systems can analyze vast datasets, assisting clinicians in identifying diseases, recommending treatments, and predicting patient outcomes. This study evaluates the performance of a range of contemporary LLMs, including both open-source and closed-source models, on the 2024 Portuguese National Exam for medical specialty access.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T16:53:59Z)
• Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions. We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning. Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z)
• Improving Interactive Diagnostic Ability of a Large Language Model Agent Through Clinical Experience Learning [17.647875658030006]
  This study investigates the underlying mechanisms behind the performance degradation phenomenon. We developed a plug-and-play method enhanced (PPME) LLM agent, leveraging over 3.5 million electronic medical records from Chinese and American healthcare facilities. Our approach integrates specialized models for initial disease diagnosis and inquiry into the history of the present illness, trained through supervised and reinforcement learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T06:24:20Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment. We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews. Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• RuleAlign: Making Large Language Models Better Physicians with Diagnostic Rule Alignment [54.91736546490813]
  We introduce the RuleAlign framework, designed to align Large Language Models with specific diagnostic rules. We develop a medical dialogue dataset comprising rule-based communications between patients and physicians. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T17:44:40Z)
• Automating PTSD Diagnostics in Clinical Interviews: Leveraging Large Language Models for Trauma Assessments [7.219693607724636]
  We aim to tackle this shortage by integrating a customized large language model (LLM) into the workflow. We collect 411 clinician-administered diagnostic interviews and devise a novel approach to obtain high-quality data. We build a comprehensive framework to automate PTSD diagnostic assessments based on interview contents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-18T05:04:18Z)
• Digital Diagnostics: The Potential Of Large Language Models In Recognizing Symptoms Of Common Illnesses [0.2995925627097048]
  This study evaluates each model diagnostic abilities by interpreting a user symptoms and determining diagnoses that fit well with common illnesses. GPT-4 demonstrates higher diagnostic accuracy from its deep and complete history of training on medical data. Gemini performs with high precision as a critical tool in disease triage, demonstrating its potential to be a reliable model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T15:12:24Z)
• A Spectrum Evaluation Benchmark for Medical Multi-Modal Large Language Models [57.88111980149541]
  We introduce Asclepius, a novel Med-MLLM benchmark that assesses Med-MLLMs in terms of distinct medical specialties and different diagnostic capacities.<n>Grounded in 3 proposed core principles, Asclepius ensures a comprehensive evaluation by encompassing 15 medical specialties.<n>We also provide an in-depth analysis of 6 Med-MLLMs and compare them with 3 human specialists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T08:04:23Z)
• Beyond Direct Diagnosis: LLM-based Multi-Specialist Agent Consultation for Automatic Diagnosis [30.943705201552643]
  We propose a framework to model the diagnosis process in the real world by adaptively fusing probability distributions of agents over potential diseases. Our approach requires significantly less parameter updating and training time, enhancing efficiency and practical utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T12:25:30Z)
• Empowering Psychotherapy with Large Language Models: Cognitive Distortion Detection through Diagnosis of Thought Prompting [82.64015366154884]
  We study the task of cognitive distortion detection and propose the Diagnosis of Thought (DoT) prompting. DoT performs diagnosis on the patient's speech via three stages: subjectivity assessment to separate the facts and the thoughts; contrastive reasoning to elicit the reasoning processes supporting and contradicting the thoughts; and schema analysis to summarize the cognition schemas. Experiments demonstrate that DoT obtains significant improvements over ChatGPT for cognitive distortion detection, while generating high-quality rationales approved by human experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T02:47:21Z)
• Deciphering Diagnoses: How Large Language Models Explanations Influence Clinical Decision Making [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are emerging as a promising tool to generate plain-text explanations for medical decisions. This study explores the effectiveness and reliability of LLMs in generating explanations for diagnoses based on patient complaints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T00:08:23Z)
• Towards the Identifiability and Explainability for Personalized Learner Modeling: An Inductive Paradigm [36.60917255464867]
  We propose an identifiable cognitive diagnosis framework (ID-CDF) based on a novel response-proficiency-response paradigm inspired by encoder-decoder models. We show that ID-CDF can effectively address the problems without loss of diagnosis preciseness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T07:18:02Z)
• Leveraging A Medical Knowledge Graph into Large Language Models for Diagnosis Prediction [7.5569033426158585]
  We propose an innovative approach for augmenting the proficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs) in automated diagnosis generation. We derive the KG from the National Library of Medicine's Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), a robust repository of biomedical knowledge. Our approach offers an explainable diagnostic pathway, edging us closer to the realization of AI-augmented diagnostic decision support systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T06:05:18Z)
• Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on Patient-Trial Matching [49.78442796596806]
  We propose an innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for patient-trial matching (LLM-PTM) Our experiments demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T03:14:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.