Linear Feedback Control Systems for Iterative Prompt Optimization in Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11979v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 08:52:47 GMT
- Title: Linear Feedback Control Systems for Iterative Prompt Optimization in Large Language Models
- Authors: Rupesh Raj Karn,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various applications by generating outputs based on given prompts.<n>This paper presents a novel approach that draws parallels between the iterative prompt optimization process in LLMs and feedback control systems.
- Score: 0.9572675949441439
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various applications by generating outputs based on given prompts. However, achieving the desired output requires iterative prompt refinement. This paper presents a novel approach that draws parallels between the iterative prompt optimization process in LLMs and feedback control systems. We iteratively refine the prompt by treating the deviation between the LLM output and the desired result as an error term until the output criteria are met. This process is akin to a feedback control system, where the LLM, despite being non-linear and non-deterministic, is managed using principles from linear feedback control systems. We explore the application of different types of controllers within this framework, providing a mathematical foundation for integrating linear feedback control mechanisms with LLMs.
Related papers
- LLMs-guided adaptive compensator: Bringing Adaptivity to Automatic Control Systems with Large Language Models [22.989496527440636]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in robotics.<n>We propose an LLM-guided adaptive compensator framework that avoids designing controllers from scratch.<n>This study opens a new direction for applying LLMs in the field of automatic control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-28T04:12:43Z) - Discrete Tokenization for Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Survey [69.45421620616486]
This work presents the first structured taxonomy and analysis of discrete tokenization methods designed for large language models (LLMs)<n>We categorize 8 representative VQ variants that span classical and modern paradigms and analyze their algorithmic principles, training dynamics, and integration challenges with LLM pipelines.<n>We identify key challenges including codebook collapse, unstable gradient estimation, and modality-specific encoding constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-21T10:52:14Z) - Can Prompt Difficulty be Online Predicted for Accelerating RL Finetuning of Reasoning Models? [62.579951798437115]
This work investigates iterative approximate evaluation for arbitrary prompts.<n>It introduces Model Predictive Prompt Selection (MoPPS), a Bayesian risk-predictive framework.<n>MoPPS reliably predicts prompt difficulty and accelerates training with significantly reduced rollouts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T03:20:52Z) - Leveraging Importance Sampling to Detach Alignment Modules from Large Language Models [50.19188692497892]
Traditional alignment methods often require retraining large pretrained models.<n>We propose a novel textitResidual Alignment Model (textitRAM) that formalizes the alignment process as a type of importance sampling.<n>We develop a resampling algorithm with iterative token-level decoding to address the common first-token latency issue in comparable methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T08:53:02Z) - IMPROVE: Iterative Model Pipeline Refinement and Optimization Leveraging LLM Agents [17.301758094000125]
Large language model (LLM) agents have emerged as a promising solution to automate the development of computer vision models.
We introduce Iterative Refinement, a novel strategy for LLM-driven ML pipeline design.
Iterative Refinement improves stability, interpretability, and overall model performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T01:52:37Z) - Multi-Bin Batching for Increasing LLM Inference Throughput [19.652542432683234]
Large language models (LL) grow in popularity improving the efficiency of their systems.<n> requests is a critical step in scheduling jobs on servers.<n> requests often have varying generation lengths, causing resource underutilization.<n>We formalize this problem from a queueing-theoretic perspective, and aim to design a throughput control policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-03T03:16:12Z) - An Evaluation-Driven Approach to Designing LLM Agents: Process and Architecture [25.752294816136807]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled the development of LLM agents capable of autonomously achieving under-specified goals.
Conventional approaches, such as pre-defined test cases and code/model redevelopment pipelines, are inadequate for addressing the unique challenges of LLM agent development.
This paper introduces an evaluation-driven design approach, inspired by test-driven development, to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T00:34:30Z) - Provenance: A Light-weight Fact-checker for Retrieval Augmented LLM Generation Output [49.893971654861424]
We present a light-weight approach for detecting nonfactual outputs from retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
We compute a factuality score that can be thresholded to yield a binary decision.
Our experiments show high area under the ROC curve (AUC) across a wide range of relevant open source datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-01T20:44:59Z) - LLM-based Optimization of Compound AI Systems: A Survey [64.39860384538338]
In a compound AI system, components such as an LLM call, a retriever, a code interpreter, or tools are interconnected.
Recent advancements enable end-to-end optimization of these parameters using an LLM.
This paper presents a survey of the principles and emerging trends in LLM-based optimization of compound AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T18:06:25Z) - Attribute Controlled Fine-tuning for Large Language Models: A Case Study on Detoxification [76.14641982122696]
We propose a constraint learning schema for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with attribute control.
We show that our approach leads to an LLM that produces fewer inappropriate responses while achieving competitive performance on benchmarks and a toxicity detection task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T23:38:58Z) - RLEF: Grounding Code LLMs in Execution Feedback with Reinforcement Learning [33.754240030720425]
Large language models (LLMs) deployed as agents solve user-specified tasks over multiple steps while keeping the required manual engagement to a minimum.
We propose an end-to-end reinforcement learning method for teaching models to leverage execution feedback in the realm of code synthesis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T23:25:17Z) - Aligning Large Language Models with Representation Editing: A Control Perspective [38.71496554018039]
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) to align with human objectives is crucial for real-world applications.
Test-time alignment techniques, such as prompting and guided decoding, do not modify the underlying model.
We propose aligning LLMs through representation editing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-10T01:21:31Z) - How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback.
Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities.
We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z) - LLMRefine: Pinpointing and Refining Large Language Models via Fine-Grained Actionable Feedback [65.84061725174269]
Recent large language models (LLM) are leveraging human feedback to improve their generation quality.
We propose LLMRefine, an inference time optimization method to refine LLM's output.
We conduct experiments on three text generation tasks, including machine translation, long-form question answering (QA), and topical summarization.
LLMRefine consistently outperforms all baseline approaches, achieving improvements up to 1.7 MetricX points on translation tasks, 8.1 ROUGE-L on ASQA, 2.2 ROUGE-L on topical summarization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T19:52:11Z) - Self Optimisation and Automatic Code Generation by Evolutionary
Algorithms in PLC based Controlling Processes [0.0]
A novel approach based on evolutionary algorithms is proposed to self optimise the system logic of complex processes.
The presented approach is evaluated on an industrial liquid station process subject to a multi-objective problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-12T06:36:54Z) - Guiding Large Language Models via Directional Stimulus Prompting [114.84930073977672]
We introduce Directional Stimulus Prompting, a novel framework for guiding black-box large language models (LLMs) toward specific desired outputs.
Instead of directly adjusting LLMs, our method employs a small tunable policy model to generate an auxiliary directional stimulus prompt for each input instance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-22T17:44:15Z) - Certified Reinforcement Learning with Logic Guidance [78.2286146954051]
We propose a model-free RL algorithm that enables the use of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) to formulate a goal for unknown continuous-state/action Markov Decision Processes (MDPs)
The algorithm is guaranteed to synthesise a control policy whose traces satisfy the specification with maximal probability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-02-02T20:09:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.