Scale-Insensitive Neural Network Significance Tests

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15753v3
• Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 05:53:46 GMT
• Title: Scale-Insensitive Neural Network Significance Tests
• Authors: Hasan Fallahgoul,
• Abstract summary: This paper develops a scale-insensitive framework for neural network significance testing. We replace metric entropy calculations with Rademacher complexity bounds. We weaken the regularity conditions on the target function to require only Sobolev space membership.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: This paper develops a scale-insensitive framework for neural network significance testing, substantially generalizing existing approaches through three key innovations. First, we replace metric entropy calculations with Rademacher complexity bounds, enabling the analysis of neural networks without requiring bounded weights or specific architectural constraints. Second, we weaken the regularity conditions on the target function to require only Sobolev space membership $H^s([-1,1]^d)$ with $s > d/2$, significantly relaxing previous smoothness assumptions while maintaining optimal approximation rates. Third, we introduce a modified sieve space construction based on moment bounds rather than weight constraints, providing a more natural theoretical framework for modern deep learning practices. Our approach achieves these generalizations while preserving optimal convergence rates and establishing valid asymptotic distributions for test statistics. The technical foundation combines localization theory, sharp concentration inequalities, and scale-insensitive complexity measures to handle unbounded weights and general Lipschitz activation functions. This framework better aligns theoretical guarantees with contemporary deep learning practice while maintaining mathematical rigor.

Related papers

• Generalization and Risk Bounds for Recurrent Neural Networks [3.0638061480679912]
  We establish a new generalization error bound for vanilla RNNs. We provide a unified framework to calculate the Rademacher complexity that can be applied to a variety of loss functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T03:49:06Z)
• The Boundaries of Verifiable Accuracy, Robustness, and Generalisation in Deep Learning [71.14237199051276]
  We consider classical distribution-agnostic framework and algorithms minimising empirical risks. We show that there is a large family of tasks for which computing and verifying ideal stable and accurate neural networks is extremely challenging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T16:33:27Z)
• No Wrong Turns: The Simple Geometry Of Neural Networks Optimization Paths [12.068608358926317]
  First-order optimization algorithms are known to efficiently locate favorable minima in deep neural networks. We focus on the fundamental geometric properties of sampled quantities of optimization on two key paths. Our findings suggest that not only do optimization trajectories never encounter significant obstacles, but they also maintain stable dynamics during the majority of training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T22:10:40Z)
• Structured Optimal Variational Inference for Dynamic Latent Space Models [16.531262817315696]
  We consider a latent space model for dynamic networks, where our objective is to estimate the pairwise inner products plus the intercept of the latent positions. To balance posterior inference and computational scalability, we consider a structured mean-field variational inference framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-29T22:10:42Z)
• Robust Learning of Parsimonious Deep Neural Networks [0.0]
  We propose a simultaneous learning and pruning algorithm capable of identifying and eliminating irrelevant structures in a neural network. We derive a novel hyper-prior distribution over the prior parameters that is crucial for their optimal selection. We evaluate the proposed algorithm on the MNIST data set and commonly used fully connected and convolutional LeNet architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-10T03:38:55Z)
• Robust Implicit Networks via Non-Euclidean Contractions [63.91638306025768]
  Implicit neural networks show improved accuracy and significant reduction in memory consumption. They can suffer from ill-posedness and convergence instability. This paper provides a new framework to design well-posed and robust implicit neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T18:05:02Z)
• A Convergence Theory Towards Practical Over-parameterized Deep Neural Networks [56.084798078072396]
  We take a step towards closing the gap between theory and practice by significantly improving the known theoretical bounds on both the network width and the convergence time. We show that convergence to a global minimum is guaranteed for networks with quadratic widths in the sample size and linear in their depth at a time logarithmic in both. Our analysis and convergence bounds are derived via the construction of a surrogate network with fixed activation patterns that can be transformed at any time to an equivalent ReLU network of a reasonable size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-12T00:40:45Z)
• Efficient Methods for Structured Nonconvex-Nonconcave Min-Max Optimization [98.0595480384208]
  We propose a generalization extraient spaces which converges to a stationary point. The algorithm applies not only to general $p$-normed spaces, but also to general $p$-dimensional vector spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-31T21:35:42Z)
• Distance-Based Regularisation of Deep Networks for Fine-Tuning [116.71288796019809]
  We develop an algorithm that constrains a hypothesis class to a small sphere centred on the initial pre-trained weights. Empirical evaluation shows that our algorithm works well, corroborating our theoretical results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-19T16:00:47Z)
• Understanding Generalization in Deep Learning via Tensor Methods [53.808840694241]
  We advance the understanding of the relations between the network's architecture and its generalizability from the compression perspective. We propose a series of intuitive, data-dependent and easily-measurable properties that tightly characterize the compressibility and generalizability of neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-14T22:26:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.